The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 March 2021, 11:25 PM   #1
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,428
Vintage?

Given that an 'Antique' is generally accepted to be at least 100 years old.

What is the current date for a watch to qualify as being 'Vintage'?
Speedbird-1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2021, 11:42 PM   #2
upsidedownbelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 573
25 years.
upsidedownbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 12:15 AM   #3
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,980
Well, if you go over to the vintage section of the forum, you'll see this topic discussed often. I mean a lot, with dozens of threads about it.

Bottom line: There is no definitive definition in the watch world. You can't boil it down to just a number of years. For example, 25 years ago, Rolexes all came with sapphire crystals and were close to switching over to luminova from tritium. Those are not vintage, IMHO. (Those models are often called "neo-vintage."

For me, a vintage Rolex needs, at a minimum, an acrylic crystal and tritium (or radium). Some guys don't consider any five-digit models as vintage, so it all depends on perspective.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 12:19 AM   #4
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Well, if you go over to the vintage section of the forum, you'll see this topic discussed often. I mean a lot, with dozens of threads about it.

Bottom line: There is no definitive definition in the watch world. You can't boil it down to just a number of years. For example, 25 years ago, Rolexes all came with sapphire crystals and were close to switching over to luminova from tritium. Those are not vintage, IMHO.

For me, a vintage Rolex needs, at a minimum, an acrylic crystal and tritium (or radium). Some guys don't consider any five-digit models as vintage, so it all depends on perspective.
Have to agree I would most certainly not call any Rolex vintage if just 25 years old in general like you state acrylic crystals.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 01:29 AM   #5
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Well, if you go over to the vintage section of the forum, you'll see this topic discussed often. I mean a lot, with dozens of threads about it.

Bottom line: There is no definitive definition in the watch world. You can't boil it down to just a number of years. For example, 25 years ago, Rolexes all came with sapphire crystals and were close to switching over to luminova from tritium. Those are not vintage, IMHO. (Those models are often called "neo-vintage."

For me, a vintage Rolex needs, at a minimum, an acrylic crystal and tritium (or radium). Some guys don't consider any five-digit models as vintage, so it all depends on perspective.
Agree! Acrylic crystal and tritium is a must
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 01:35 AM   #6
johnliley
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
johnliley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SLC, Utah USA
Posts: 875
what about the 1630 and the 1530 nearly 50 years old and first Rolex Date and Datejusts with sapphire crystals? ah ha.. ;)
__________________
"What you do or do not do in life will determine what you do or not do in life..." me.
johnliley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 06:42 AM   #7
MoosicPa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Don
Location: Moosic PA
Watch: King Midas & Subma
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justinmg View Post
Agree! Acrylic crystal and tritium is a must
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnliley View Post
what about the 1630 and the 1530 nearly 50 years old and first Rolex Date and Datejusts with sapphire crystals? ah ha.. ;)
Or my King Midas 9630 from the 1960's, the first Rolex to have a synthetic crystal?

https://www.watchbrotherslondon.com/...nly-references

Because there is no standard definition for "vintage", I define it as any Rolex model not currently in production.
__________________
NAWCC Member

"Nothing is to too beautiful, nothing is too expensive" Ettore Bugatti.
MoosicPa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 07:27 AM   #8
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Well, if you go over to the vintage section of the forum, you'll see this topic discussed often. I mean a lot, with dozens of threads about it.

Bottom line: There is no definitive definition in the watch world. You can't boil it down to just a number of years. For example, 25 years ago, Rolexes all came with sapphire crystals and were close to switching over to luminova from tritium. Those are not vintage, IMHO. (Those models are often called "neo-vintage."

For me, a vintage Rolex needs, at a minimum, an acrylic crystal and tritium (or radium). Some guys don't consider any five-digit models as vintage, so it all depends on perspective.
^This. The answer is simple to me. Acrylic = vintage. Sapphire = classic.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:02 AM   #9
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by upsidedownbelt View Post
25 years.
OOF.

In this thread I learned that my 30 year old 16628 and 35 year old 18038 are both Vintage.

I've gotta move my posts to the vintage forums!

Check out my Vintage watch w/ Tritium!

__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:09 AM   #10
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
And so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:17 AM   #11
afmars
"TRF" Member
 
afmars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Andrew
Location: USA
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
And so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".
Ding ding ding!
afmars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:26 AM   #12
johnliley
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
johnliley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SLC, Utah USA
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
And so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".
Boom
__________________
"What you do or do not do in life will determine what you do or not do in life..." me.
johnliley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 04:27 AM   #13
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
And so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".
Submariner Models and years:

6200 1955
6204 1953
6205 1953–1957
6536 1954–1958
6536/1 1955–1961
A/6538 1957
6538 1958-1961
5508 1958–1965
5510 1959
5512 1959–1978
5513 1962–1990
5513/17 1972–1978
5514 1972–1978
5517 1972–1978
1680 1966–1981
16800 1977–1987
168000 1987
16610 1988–2010
14060/M 1990–2012
114060 2012–2020
116610 2010–2020

How about any model that's been OUT OF PRODUCTION for more than 25 years?

a 16610 from 2010 is not vintage, and since it's the same model as from 1988 I don't think I consider either "vintage". But since the 1680XX series have been out of production for more than 25 years I can get down with that as Vintage.
__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 07:47 AM   #14
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
Submariner Models and years:

