The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 August 2022, 08:00 AM   #1
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
32xx Issue Curtailing Your Purchases?

Much has been made of this 32xx issue recently. To be honest, I didn’t even know what the issue was, although I’ve bought several 32xx watches in the last few years. Did not really even think about it (or fully understand it) until this weekend when opportunity arose to add a new 2022 Sub Date. Cannot easily locate NIB prior gen Sub Date and not sure I really want to, since I will wear this on Rubber B and thinner lugs look better IMO. I’m also looking at my other recent purchases with a bit of a disappointed eye, since according to other threads I might have numerous RSC interactions in my future.

Question: is this 32xx issue preventing or causing anyone to hold off from buying new watches right now? If so, how do we know when problem has been resolved and it’s safe to buy again?

Thanks all
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 08:10 AM   #2
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
To be honest no for me, I simply move the watch on if I detect the issue and get another in the hopes of getting a good 32xx. It's allowed me to spend time with a tonne of different types of watches to learn what I actually like.

The issue is two of my watches are quite sentimental ones so for those two I'll persist with RSC for warranty. Not sure what I'll do should warranty runs out but for most I have no issues parting with if the issue surfaces.

Got offered a Blue YM40 a couple of months ago, I said yes, it's gorgeous.
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 08:25 AM   #3
Bengal fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 67
Nope, I do realize some have had issues, but it’s apparently not every watch because the forum would be blowing up with complaints. I’ll let my warranty help me sleep for the next 4+ years I have left and worry about possible potential issues then. Life’s too short, I might not be here in 5years!
I’m really loving my 124060 right now!
Bengal fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 08:29 AM   #4
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
Best I can tell, this problem causes the accuracy to go from outstanding to horrible after about 1.5 years. So there’s no way to know for awhile if yours is bad or not.
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 08:54 AM   #5
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
I’ve only owned one 3235 powered piece (an SD43), and when it suffered the slowing issue, I got it “fixed” by RSC, and then I immediately sold it.

I definitely won’t touch another 32xx for the foreseeable future. These watches are luxuries - pure and simple - and dealing with even the potential of poor timekeeping and trips to RSC to fix something that should’ve been fixed at source years ago isn’t very “luxury” in my book.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:02 AM   #6
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver8 View Post
I’ve only owned one 3235 powered piece (a SD43), and when it suffered the slowing issue, I got it “fixed” by RSC, and then I immediately sold it.
Sensible course of action IMO. I have two 32 based watches and they run just fine. I hope I will never have to make such a decision.

The internet is a magnet for all the horror stories and bad news travels far and fast. I expect the vast majority of 32 based watches run well, but the reported issues can't be ignored and I do wonder if in the fullness of time 32 based watches will need more frequent servicing outside of their warranty periods.

I certainly won't be parting with any of my 31 based watches for 32 based replacements. If I didn't have the 116610LV I would own or be waiting for a 126610LV by now, but my 116610LV renders it moot and is a keeper - not just for the dial.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:47 PM   #7
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver8 View Post
I’ve only owned one 3235 powered piece (an SD43), and when it suffered the slowing issue, I got it “fixed” by RSC, and then I immediately sold it.
Hi, the 126600 Sea-Dweller is a beautiful tech watch, I still have and often wear my 50th anniversary model, also for diving. I understand that you sold yours after repair
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:04 AM   #8
cuibono
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Watch: SS SkyD
Posts: 564
I had a very brief exchange with the person who wrote the article comparing the 31 and 32 series movements and who was (is?) engaged in that big thread about it. I asked him if I should stay away from the 32 series movement. He didn't think so and felt that Rolex would sort things out if necessary ("as always") That was reassuring enough that I did opt to buy a 32xx bluesy.

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
cuibono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:07 AM   #9
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
After two negative experiences with DJ41s bought in 2016 and 2017, I swore I would never buy another 32XX. Both developed problems within the first month or so of purchase. Both went to RSC but the fix was not permanent and I sold them.

Regardless, I missed the DJ look so took a leap of Rolex faith in February 2022 and bought a new DJ36. In the first 2-3 weeks it ran around -1s/day. Then it sped up and has been around +0.5s/day or more ever since. I wear it 12-14 hours/day, rest it dial up overnight and give it 40 winds weekly.

I don't have a timegrapher so can't share any serious data or other measurements. I understand the "32XX issue" might still happen. I'm grateful for the 5-year warranty and will send it to RSC at least once if I have to. If the fix is not permanent I will simply sell this one too.

In the meantime, other than the self imposed stress of watchful waiting, I'm just enjoying my new DJ and hoping for the best this time.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:09 AM   #10
JDsnewwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: JD
Location: NJ
Watch: 116710LN with BCL
Posts: 430
I'm not buying any 32XX. FWIW, I'm also not buying any of the "updated" Panerais that are now made without hacking seconds.
JDsnewwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:13 AM   #11
Cauhauna
"TRF" Member
 
