ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 September 2009, 07:04 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: V Serial 116710LN
Posts: 284
|
GMTIIc timekeeping skills!
Well i got my new GMT on my wrist on the 4th September. Since then, i have been anally timing it against my Sky+ HD box clock. LOL
In two weeks it has lost 5 secs which i think is pretty good. The weird thing is, I have been checking it almost every day in the two weeks! Why? What am i doing? Hahaha. I keep bloody checking it like it going to stop or something. HELP! :) |
19 September 2009, 07:21 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
|
I can assure there is only need to check your watch against a reliable time source such as a quartz or radio controlled perhaps once a week.And then if necessary reset I am sure a few seconds either way will not matter that much.And all Rolex movements since
the 15XX 40 years ago have shown remarkable accuracy thats why they are called chronometers.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
20 September 2009, 12:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
I have never really been one to worry too much about +/- seconds per day....i understand all the variables that these little mechanical marvels have to deal with in day to day life.....temperature, shocks, position...etc etc
But I found this amazing.... I recently purchased a Casio Edifice Atomic watch. Updates from atomic clocks 5 times a day.....accurate to about 1 sec a year I think it was. Anyhow I decided to put my TT GMT IIC to the test to track time, using the Casio as the zero reference. I was amazed at finding my GMT over the course of 5 days was only 1 second behind the Casio.....AMAZING
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
20 September 2009, 12:31 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
Quote:
But you get over it.........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.