ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 February 2019, 04:39 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
I had a BLNR - And today I don’t. (14060)
It was by my own choice too.
I love the BLNR ... In photos online, on Instagram, in forum photos, etc. When I saw it I knew I wanted to have it. Until I didn’t. It happened quickly. Maybe even a few minutes into owning it. I loved the BLNR but I hated it on me. I should love it though. Everyone else does. ADs can’t keep them in stock. It’s going to be discontinued (maybe?)? I have to like it. It’s gone up almost 30% in value since I got it. Nope. Still don’t like it. It’s chunky, bulky, not proportioned well - beautiful yes - but on my 6.75 inch wrist? No. You can’t fool yourself no matter how hard you try. Took a year to figure out, but finally, I knew what I wanted. I wanted a 5 digit sports model with the newest movement I could get. I found it. A late 2011 - 14060m. B&P with sharp lines and in excellent condition. No solid end links, no maxi case, no bulky clasp. Perfect. Some advice to those just starting in watches, don’t make the same mistakes I did. Just because everyone else loves something doesn’t mean you also have to. It’s not about the investment or the money. Just be true to yourself and your own taste and style. It’s the best advice I can give. I will sleep well tonight. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 February 2019, 04:43 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: NH
Watch: 116400GV 124060
Posts: 1,192
|
I think many of us have bought a watch because we thought we should have it. I did it with a Speedmaster. I was supposed to like it, but I just didn't.
Love that Sub...great watch! |
17 February 2019, 09:50 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
Same here with the Speedmaster. Tried so hard to like it, but I finally gave up after a few months and sold it.
|
16 February 2019, 04:45 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,447
|
Great choice! Great advice!
|
16 February 2019, 04:48 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
A true classic!
__________________
|
16 February 2019, 04:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: me set the time
Posts: 2,520
|
You have to be true to yourself at the end of day. Buy what you like and not the hype.
Luckily for the BLNR you can almost breakeven or make a little profit when you part ways. |
16 February 2019, 04:50 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,623
|
Well done my friend, I've been there more than once!
|
16 February 2019, 04:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, PP, Lange
Posts: 1,024
|
Congrats on the sub no date. I share exact same feeling as yours about the BLNR. Although I still have it, I much prefer to wear my 16710 Pepsi due to better proportioned case design
|
16 February 2019, 04:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Carl
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Rolex Explorer 1
Posts: 1,780
|
Excellent choice! You went with your heart, now you are a happy guy!
I won't go into details, but the same thing has happened to me. Sort of thought that I "should" love a watch because everyone else does (at least everyone on the forums), but it just didn't work for me. On another occasion, I sold three watches to get one, and owned it for about two weeks! And kind of the same thing: A couple months ago, I ordered a Sea-Dweller SD43 from my AD. And I was terribly excited, even though I knew it would be a long wait. Then, just to fill in the time, I started researching other Rolex watches I was interested in. As it happens, I have been loving the 114060 ever since Rolex changed it to the bulkier case. There is so much hype about the SD43, and justifiably so, that I thought I should get the very best. In the end, I realized the 114060 is really the best for me. I suppose I am fortunate to have realized that before I got the watch. So, I changed my order at the AD, and hopefully my 114060 will be here fairly soon! Enjoy your 14060! Cheers, Carl
__________________
Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied. |
16 February 2019, 04:52 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,470
|
I’ve been in your situation. You did great. That 14060 looks fantastic. Congrats and enjoy!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 February 2019, 04:54 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Posts: 132
|
It's BLNR fool you, it doesn't want be on your wrist
|
16 February 2019, 04:54 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Greg
Location: SO CA
Watch: Subs
Posts: 312
|
Wise words worth adhering to (wished I would have gone by that model in the past). Thanks for reaffirming this and by the way-terrific watch choice!
|
16 February 2019, 04:55 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,280
|
Great move finding what works for you! Gotta ask, no SEL’s on a 2011?
|
16 February 2019, 05:07 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
Yep. According to forum research here - on the no date, Rolex left the lug holes and non-SEL bracelet on it until they stopped producing in 2012 to move to the 6 digit references. I too thought the same thing as you, and others asked the same question here. But it’s a 2011 with engraved rehaut and etched crystal and COSC text. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 February 2019, 04:58 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Joe
Location: NYC
Watch: Rolex - Omega
Posts: 441
|
So funny, I actually owned the BLNR twice. So correct, its a great watch, but is gone now and my 14060M took its place. I have a hard time now with the Maxicase in general.
