ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mangoseed · 27 January 2019, 06:00 AM

When was it last updated? 2001?

I would like to see a thinner bezel, no more screw-down pushers and much more legible chronograph sub-dials.

DoctorA · 27 January 2019, 06:04 AM

I’d like to see it available !!

660ft · 27 January 2019, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoctorA

I’d like to see it available !!

037 · 27 January 2019, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoctorA

I’d like to see it available !!

What? You own both black and white and have sold at least two black here on TRF. How many more do you need?

DoctorA · 27 January 2019, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 037

What? You own both black and white and have sold at least two black here on TRF. How many more do you need?

At least 2?? I think your facts are way off!

037 · 27 January 2019, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoctorA

At least 2?? I think your facts are way off!

So you've sold more than two?

March 2018: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=594239
May 2018: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=606485

Chadridv · 27 January 2019, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mangoseed

When was it last updated? 2001?

I would like to see a thinner bezel, no more screw-down pushers and much more legible chronograph sub-dials.

it was last updated in 2016 with the 116500 and IMO they nailed it.

It's not the perfect watch by any means, but it's true to it's heritage and IMO shouldn't stray too far.

That said, my ideal watch is 40-41mm and has a date function, but again, those are changes i personally don't want to see in the daytona as it would lose it's historic charm.

Harry-57 · 27 January 2019, 06:05 AM

A date function.

psv · 27 January 2019, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harry-57

a date function.

never. Ever.

emersm · 27 January 2019, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry-57

A date function.

X2^

Kamen · 27 January 2019, 06:10 AM

Having picked up my first Daytona this year I find it really is almost perfect. I got the YG Oysterflex model with the black subdials (golden panda) and I really wouldn't change a thing. Honeymoon period full on haha

jms135 · 27 January 2019, 06:10 AM

For me, maybe slightly wider lugs on the ss models similar to the pm ones. It will retain its size but visually wear a fraction bigger without going wacky :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Goin2drt · 27 January 2019, 06:12 AM

Mass production so all the gray BS stops and everyone that wants one can buy one.

beshannon · 27 January 2019, 06:13 AM

Perfect as is

psv · 27 January 2019, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mangoseed

When was it last updated? 2001?

I would like to see a thinner bezel, no more screw-down pushers and much more legible chronograph sub-dials.

Those would be my wishes as well. Perhaps a version without polished case and center links as well.

blankapdx · 27 January 2019, 06:48 AM

42mm would be perfect

avidflyer · 27 January 2019, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blankapdx

42mm would be perfect

41 or 42 seems to wear small

Fleegle · 27 January 2019, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blankapdx

42mm would be perfect

+ 1.

DLRIDES · 27 January 2019, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blankapdx

42mm would be perfect

This

Too small, dial excessively busy, disturbingly trendy ...............

RolexinPA · 27 January 2019, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blankapdx

42mm would be perfect

i agree

joshua.pearl3 · 27 January 2019, 07:59 AM

I'd like to see the stainless steel on my wrist.

Starhutch · 27 January 2019, 08:06 AM

No changes

HogwldFLTR · 27 January 2019, 08:08 AM

I'm happy the way it is!!!!

WatchAlert · 27 January 2019, 08:15 AM

Make it a 41mm!

Roger Lococco · 27 January 2019, 08:22 AM

I think part of the draw is the ability to fit such a great movement in a small footprint. So while a larger case would be nicer in some ways, I’d probably keep it the same.

A blue dial stainless steel version would be awesome :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

watchwatcher · 27 January 2019, 09:08 AM

I love it the way it is.

However, as long as we're talking, if we could lose the screw down chrono pushers, and maybe add a flyback complication to the chronograph function, that would be gravy.

pickettt · 27 January 2019, 09:09 AM

Availability

KeithP · 27 January 2019, 09:11 AM

Legibility.

