ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
2 October 2020, 10:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
New Sub 124060 Next To The Fat Boy 114060
I know there have been quite a few comparison photos already between the old and new Subs, but I recently picked up a new 124060 at the boutique and thought I’d take a few shots of it next to its older brother.
For my personal taste, this new iteration is everything I’ve always wanted in a Sub. I’ve had every version going back to the 5513, so I’ve sampled them all. For me, this one does it all perfectly. It combines the case shape of the 14060, the maxi dial of the 5513, and adds the modern niceties like the solid bracelet, glidelock clasp, and ceramic bezel. I’ll also be keeping the 114060 anyway, because why not? My wife will probably start wearing it. And my always awesome AD threw in a little steel Rolex branded Swiss Army knife. Very nice! |
2 October 2020, 10:55 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Tulsa, OK
Watch: 126710 BLNR
Posts: 621
|
Congratulations! They both look great!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2020, 11:12 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: LA
Watch: Submariner/DJ 41
Posts: 506
|
wow, side by side you can really see the size differences
|
2 October 2020, 11:15 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 401
|
Does the new sub wear smaller, bigger or same?
|
2 October 2020, 11:28 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
It doesn't wear larger or smaller, but it does wear different. Somehow it feels better on the wrist, for me anyway. I know it's not thinner than the 114060, but somehow it feels like it is. Maybe because of its marginally larger size and wider bracelet the size is spread across the wrist better.
|
2 October 2020, 12:12 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 401
|
Quote:
|
|
2 October 2020, 01:03 PM | #7 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,244
|
Quote:
I think that's it. The wide bracelet of the 42 mm Explorer II almost made it feel sleek to me. Great watches! What a treat to have both
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
|
2 October 2020, 02:32 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
|
|
2 October 2020, 11:15 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Chamblee GA
Posts: 234
|
Great pics
|
2 October 2020, 11:34 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: OC/Ca
Posts: 321
|
it's a beauty
|
2 October 2020, 11:36 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
|
Great side by side pics
|
2 October 2020, 11:38 AM | #12 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,673
|
Could be my old eyes, but I struggle to see a meaningful difference.
|
3 October 2020, 02:02 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,600
|
No doubt. The difference is so minute, it is hard to tell. Likely even harder when seen on the wrist from a distance. Personally, it was a lazy move by Rolex to redesign a case just by increasing the width of the bracelet and end links and milling down the crownguards a bit. I would never flip my 116618 just to get the 126618. That would be nonsensical.
|
3 October 2020, 05:13 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
Quote:
|
|
2 October 2020, 11:40 AM | #15 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Boris
Location: CT
Posts: 896
|
Congratulations!
|
2 October 2020, 12:16 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,690
|
Maybe it's a mental block, but I prefer the maxi case. I feel the case of the new model is bloated. Again, my mind may be playing tricks because of the numbers.
|
2 October 2020, 12:18 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,251
|
Congratulations, wear it in good health! Glad to hear about the fit! If I can get one I’ll get it then retire from watch buying!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
2 October 2020, 04:28 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
Quote:
When this pandemic thing is over I’ll meet you at Trader Vics for a drink and you can try mine on. |
|
2 October 2020, 12:31 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,451
|
The differences are pretty subtle. More subtle in these photos than any of the others I have seen. But I do like the case shape better on the new one. I'd like to try one on someday but that seems like a slim possibility considering in the 2 years since I got my 5 digit I have never seen a sub in an AD.
|
2 October 2020, 12:33 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 124
|
Beautiful watch!
|
2 October 2020, 01:00 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Both very nice, although I prefer the slightly more 'muscular' shape of the 11'
__________________
|
2 October 2020, 01:05 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: C Vo
Location: Georgia
Watch: 117610LN 116610LN
Posts: 1,020
|
Both are excellent watches and both will continue to be the standard for diver watches.
Congrats! |
2 October 2020, 02:17 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 242
|
|
2 October 2020, 04:24 PM | #24 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cheers guys! |
|||
2 October 2020, 01:12 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: UTC/GMT -7 hours
Posts: 1,673
|
Great pictures! How do you feel about the wider bracelet on the new one?
__________________
instagram: santiagowatchcollector |
2 October 2020, 04:25 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
|
2 October 2020, 08:35 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 133
|
|
2 October 2020, 01:42 PM | #28 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,325
|
Congrats
|
2 October 2020, 01:45 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
|
The new 124060 does appear to be something close to perfection.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235 |
2 October 2020, 02:26 PM | #30 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,573
|
New Sub 124060 Next To The Fat Boy 114060
Nobody except watch enthusiasts on these forums will ever notice the difference.
Congratulations by the way. Either way, this is still my favorite watch you can get that has an MSRP under $10k. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.