The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 October 2020, 11:52 AM   #1
hellofromthebay
"TRF" Member
 
hellofromthebay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 630
What’s better? Titanium vs Oystersteel

I see brands like Zenith advertise titanium bands. Meanwhile I’ve never seen Rolex mention titanium. Why is that? Is one better?
hellofromthebay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 11:52 AM   #2
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Ti is harder. Not sure which is better. People here yap that ti shows more scratches but i disagree as an owner of the pelagos and a subc in 904l.

If you want a badass Ti watch go pelagos.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:16 PM   #3
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 415
Ti or 904L

Both are very corrosion resistant and other than weight I don't feel like there are any great advantages to either. I like both.



HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:23 PM   #4
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,162
What’s better? Titanium vs Oystersteel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
If you want a badass Ti watch go pelagos.


Did someone said Pelagos?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:01 PM   #5
JWD531
"TRF" Member
 
JWD531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Tulsa, OK
Watch: 126710 BLNR
Posts: 621
I also think the Pelagos is great. I considered getting the blue dial last year but passed it up as I felt it was just a replacement for what I truly wanted. Very nice watch though. And I thought the titanium was great.

Titanium’s main advantage is because it’s lightweight I think. I have no clue why Rolex does or doesn’t consider it, but it’s definitely not as blingy as 904L, so that could possibly be a reason why. I bet if Rolex ever had a titanium watch, it would be rolanium and be a shiny titanium mix that had platinum and other metals mixed in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JWD531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:20 PM   #6
Jster
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
I don’t care for titanium. The light weight is incongruent to how a watch should feel.
Jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:27 PM   #7
Largoshark
"TRF" Member
 
Largoshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Mike
Location: New England
Posts: 1,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jster View Post
I don’t care for titanium. The light weight is incongruent to how a watch should feel.
This makes no sense to me. Why shouldn't a watch feel light and comfortable on the wrist? I don't own any Ti watches, so this isn't coming from a place of bias. Just don't understand the logic.
Largoshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 05:13 PM   #8
Tanuki
"TRF" Member
 
Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jster View Post
I don’t care for titanium. The light weight is incongruent to how a watch should feel.
Titanium has a different feel than steel and actually feels like something special on the wrist. It’s warm and feels softer, if that’s possible. Try it on before you knock it. It does make steel feel cheap.
Tanuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 12:22 PM   #9
thenewrick
2024 Pledge Member
 
thenewrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: FL
Watch: OP41 Silver
Posts: 1,812
I’ve seen some deep discussions on titanium in grand Seiko forums.

Titanium is just a base metal and the alloys are what’s important. Other watchmakers use oystersteel also it’s just a marketing term. Seiko uses multiple titanium alloys based on price point. Highest end titanium is more scratch resistant than steel. It’s lighter and people say it feels cheap because of the weight.

Titanium alloys can also attract fingerprints and scratches might not as easy to ignore and polish out.

It all depends in the end. I’d like to try titanium as I think I’d prefer a lighter watch.
thenewrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 07:44 PM   #10
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewrick View Post
I’ve seen some deep discussions on titanium in grand Seiko forums.

Titanium is just a base metal and the alloys are what’s important. Other watchmakers use oystersteel also it’s just a marketing term. Seiko uses multiple titanium alloys based on price point. Highest end titanium is more scratch resistant than steel. It’s lighter and people say it feels cheap because of the weight.

Titanium alloys can also attract fingerprints and scratches might not as easy to ignore and polish out.

It all depends in the end. I’d like to try titanium as I think I’d prefer a lighter watch.
Oystersteel may not be a marketing term.
And it may very well be a proprietry name for a material that's defined by a particularly stringent acceptance criterior that upon casual observation appears to be something similar.
At this juncture, only Rolex knows.
Dirt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:02 PM   #11
Where
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Waitlist
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Oystersteel may not be a marketing term.
And it may very well be a proprietry name for a material that's defined by a particularly stringent acceptance criterior that upon casual observation appears to be something similar.
At this juncture, only Rolex knows.
It's 904L steel. We're not getting anything more than that, it's just marketing by Rolex. Steel is a nice entry-level material, but well-finished Titanium is premium. It's stronger, lighter, and more scratch resistant than steel. It would be great if Rolex made a titanium watch, but unfortunately it doesn't align with their design philosophy.
Where is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 01:34 PM   #12
Smobews
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
I wore a titanium Omega PO every day for seven years. It was incredibly comfortable to wear; about 2/3 the weight of steel. It is a grade 5 titanium, so it polishes and finishes nicely. My watch never got any deep scratches or nicks. There is an oxidation layer that develops on the surface. That layer gets superficial scuffs and scratches that eventually get reoxidized and disappear.

I have other titanium watches that are not grade 5, and there is a noticeable difference in performance.