__________________
16710BLRO - 14060M - Omega 321 - 126710BLRO - Omega 3861 |
16 February 2019, 05:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
|
Sometimes you don't realize it's not right for you until you've had the chance to spend some time with it. Very honest perspective and definitely good advice for people to help avoid getting caught up with what they think they should have. That sub is a classic and looks great, congrats!
|
16 February 2019, 05:01 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,423
|
Went through something similar and ended up with practically the same watch (4 line 14060m, barely worn, B&P). I really like it too.
|
16 February 2019, 07:42 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
|
Great watch--Congrats!
Same feelings here--the 6 digits are - technically speaking - perfect watches, but they don't sing to me...Don't know why. I am happy with my 16710. Pepsi and Coke. Tom |
16 February 2019, 07:48 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
|
Lug Holes are the best.
I actually hate changing bracelets to straps without them. 14060 is Awesome. I believe the 14060 or 114060 will be my next Rolex purchase in the near future.
__________________
IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO |
16 February 2019, 07:50 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
Great choice. Got a small wrist also like you and I think that size is about my limit as well (BLNR). I still really love that color scheme though and adore mine. The 5 digit Rolex sports wear much slimmer and effortless for sure, enjoy in good health.
|
16 February 2019, 07:54 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
Yeah my wrist is 6 and 3/4. The BLNR definitely fit. And by fit I mean the lugs didn’t extend past my wrists which is definitely a sign of something being too big. I think for me it was just the proportions. What really sold me was when I got the BB58. I couldn’t take it off the wrist and I instantly knew why. It was the proportions and size. It all kinda clicked. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 February 2019, 08:09 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
Jmbarrack, thanks for sharing what you learned. Your post may well advise someone else into not "following emotional trends" and making the same mistake.
I was not impressed with the 6 digit Subs, and as a result of "doing my homework", I ended up with a 5 digit sub and could not be happier. The 6 digit, tried on at my AD (and no purchase, thank goodness), was just not for me. I almost could not believe how much the different the 5 digit was as far as fitment and how it wore for me. (It was purchased after trying on a 5 digit Sub of a friend, and seeing how it wore). I hope at least one person benefits from your post.
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
16 February 2019, 09:45 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
Thanks. I agree with your note on homework. I think once you do your homework and study things like the original references and how they’ve changed through the years and what their original case proportions and design were, you appreciate the 5 digits much more. More true to the design history of the pieces. And as much as I am skeptical about some of the people making Basel world predictions. The one I hope is true is that we see a return to form of the older case proportions. The best way I could describe it is they lost their elegance. I’d like to see that come back. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 February 2019, 08:11 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: SD43,YMRG,DYTNA500
Posts: 300
|
I like the 5 digit and 6 digit subs. Each piece has a special place in Rolex history. But you did well! Maybe the next purchase will be a 214270 MK2 Explorer :-) perfect proportions!
|
16 February 2019, 08:18 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
Actually that was going to be my second choice if I didn’t find a later model 14060. From what I’ve seen in photos, that also looks like it has a good wrist fit. The other problem today is you can’t try half these models on because they’re not in the store. It makes it very difficult to gage sizing looking at others wrists. At this point, your best bet is knowing your wrist in relationship to Tim Mosso of WatchBox. Because that’s about as good as you can do ... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 February 2019, 08:16 AM | #26 |
-
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 1,001
|
so a different coloured bezel and a no date meant that much to you, because thats really all it is.
|
16 February 2019, 08:20 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
|
16 February 2019, 09:12 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,246
|
|
16 February 2019, 06:41 PM | #29 |
-
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 1,001
|
|
16 February 2019, 09:58 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 1,071
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.