KWT · 27 January 2019, 09:15 AM

I think the current Daytona looks perfect. I only wish they change the screw-down pushers just like AP did on their Royal Oak Chronographs.

hbryant130 · 27 January 2019, 10:41 AM

Perfect as is. Own the steel 500 with white dial. I love both the white and black dial of the new SS versions. A grail would be to own the 50th anniversary Platona! Absolutely love the ice blue dial.

27 January 2019, 06:00 AM	#1
mangoseed Banned Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Everywhere Posts: 420	What would you like to see on the next generation Daytona? When was it last updated? 2001? I would like to see a thinner bezel, no more screw-down pushers and much more legible chronograph sub-dials.

27 January 2019, 06:04 AM	#2
DoctorA "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: USA Posts: 6,545	I’d like to see it available !! __________________ Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!

27 January 2019, 06:10 AM	#12
jms135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: los angeles Posts: 67	What would you like to see on the next generation Daytona? For me, maybe slightly wider lugs on the ss models similar to the pm ones. It will retain its size but visually wear a fraction bigger without going wacky :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ SkyD Rhodium, yg DD40, 116505, 116655 pave dial, D500 white, Lvc, Subc, dj II rhodium, bbb, sd43, blnr, dj41.

27 January 2019, 06:13 AM	#14
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	Perfect as is __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

27 January 2019, 08:08 AM	#23
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,671	I'm happy the way it is!!!! __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

27 January 2019, 06:05 AM	#8
Harry-57 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: Harry Location: England Posts: 10,639	A date function.

27 January 2019, 06:10 AM	#11
Kamen "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Vancouver Posts: 265	Having picked up my first Daytona this year I find it really is almost perfect. I got the YG Oysterflex model with the black subdials (golden panda) and I really wouldn't change a thing. Honeymoon period full on haha

27 January 2019, 06:12 AM	#13
Goin2drt Banned Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Kentucky Posts: 2,307	Mass production so all the gray BS stops and everyone that wants one can buy one.

27 January 2019, 06:48 AM	#16
blankapdx "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: USA Watch: 116500 black Posts: 312	42mm would be perfect

27 January 2019, 07:59 AM	#21
joshua.pearl3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: London Posts: 61	I'd like to see the stainless steel on my wrist.

27 January 2019, 08:06 AM	#22
Starhutch 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: HUTCH Location: USA Watch: PROBLEM Posts: 1,364	No changes

27 January 2019, 08:15 AM	#24
WatchAlert "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Atlanta, GA USA Watch: Rolex Datejust II Posts: 13	Make it a 41mm!

27 January 2019, 08:22 AM	#25
Roger Lococco "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Real Name: Roger Lococco Location: Asia Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi Posts: 2,980	I think part of the draw is the ability to fit such a great movement in a small footprint. So while a larger case would be nicer in some ways, I’d probably keep it the same. A blue dial stainless steel version would be awesome :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 116500 Daytona White Dial 126710BLNR GMT II 126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II

27 January 2019, 09:08 AM	#26
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,011	I love it the way it is. However, as long as we're talking, if we could lose the screw down chrono pushers, and maybe add a flyback complication to the chronograph function, that would be gravy.

27 January 2019, 09:09 AM	#27
pickettt "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: California Watch: Shiny One Posts: 5,443	Availability

27 January 2019, 09:11 AM	#28
KeithP "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: Keith Location: NYC Watch: AK 126900/SM 300M Posts: 1,664	Legibility.

27 January 2019, 09:15 AM	#29
KWT "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Mansour Location: KWT Posts: 169	I think the current Daytona looks perfect. I only wish they change the screw-down pushers just like AP did on their Royal Oak Chronographs.

27 January 2019, 10:41 AM	#30
hbryant130 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: down by the river Posts: 53	Perfect as is. Own the steel 500 with white dial. I love both the white and black dial of the new SS versions. A grail would be to own the 50th anniversary Platona! Absolutely love the ice blue dial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)