![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which one would you keep? 15202ST or 5164A | |||
15202ST |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
79 | 62.20% |
5164A |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 37.80% |
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: around the world
Watch: 116506
Posts: 1,370
|
Can only keep one... 15202ST or 5164A?
Hey guys, I'm confronted with the fact that I need to get rid of one of these for an important purchase. My collection is rather small, but if you could keep only one, what would you keep? 15202ST from 2018, or a 5164A from 2016?
![]() ![]()
__________________
“buy what you like, and be done with it“ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: here
Watch: 214270 Mk1
Posts: 924
|
5164! Great complication
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: FL
Watch: ♛ & ✠
Posts: 943
|
keep the Jumbo imo.....more 'original' design (Genta) plus i feel it's an absolute icon compared to Aquanaut.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Watch: SD43
Posts: 511
|
5164A would the one I keep, but I have nothing in that league. Good Luck deciding
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: nyc
Posts: 734
|
5164 is slightly bigger, has a way nicer dial, better movement, actually has a seconds hand which makes it actually fun to look at since it is animated... 15202 is overrated
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,936
|
15202
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,543
|
The 5164 would get my vote.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,652
|
I’m shocked by mostly 5164 suggestions so far. For me, the 15202 is a modern classic and the no-brainer keeper between the two. It’s literally royalty.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: nyc
Posts: 734
|
Have you handled both in the flesh? That may change your mind. I owned both. I still have the 5164a. The dial is so much nicer on the 5164. It has more wrist presence. The lack of quick change date and lack of seconds hand really sucks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,652
|
Quote:
I’ve handled a 15202 many times but only a 5164 RG, never the SS. I much prefer the RO Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 2,034
|
I’d be doing anything to find another source of funds. Keep them both!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 947
|
5164a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Deep South
Watch: Daytona,GMT,Sub,DD
Posts: 732
|
I need pics to make my choice.
PDG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
The AP is the “classic” but the 5164 is a far greater display of its maker’s exceptional talent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 389
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,644
|
Me personally would keep a Royal Oak even over a Nautilus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,795
|
15202
bracelet (especially AP) > rubber |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,858
|
My gosh. I can’t believe this is even a race.
Patek all day. Way better complication. super functional. Better lume. Usable wr. Way more comfortable. No contest for me.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,358
|
Quote:
It's really based on your style/lifestyle but I've owned the 15202 and 15300 while also owning a 5167 and my PP got hands down more wrist time than either AP. I know its a 5164, but that's maybe even better! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 354
|
One watch? AP, and I am a HUGE fan of the aquanaut travel time. The 15202 is a classic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,290
|
64
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Audemars Piguet RO
Posts: 2,982
|
i am big fan of AP and the 5164a (my grail)
but 1 watch, i would go AP Jumbo anyday. versatile, both dressy and sporty at the same time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,051
|
The Jumbo is an icon so I voted for it. I would say it depends on what else is int he collection and what your daily is. If the aquanaut is your daily then it may make sense to keep it. If bother are just occasional watches you wear I would definitely keep the AP over a rubber strap Patek.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,291
|
Quote:
5164 But no one brought up the most important question - what are you freeing up funds for?!? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,162
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: HK
Posts: 1,066
|
depends on your other remaining watches
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Taipei
Posts: 294
|
If we are talking about daily or frequent wearing, I could see how someone could pick the 5164 over the 15202ST. Otherwise, there is no competition - 15202 all the way. If you were comparing it to a 5711 or 5712, it would be a lot closer, but there’s no way in my mind a rubber strap Patek that was designed to be the brands second best sports watch compares to the original and most iconic steel bracelet luxury sport watch with one of the most historically interesting watch movements ever made.
I also have to disagree that the 5164 dial looks better than the 15202. Looks are subjective, of course, but compared to the engine-turned petite tapisserie dial of the 15202, the stamped dial of the Aquanaut looks unrefined and a bit cheap to me, and this is coming from someone who would love to add a 5164 to my collection someday. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,325
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,555
|
5164a! Everyday and twice on sunday!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,309
|
15202 and it's not even close.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.