I would be a big fan of a titanium Rolex professional watch.
Smobews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 01:37 PM   #13
Bladeshot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Bladeshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,850
SS and Ti are apples and oranges, but both are nice. Who would not like a lighter watch! I’ve had both. Settled on SS and PM for now. But the Pelagos (for example) is a wonderful piece. Lots to enjoy about it. To each their own.
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade...
Bladeshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 02:19 PM   #14
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
I am not a titanium fan ,dont like the colour and light weight .
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 03:37 PM   #15
RyanJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,448
I prefer grade 5 Ti. Love the weightless feel.
RyanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 04:22 PM   #16
pdnb
"TRF" Member
 
pdnb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The best coast
Watch: 5726, 5212
Posts: 701
Love titanium... but I like brushed cases... alas no Rolex titanium though





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pdnb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 04:53 PM   #17
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 415
Titanium

These Citizen and some Seiko watches have a coating on them that makes them almost impervious to scratches. This first watch is at least 12 years old and does not have a mark on it. The second watch is 52 mm diameter and 13 mm thick, and it is comfortable for me to wear, although I have an 8.25 inch wrist. But I can not imagine wearing it if it was made of steel.



HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 07:49 AM   #18
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdnb View Post
Love titanium... but I like brushed cases... alas no Rolex titanium though



I love that Aquatimer. I knew I should have bought one way back when they made them. I did not always like them but the design has grown on me. Is the model number something like 3536?
HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:10 AM   #19
pdnb
"TRF" Member
 
pdnb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The best coast
Watch: 5726, 5212
Posts: 701
What’s better? Titanium vs Oystersteel

Quote:
Originally Posted by HiDive View Post
I love that Aquatimer. I knew I should have bought one way back when they made them. I did not always like them but the design has grown on me. Is the model number something like 3536?

Yes thanks! This is the 3536-01 (black dial titanium case), other versions are the 3536-02 (black dial SS case), and 3536-03 (white dial SS case)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pdnb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 05:01 PM   #20
Where
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Waitlist
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 44
The titanium on my MR-G is a step above anything I've seen made in steel. Honestly makes steel feel cheap
Where is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 05:34 PM   #21
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
The Pelagos for daily use is an ideal watch. Titanium does not scratch much more than 904L steel and is lighter.
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2020, 05:58 PM   #22
kans86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,340
I prefer the luxurious look and feel of oyster steel. I don't care much about the weight of titanium. Steel is heavier and I prefer the heft of it on my wrist. In the same manner, I prefer the heaver heft of gold and platinum than that of steel. Just my personal preference.
kans86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:23 AM   #23
SPMN
"TRF" Member
 
SPMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: St Paul, MN
Watch: Tudor, Omega
Posts: 1,218
Rolex uses titanium casebacks for the Deep Sea. Personally, I think a big watch like that belongs on titanium. Doubt Rolex will ever do it though.
SPMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:57 AM   #24
GB-GMT
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 17
Not all Ti watches are light. Just got the Tudor Pelagos a few weeks back. I love it.

It weighs 157 grams compared to a Sub which is 155 grams. The watch feels great.
GB-GMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:07 AM   #25
Stan Cooper
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,878
My best friend has a Porsche Design Ref. 3742. It's an interesting piece made by IWC using a JLC Mecaquartz (mechanical movement with a dual quartz crystal timebase using 1 kHz and 4 kHz quartz crystals) moonphase chronograph movement. The quartz timebase combined with the mechanical movement without a bulky balance wheel results in a very slim case. The case and bracelet are titanium, and the advertised accuracy is 48 seconds per year. He's had it for twenty years and loves the look, weight, accuracy, and reliability of the watch, and the feel of it on his wrist.

Sadly, it's been out of production for several years.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IWC Porsche Design Ref 3742 Titanium Moonphase.jpg (177.6 KB, 384 views)
File Type: jpg JLC Caliber 630 Mecaquartz Movement.jpg (81.6 KB, 383 views)
File Type: jpg IWC Porsche Design Ref 3742 Specs.jpg (158.1 KB, 384 views)
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M Traveler GMT Meteorite, Seiko SSC813 quartz solar powered chronograph
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:21 AM   #26
Model12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Real Name: Dave
Location: Knoxville, TN
Watch: Air King 5500
Posts: 57
I wore Seiko titanium SKH202s for 20 years before I bought my 5500. I love the look and feel of the Ti. Probably 20% lighter.
Model12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:22 AM   #27
Spoonage
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,132
I have 2 titanium watches of which 1 is grade 5 polished and the other is not. I like them, it's just another metal to make the case out of. I don't have a preference either way of titanium vs. Stainless. I don't buy the argument of lightweight means cheap. If that's the case 5 digit Rolex with the lighter weight bracelet and clasp would be perceived as cheap. In the automotive world lightweight is king and you find yourself paying more for CF or titanium.
Spoonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:02 AM   #28
Rolex.c6
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex.c6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
I had a Titanium Citizem many years ago. Don't like the weight, I prefer the havier weight of (Oyster)steel. Can't remember if it scratcher more or less then steel.
__________________
Rolex.c6
Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K
Ref. 116600
Rolex.c6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:37 AM   #29
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
It's a b£%&@ to polish. And looks dirty when it gets banged up. And feels like plastic. It all probably depends on the alloy though. Grand Seiko does a great job finishing the stuff. It looks like steel when they do it. ..Whatever it is they do.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:39 AM   #30
cvo
"TRF" Member
 
cvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: C Vo
Location: Georgia
Watch: 117610LN 116610LN
Posts: 1,014
100% Steel.
cvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.