How do you, rolexowner think about this omega?

[crazymcmichael]

How do you feel about this model: 210.30.42.20.01.001, omega seamaster
In my opinion it is quite a cool watch.. I always saw it a bit as a no go but i must confess that i like it more and more.. What about you guys?

[BumbleB]

Originally Posted by crazymcmichael

How do you feel about this model: 210.30.42.20.01.001, omega seamaster
In my opinion it is quite a cool watch.. I always saw it a bit as a no go but i must confess that i like it more and more.. What about you guys?

You’re expecting people on a Rolex forum to copy above code and perform a Google search to identify which Omega model you’re referring to...

You expect too much.

I propose you add a picture of the watch you want us to comment on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[crazymcmichael]

Originally Posted by BumbleB

You’re expecting people on a Rolex forum to copy above code and perform a Google search to identify which Omega model you’re referring to...

You expect too much.

I propose you add a picture of the watch you want us to comment on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha, i mean the standard model of the omega sm diver 42mm

[AJMarcus]

Originally Posted by BumbleB

You’re expecting people on a Rolex forum to copy above code and perform a Google search to identify which Omega model you’re referring to...

You expect too much.

I propose you add a picture of the watch you want us to comment on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What he said

[motiontimers]

Originally Posted by BumbleB

You’re expecting people on a Rolex forum to copy above code and perform a Google search to identify which Omega model you’re referring to...

You expect too much.

I propose you add a picture of the watch you want us to comment on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[doramas]

A fantastic Diver that is on a par with a Submariner in both movement and quality of finish but at a more affordable price.

[crazymcmichael]

Originally Posted by doramas

A fantastic Diver that is on a par with a Submariner in both movement and quality of finish but at a more affordable price.

i must say that the bracelet attracts me when i see it on people n real life

[doramas]

Aesthetically I like the watch as a whole, but these are subjective opinions. The quality of the watch is an objective opinion, and I would even go so far as to say that I would choose the Omega Calibre 8800 over the Rolex 32XX, especially in terms of reliability.

[RW16610]

I did a quick Google search, it's nice piece. I was able to see one of these at the AD when I picked one of my watches up from service.

Glad to see the waves back in some form. For me I prefer the Chronograph versions these days but you can't go wrong with this piece, at all.


Image from the Omega website


Image from Reddit

[crazymcmichael]

Originally Posted by RW16610

I did a quick Google search, it's nice piece. I was able to see one of these at the AD when I picked one of my watches up from service.

Glad to see the waves back in some form. For me I prefer the Chronograph versions these days but you can't go wrong with this piece, at all.


Image from the Omega website


Image from Reddit

the black variant is superB

[uniqueMR]

Its nice to have. I have one in rubber strap !!

[crazymcmichael]

Yes a nice realisticly priced watch in comparison with ss rolexes nowadays on GM

[FTX I]

I try to like it but I still prefer the original 2531.80 from the early nineties. I think the new one is overdecorated but that's just me.

[Blackdog]

Originally Posted by FTX I

I try to like it but I still prefer the original 2531.80 from the early nineties. I think the new one is overdecorated but that's just me.

No, it's not just you...

[DCheeta]

Originally Posted by FTX I

I try to like it but I still prefer the original 2531.80 from the early nineties. I think the new one is overdecorated but that's just me.

Originally Posted by Blackdog

No, it's not just you...

You’re definitely not alone. I almost love it, but there’s just a little too much going on for me.

[Greg.A]

It’s a modern interpretation of the old model and i love it!

[rootbeer7]

For me it’s too busy and chintzy! I chose the Seamaster 300 instead as my first venture away from Rolex.

[Stevec14]

Spec wise, it holds its own very well. The bezel action is no where near the sub, but that aside it’s a great watch. Whether it appeals to you visually is up to you however. It’s very versatile in terms of straps however where I’ve never thought the Rolex was.

At around or less than that price, I’d go BB58 but that’s just my own thoughts and preferences

[stevedssd]

I have the white on bracelet and absolutely love it. This is all about personal choice and the recently announced 300's, just make the personal decision even harder!

[gnuyork]

Originally Posted by Stevec14

Spec wise, it holds its own very well. The bezel action is no where near the sub, but that aside it’s a great watch. Whether it appeals to you visually is up to you however. It’s very versatile in terms of straps however where I’ve never thought the Rolex was.

At around or less than that price, I’d go BB58 but that’s just my own thoughts and preferences

I agree with you. I tried on the Seamster 300M the other day and it's a big watch. Lug to lug it can work on my wrist, but it's thick and wears chunky. I was kind of surprised. Not trying to take away from Omega (it looks great), if they made it smaller/thinner I'd love it.

I've tried on the BB58 in the past too, and it felt nearly perfect. Another good alternative is the Oris divers 65 (the one with the bronze outer bezel)...that felt perfect to me.

[myporsche]

It is the sweet spot for Seamasters and loaded with features. It wears comfortable on the wrist especially on rubber which I prefer. The nicest color in my opinion and most overlooked is the grey dial.

[1William]

Great watch and in a lot of ways I prefer it to my two Submariners. Fit and finish are excellent and the rubber strap changes up the wear and look of the watch significantly. The price difference is a big deal and taking that into account the discussion can be had that if you do not want the crown on a watch this could be the one. I wear mine a lot and enjoy them.

[Krash]

There is room for both. I have a Submariner 114060. I want a Blue dial Seamaster too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TimeAZ]

The omega diver is a nice watch but is held back by its vastly inferior bracelet and super bulky clasp, two of the biggest negatives in my book. It's also a touch too thick and the general styling is not nearly as classic when compared to the famous crown's submariner. Other than that, I personally like the date implementation far better on the Omega and I think the Omega movement is technically superior, plus I enjoy the display case-back.

I think from a price/availability perspective, it's a great option.

[ddaly12]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[colpol]

Great looking watch but wish they’d put the date at the 3 instead of the 6

[mailman]

I like it and would buy one over a Submariner for a few reasons. The only reason I wouldn’t buy one is because I’m not a fan of the crown for a helium valve.

[MTdweller]

I love this watch! I own it with the rubber strap and it’s the most comfortable watch I’ve ever owned. Highly recommend.

[Tools]

I haven't bought a Seamaster since they went to those god-awful skeleton hands.

[Brny11]

Bracket yuck. Hands yuck. Crowns yuck. Nice movement and might appeal to others. Just not for me.