![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Dubai
Posts: 810
|
Would you upgrade 15500 blue to 15202 or 16202?
Was wondering if its worth the premium to upgrade or not .
If its you will you upgrade and which ref you will choose and why ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 55
|
This is what i did. I got the 15202 based on it being less money than 16202
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Switzerland
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,328
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 898
|
Everyone has their own opinion and its very subjective, but when I first saw the 16202, I loved the symmetry and the gold bridges. I prefer it, but again, so subjective to personal taste.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: UK
Posts: 62
|
Upgrading from the 15500 blue to the 16202 would be a worthwhile upgrade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 898
|
Yes...yes I would.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 936
|
how much is the premium? I have the blue 15510st and the 16202st...I think the price difference in retail price is worth it...which is like 5-10k difference. not sure if I would pay more than $10k to go from 15510st to 16202st myself.
from blue 15500st...slightly different story bc I think the shorter dial markers makes the dial feel slightly empty, while the jumbo is perfect in every aspect...especially when it comes to proportions. but still not sure if I would personally pay more than 5-10k to go from 15500st to 15202st or 16202st... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Asia
Posts: 239
|
I would definitely do it without doubt. If there's only going to be 1 RO in your collection, it has to be the Jumbo. And I'll go 15202. IMO, it'll be more collectable in the long run. But 16202 is probably more wearable. Either way, it won't go wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,679
|
Without hesitation, the jumbo is the pinnacle of AP. IMO, I would go for a late series 15202, I don't think the 16202 should command the current premium. The delta between the two could buy you another nice watch.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,379
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Boutique
Posts: 49
|
Why exactly would you recommend to go late series for 15202 if you don't mind me asking?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: Germany
Posts: 667
|
For sure, it has great proportions, especially with the case thinness. The 15500 feels too chunky in comparison.
Personally prefer the quickset of the 16202, but I also wouldn't say no to a 15202. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 828
|
Would do it in a heartbeat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 143
|
Personally the 15500 is borderline too big for me, and if a 15202 were available I would jump on it without hesitation. I would not pay the upcharge for a 16202 unless of course it is coming from the AP dealer at retail price.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,244
|
I would do it.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 93
|
Im not sure if a trade for a 16202 is worth it, being that the grey prices are nearly double the 15500. Is it double the watch? Honestly I doubt it. The 15202 on the other hand commands less of a premium and might make more sense for a trade. At retail prices however, jumbo all day every day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,555
|
Looks like I’m the only person who prefers the 15500/15510 over the 15202/16202.
I prefer the slightly bulkier nature of the 41mm RO. It’s right in between the thin Jumbo and the overly thick ROO. The seconds hands of the 41mm RO adds life to the dial. And if compared to the 15202, the quickset date function is like heaven and earth. I’m not sure if I’m correct, but I seem to remember that the lug to lug measurement of the 15500/15510 being less than the Jumbo, despite being 41mm. I do think the 16202 is a very nice watch, way better than the 15202 in terms of refinement and functionality. But the hoops to jump through for a Jumbo compared to the blue 41mm RO makes me wonder if the difference between the two is worth the effort. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
Regarding the quickset on the 15202, there is a cheat code to beat going around the clock many times, it has been documented ![]() Also regarding the size of the 15202 vs 15500, the lug to lug is very similar (maybe a tad smaller on the 15500) but the dial circumference is much, much larger on the 15500 making it seem like a bigger watch. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Asia
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
I still don’t get why people say it’s hard to adjust 15202… the semi “quick set” feature makes it much faster to adjust than a GMT.. It’s not really a cheat code when the feature is in official AP manual for calibre 2121 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Or you could get one of these bad boys too.. can change dates super fast ![]() https://www.watchprosite.com/audemar...80189.9423329/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,033
|
Quote:
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other… |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,580
|
Would you upgrade 15500 blue to 15202 or 16202?
I don’t think it’s worth it. I have two 41s and a 16202 and I do love and appreciate the 16202 but it’s not really any nicer than my 41s. I probably like the chrono the best but I got the jumbo at retail so it’s a different story- at retail it’s maybe the best watch you can get..
![]() ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Gareth
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 2,329
|
![]() Quote:
Interesting, and we have similar tastes ![]() I have 3 x 41mm Royal Oaks and love them all; ![]() ![]() ![]() But as it's already been said (correctly IMV) the Jumbo (any model.....) is absolute peak AP; ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,919
|
A 16202 is at the top of my want list (I just can't justify paying the gray markup) so I really can't say... It would depend on the upgrade cost I guess.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 72
|
My combo pieces are 16202 Blue and 15510 Green for different sizes and colors.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
|
What’s a realistic price on a 16202?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Boutique
Posts: 49
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Nederland.
Watch: The watch.!
Posts: 331
|
Tried on a 16202 of a friend of mine like the thickness, but don’t know if I like the bezel to lug ratio.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 12
|
Yes jumbo is king
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.