![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,426
|
Who wore it better?
Was lucky enough to receive a BB58 on strap from my wife for my birthday this year and soon after I was on the hunt for a Ranger bracelet as I really didn’t like the faux rivet bracelet and wanted the “glidelock” on the Ranger. Finally found a seller willing to part with it and it really elevates the BB58. The t-fit clasp is really convenient. For the money, these are very fun watches. It’s no BLRO but that isn’t really fair
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,955
|
Well done, that bracelet upgrade on the BB blue must be game changer!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,743
|
Great mod on the BB58!
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Submariner Date Bluesy 126613LB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,806
|
The BB58 case to bracelet symmetry looks much more attractive than the chunky BLRO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: big blue marble
Watch: 18078
Posts: 642
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 4,198
|
Looks great and a definite upgrade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,172
|
Nice OP
I’m indifferent towards the rivets, but it still perplexes me why Tudor hasn’t rolled out the improved clasp on other BBs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,622
|
Nice mod OP.
I personally like the rivet bracelet, (and the “chunky” BLRO: ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,826
|
That's a nice fit on the BB! The BLRO is perfection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,426
|
Thanks all. The Ranger bracelet is definitely an upgrade. Perfect fit.
Oddly enough, the spring bars the watch came with (my wife purchased it with the "soft touch" strap) did not fit. I used some generic spring bars and they fit but would like to get some better spring bars. I suppose I can visit my AD but does anyone know what size spring bars should be used on a BB58 on bracelet? And "chunky" BLRO is perfection, as another poster put it. I love the way it wears in the flesh. Pictures just do not do it justice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,646
|
I expect the BB58 to eventually come equipped with the T-Fit bracelet. Maybe it will be announced in March.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,847
|
Quote:
I think so too, but I’d bet they’ll keep the rivets. Also, in case anyone thinks you can just change out the clasp, you cannot! You must switch out the whole bracelet, including the end links. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.