ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 January 2013, 03:21 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
First purchase. I need authentication please
Hello,
I am a new member. I have been reading through posts and I have already learned a few things thanks to this forum. Recently I made a purchase of a Ladies 6917 from the 1980's Datejust with diamonds. Does it look authentic? Thank you in advance. |
2 January 2013, 04:30 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
It's ok, other than the dial is aftermarket, looks like it could do with a polish and your ok, can you take a photo of the otherside of the clasp with stampings nice and clear it will help members check to band properly.
__________________
watches many |
2 January 2013, 04:31 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,453
|
Need better shots of the dial and the clasp.
There's not enough detail, for me at least. Most will feel likewise.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
2 January 2013, 08:41 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Looks like the clasp says "siriou" ? Can't really tell, or is my mind making stuff up?
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
2 January 2013, 08:46 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
It's Rolex upside down and it doesn't look good.
|
2 January 2013, 11:32 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Thank you all. I will post more detailed pictures of the dial and clasp in a couple of days.
I don't like the fact that the dial might be aftermarket. I was told it was an original Rolex dial from factory. I wonder if they just put it together with different parts from different timepieces. One question, did this particular model ever came in a 2030 calibre? |
3 January 2013, 01:54 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Europe/Asia
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,345
|
Wonder why you didn't ask here or research it more before pulling the trigger on such an expensive watch?
|
3 January 2013, 02:13 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
The seller states he has a certified Rolex watchmaker that guarantees the watch is 100% authentic. That doesn't mean the watch is not a Frankenstein Rolex from lots of parts from different watches. I'll take it to my Rolex dealer and have it checked. I hope I didn't get burned on my first purchase. |
|
3 January 2013, 03:33 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 14
|
Questionable Purchase
I would be interested in how you made out. I have gone through what you are going through now. Keep us informed.
|
3 January 2013, 03:43 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
|
Why would you ask if its authentic or not. If I was buying a pre-owned Rolex I would have it checked before laying that kind of money on the table or after buying it from eBay or something have it checked fully at an AD. Let's be honest hear, who buys a Rolex not knowing if it's authentic or not.
I'm sure it happens all the time, but man does it make me mad when a Rolex buyer doesn't do all the homework before the purchase! |
3 January 2013, 03:49 AM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,172
|
I would pass 100% its a fake
|
3 January 2013, 03:35 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Weird how I got mixed replies. "it's good" and "100% its a fake"
A close up of the dial and the clasp will clear this up? I already have an appointment with an authorized Rolex Service Center to have it authenticated but I am curious what will be the ultimate answer from the rolexforums community. Pictures up tomorrow. |
4 January 2013, 01:16 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
I'm curious what RSC you are just walking into? If that dial is aftermarket and you "walk" into a RSC, bye bye dial... I didn't realize you could visit a RSC and have them answer questions. I thought the watch had to be sent in ?
|
4 January 2013, 01:25 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 21
|
Let us know what the RSC says... Good luck!
|
4 January 2013, 01:45 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
A lot of diamond dials are either aftermarket or original dials that had diamonds added by a jeweler. Although many enthusiasts frown upon aftermarket parts, this is one instance where I think it is okay and pretty easy to return to original later on. A genuine Rolex diamond dial would cost more than you probably paid for the entire watch.
|
4 January 2013, 12:12 PM | #16 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
Quote:
Quote:
The dial is aftermarket, that setting was not available at the time of the watches production, or a off a newer watch, but very clear pics needed to distiguish if it's a newer original dial, i doubt it. The band who knows, with those photos, but the endpieces appear to say 468b which is correct, although i cannot see that properly in such poor shots, i am kinda summising that is what they say, as it looks like that to me, the clasp looks fishy and further photos have been requested by many members from post one. To check the band link section is original you need to perform a few tests but your AD will do it now. The case looks typical of the time, ladies casebacks were engraved and yours look ok. Of course the back needs to be opened to see if there's a cal. 2030 inside their, that's the real test, the watch has certainly been mucked around with but that does not make it a total fake consider these facts, the watch has plexi crystal glass, how many fakes last over 20 years ? rolex have used sapphire crystal for 2 decades +, the case has engravings consisitant with the time, rolex has not engraved casebacks for a long time on ladies watches. The case has lug holes, it is a run of the mill ladies datejust, to my knowledge they do not engeneer fake ladies older cases, they are not collectable and worth much, it's not like an old sub worth counterfieting eg 1680..
