ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 August 2024, 07:11 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
RO 37 size comparisons
After trying on Royal oaks/chronos from 37-38-39-41 anyone have some size comparison photos of a 15550 or 15450 relative to some common reference points like a sub, DD40/DJ41, Daytona, DJ36/explorer, Speedmaster (bonus if 321), Patek aquanaut, etc or anything else you think would be helpful as a comparison? And anyone own the 15450or gray dial?
|
20 August 2024, 07:54 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,704
|
15450
vs 116505 vs 118238 |
21 August 2024, 03:04 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 464
|
RO 37 size comparisons
Grey 15550 and 124270 are mine. Lousy photo but good for size comparison I think the day date / 15450 was from Palex Better picture of the grey dial to make up for the flat/ over exposed pictures above ..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO.. |
24 August 2024, 08:07 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
Thanks all. Some shots of the 41 vs 37.
|
25 August 2024, 10:24 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 173
|
|
25 August 2024, 12:36 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: USA
Posts: 37
|
|
25 August 2024, 01:50 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
|
25 August 2024, 04:39 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 464
|
|
25 August 2024, 07:53 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 821
|
|
26 August 2024, 05:30 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
Quote:
|
|
26 August 2024, 05:54 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 464
|
RO 37 size comparisons
Quote:
I also find the lack of silver dial option in 37mm a strange choice after just one year with the 15550 redesign. It’s a crisp clean look and the lighter dials felt like they wore larger. Maybe it will get re- released in the future. I agree with your thoughts on the 41mm version ….. it just felt like too much dial / too much watch on my 7 inch wrist…… but that’s all just preference for me, it sat within the wrist edges . How it looked to me How it looked in the mirror with the slack / unadjusted bracelet. |
|
26 August 2024, 06:41 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
Quote:
|
|
25 August 2024, 03:39 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,348
|
|
26 August 2024, 04:50 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 609
|
15550st fits nicely on my 6.2inch wrist.
The fit is awesome and absolutely love the bracelet. Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk |
27 August 2024, 08:33 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 464
|
My diver is 44mm/ 50mm L2L.
It’s almost too big but I love it on rubber and don’t like it on its stock bracelet. Sportier utility bezels or chronograph functionality gives a watch more reason to be large IMO. The AP chrono on strap carries its larger size well. ..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO.. |
27 August 2024, 05:31 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,969
|
I would go smaller. I have 7.2 inch wrists and prefer 37mm or 39mm. 41mm just looks off like the others mentioned. Unless you have some giant chunky wrist.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.