6200 1955
6204 1953
6205 1953–1957
6536 1954–1958
6536/1 1955–1961
A/6538 1957
6538 1958-1961
5508 1958–1965
5510 1959
5512 1959–1978
5513 1962–1990
5513/17 1972–1978
5514 1972–1978
5517 1972–1978
1680 1966–1981
16800 1977–1987
168000 1987
16610 1988–2010
14060/M 1990–2012
114060 2012–2020
116610 2010–2020

How about any model that's been OUT OF PRODUCTION for more than 25 years?

a 16610 from 2010 is not vintage, and since it's the same model as from 1988 I don't think I consider either "vintage". But since the 1680XX series have been out of production for more than 25 years I can get down with that as Vintage.
I will agree with this. I wouldn't call 16610 of any year vintage. Yet 168000 is. Same as I would not call a 1990 LR Defender vintage. Cause you could get a same one brand new in 2016.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2021, 06:32 AM   #15
Tom1675
"TRF" Member
 
Tom1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
Submariner Models and years:



How about any model that's been OUT OF PRODUCTION for more than 25 years?

a 16610 from 2010 is not vintage, and since it's the same model as from 1988 I don't think I consider either "vintage". But since the 1680XX series have been out of production for more than 25 years I can get down with that as Vintage.
The 1988 version of the 16610 is different from the 2010 in it's lume. Tritium has a lot to do with what I consider vintage. Luminova and Superluminova haven't patinaed... yet...
Tom1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 04:34 AM   #16
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
And so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".

Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post

How about any model that's been OUT OF PRODUCTION for more than 25 years?

a 16610 from 2010 is not vintage, and since it's the same model as from 1988 I don't think I consider either "vintage". But since the 1680XX series have been out of production for more than 25 years I can get down with that as Vintage.
Agree with both
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 06:31 AM   #17
Guinness58
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Idaho
Watch: Sub 5 Digit
Posts: 205
I agree that vintage means different things to different people. I do not consider my 1997 16610 to be vintage (I bought it new, it is still new in my eyes). Although when I was looking up information on the bracelet (93150) and end links (501B) I found the best posts in the vintage forum. Feel my watch and I are dancing on the edge of modern despite it having sapphire crystal and Luminova hands and indices.

No plans to ever sell the watch, it may well be considered vintage at some point while I am wearing it.
Guinness58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2021, 12:49 AM   #18
Tavli3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by tools View Post
and so what was "vintage" in the 80's when everything was "acrylic and tritium"; are some of you saying that vintage didn't exist then?

Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand and proclaim that it starts and stops at a certain date (which the above nonsense implies), then you are saying that dozens of models that have been discontinued for decades are "modern".
+1
Tavli3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2021, 02:10 AM   #19
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Vintage is a moving target. If you stick your head in the sand....
Like that one ....
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 06:37 AM   #20
Case61
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Case61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
OOF.

In this thread I learned that my 30 year old 16628 and 35 year old 18038 are both Vintage.

I've gotta move my posts to the vintage forums!

Check out my Vintage watch w/ Tritium!

I have nothing to contribute to the "vintage" discussion, but WOW is that gorgeous.
Case61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2021, 11:49 PM   #21
Ksporty
"TRF" Member
 
Ksporty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SC
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case61 View Post
I have nothing to contribute to the "vintage" discussion, but WOW is that gorgeous.
Oh man, not a gold or PM guy, but that's a beaut!
Ksporty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2021, 01:54 AM   #22
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
OOF.

In this thread I learned that my 30 year old 16628 and 35 year old 18038 are both Vintage.

I've gotta move my posts to the vintage forums!

Check out my Vintage watch w/ Tritium!
Don't worry - not Vintage ; )

Nice piece though.

Acrylic / Tritium (or older) / Matte dial. Some exceptions made for Matte and Tritium
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 07:53 AM   #23
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
OOF.



In this thread I learned that my 30 year old 16628 and 35 year old 18038 are both Vintage.



I've gotta move my posts to the vintage forums!



Check out my Vintage watch w/ Tritium!





Beautiful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 10:58 AM   #24
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,366
We do need to discuss this extensively every couple of weeks.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2021, 09:55 PM   #25
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
We do need to discuss this extensively every couple of weeks.
Yeah.....
Are you saying this is a vintage topic?
When, exactly does a thread become, vintage?
Speedbird-1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:24 AM   #26
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,971
Anything that is older than when I was born

Got to be pre 1980's
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 06:48 AM   #27
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Vintage watches are like hard-core porn... as the Supreme Court once said, “I don’t know how to describe it, but I know it when I see it.” (1964, Justice Potter Stewart, paraphrased)
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 07:38 AM   #28
skyblue12
"TRF" Member
 
skyblue12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Uk
Posts: 207
This is vintage?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
skyblue12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2021, 02:59 PM   #29
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedbird-1 View Post
Given that an 'Antique' is generally accepted to be at least 100 years old.

What is the current date for a watch to qualify as being 'Vintage'?
Probably 100 years if that is the definition that works for you.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2021, 06:03 AM   #30
Nick9
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ontario
Posts: 378
What’s “vintage”? Easy, just ask Google:

“the year or place in which wine, especially wine of high quality, was produced.”

Hope that settles it.
Nick9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.