Cauhauna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Cau
Location: Peachtree City
Watch: 116500
Posts: 766
does this issue include the 3285 movement in the Explorer II?
__________________
116610LN | 226570 Polar | 326934 Blue | 116500 White
2FA Enabled
Cauhauna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:25 AM   #12
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cauhauna View Post
does this issue include the 3285 movement in the Explorer II?
yes we have multiple cases of 3285s suffering. We have seen all the 32xx show issues.
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:29 AM   #13
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
It's something that bothers me. I don't own a timegrapher but I check my watches on time.is every other day and I'm sure I'd think is it today is it tomorrow that kind of stuff. The nearest RSC is an hour drive from where I live and I don't know anyone there too. My trusted watchmaker would not be able to help me so yes it's a big issue to me.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:37 AM   #14
mike morris
"TRF" Member
 
mike morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York-Miami
Watch: SUB40-DJ36-YM40
Posts: 1,066
I have negative experience 3 watches with 3235 , in this time I’m only ready to buy Daytona, but PM too expensive for me , SS impossible for MSRP.
mike morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:39 AM   #15
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike morris View Post
I have negative experience 3 watches with 3235 , in this time I’m only ready to buy Daytona, but PM too expensive for me , SS impossible for MSRP.
if your wrist can handle it don't forget the skydweller.
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:41 AM   #16
mike morris
"TRF" Member
 
mike morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York-Miami
Watch: SUB40-DJ36-YM40
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanbra View Post
if your wrist can handle it don't forget the skydweller.
My wrist 6,75 , too big sky
mike morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:39 AM   #17
mike morris
"TRF" Member
 
mike morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York-Miami
Watch: SUB40-DJ36-YM40
Posts: 1,066
I have negative experience 3 watches with 3235 , in this time I’m only ready to buy Daytona, but PM too expensive for me , SS impossible form AD.
mike morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:48 AM   #18
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,897
It’s not an issue for me. I own 3 references with 32xx movements.

Admittedly I’m not terribly concerned about time keeping as some here. I generally wear watches in rotation every couple of days and wouldn’t notice if they were running slow or fast by a minute or two.

In real world use, I have travelled with by my BLRO (2018) wearing it three weeks at a time. I’ve never missed a flight or train due to poor time keeping
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 09:56 AM   #19
Stan Cooper
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,879
I won't be buying a Rolex with a 32xx movement until I am convinced the issues have all been fixed. My daily wearer is a 16710 GMT II with a 3185 movement that has been bulletproof for 21 years, and serviced twice (2012 and 2022) by Rolex RSC. It still looks and runs like new.
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M Traveler GMT Meteorite, Seiko SSC813 quartz solar powered chronograph
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 10:53 AM   #20
Tim Plains
"TRF" Member
 
Tim Plains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: EST
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 1,173
Part of me wonders if the guys who worry about 32xx movement issues drive big three American or German vehicles and if they worry as much getting a car with problems or a lemon?

This is a forum filled with enthusiasts and ecstatics. Of course you will see an overrepresented amount of issues here vs the real world. How many sane people do you know who looked at 12 series Sub and said the lugs are too fat?
Tim Plains is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:11 AM   #21
Stan Cooper
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Plains View Post
Part of me wonders if the guys who worry about 32xx movement issues drive big three American or German vehicles and if they worry as much getting a car with problems or a lemon?

This is a forum filled with enthusiasts and ecstatics. Of course you will see an overrepresented amount of issues here vs the real world. How many sane people do you know who looked at 12 series Sub and said the lugs are too fat?
I'm not going to buy any product with known, well documented problems. It's just not worth the potential headaches.
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M Traveler GMT Meteorite, Seiko SSC813 quartz solar powered chronograph
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:40 AM   #22
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Plains View Post
Part of me wonders if the guys who worry about 32xx movement issues drive big three American or German vehicles and if they worry as much getting a car with problems or a lemon?

This is a forum filled with enthusiasts and ecstatics. Of course you will see an overrepresented amount of issues here vs the real world. How many sane people do you know who looked at 12 series Sub and said the lugs are too fat?
This 32xx issue is actually oddly reminiscent of the big Porsche 996 engine issue that eventually became a class action lawsuit, once warranties stopped paying for the fixes.

The 32xx was one of reasons I chose a 114270 over a 124270 for about the same price, but it wasn’t the only reason.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 12:06 PM   #23
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,744
I knew I was buying jewelry and not a time keeping instrument when I bought my CHNR.

Accuracy is not important to me, but Rolex should fire the chief of the R&D department for releasing this movement.
A 100$ Seiko5 performs better
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:01 AM   #24
Barada7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 431
I think it’s impossible not to consider it if you’ve read about the issues. That stated, Rolex is a good organization. They’ll make it right.
Barada7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:08 AM   #25
Harvey_D
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Boston
Posts: 33
This just made me realize, not only do I have to wait years to be "worthy" to purchase a Rolex from an AD but that when I do it'll start having issues in in less time than my wait...
Harvey_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:10 AM   #26
JoseR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Philly.
Watch: Air King, Omega AT
Posts: 2,269
I had the DJ41 from 2019 and just sold it because it wasn't getting any wrist time, but in the 2-1/2 years I owned it I didn't have any issues with it. It was at running within specs. So, maybe I got lucky, or it takes some time for the problems to start happening.
__________________
Air King 116900
Omega AT41 Gray Dial/Leather
Oris Pointer Date Roberto Clemente LE
JoseR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 11:34 AM   #27
jsobral
"TRF" Member
 
jsobral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: 5164R-5167R-5107R
Posts: 338
I'm buying Patek and Sky-Dweller/Daytona only until this gets fixed!!
jsobral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 12:16 PM   #28
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,566
My new 2021 Subdate has no issues as of yet, I purchased it new from local AD April 2021. If & when I get the text for a new gmt I won’t hesitate in purchasing one either.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:00 PM   #29
Bizcut1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bizcut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,249
I’d like to see someplace other than this Forum discussing this.

I can’t find it. Please post if you have.
Bizcut1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:26 PM   #30
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizcut1 View Post
I’d like to see someplace other than this Forum discussing this.

I can’t find it. Please post if you have.

You tried google?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.