__________________
watches many |
||
4 January 2013, 02:42 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
Fake fake fake.
|
4 January 2013, 04:09 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Ok so I just got back from the Rolex AD. This is what they had to say:
- Correct weight - Correct Serial 717XXXX and model 6917 for the style and age - Diamond Dial look original Rolex - Movement seems ok but would not know until they opened it. - Winding felt a bit rough - It has acrylic as it should from the date They would pass it as authentic but wouldn't confirm until it was looked by a tech. Some items raised a flag to them but either because they are not knowledgable on this late of model. Here they are: - Crown looked to have the Rolex crown to far to the edge - Swirls around the Rolex letters on the clasp didn't curb up correctly - The area where the reference number and model number looked too new. Recommended to send it in to Rolex and have them look it over and either service it or return it to me if it's not authentic. So I am back to square one. I must add that the person I bought it from has sent it from an address of a jewelry store that is an authorized Rolex dealer. When I did a google search of his name, it was affiliated with that jewelry store. Rolex list that store as authorized. He has a long history of selling genuine rolex. When I arrived at the AD here in town, the first thing they noticed and said was "That box you have there, is what Rolex ships the watches back in" Not that it means anything but just figured I would add that. Can I name the seller here or not? Don't want to break any forum rules. Here are the pictures. I warn you, I am not a photographer as you can tell. This one looks like the "1" is missing. It was a lighting effect. This was the best I could do. I am going to send it to the Dallas Rolex center. Have them look it over and have the final word on it. What you all think? Please explain why you post "fake fake fake" or "it's ok" I would like to be more educated. Thank you. |
4 January 2013, 04:14 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Thanks crowncollection. I hope the pictures help this time.
I am leaning towards a fake band or clasp. Although the AD said that the band appear to be solid 18K gold, they just weren't sure about the clasp or the crown on the watch. |
4 January 2013, 05:05 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
that caseback is just not something i've ever seen on a real watch.
the band is fake. the dial is awful and wayyyyy off. |
4 January 2013, 07:25 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
Well, seeing the way things are developing I guess one more dissenting opinion will not do much harm:
I believe the watch, including the bracelet, is OK, except possibly the dial which, while being original Rolex, MIGHT have had the diamonds added. |
4 January 2013, 10:50 PM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
You say the AD recommended you send it in for a service, and if it is not real they will send it back. Sorry if it is not real, it's not coming back. The diamond 6 O'clock marker looks discentered, definitely not Rolex quality. Also at the the AD, they said they weren't sure unless taking the back off ? You traveled all the way there for a authenticity check and left without having the movement checked ? IMHO we have a troll here. He knows the answer and is just fishing !
|
4 January 2013, 11:48 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
After viewing the new photos... The watch is real including the bracelet. I just compared it to another of similar vintage and everything is identical. Also, the clasp code "G" matches up with the serial number.
|
5 January 2013, 02:42 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
Thank you. |
|
5 January 2013, 05:06 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
|
Bracelet /Clasp is fishy. Coronet on clasp should have a much crisper look, especially the tips. It can lose definition when polished, but does not look like polished to me.
Picture between the lugs at 12 o'clock : The font used is OFF. I have never seen anything like that. Then a closed 6 and an open 9? Strange. Same picture, no lettering other than model no (no "Registered Design" lettering). Surface between the lugs looks polished. Have never ever seen that either. Then it's true that the watch has taken a beating and any gold plating would not have stood that without wearing off. It does not look like its worn off, so it might be the real thing, but it might be the pics? I must confess I'm not into ladies' watches but this looks OFF to me. Cannot comment on the dial, though. |
7 January 2013, 02:07 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
I do not know the answer and I am not fishing. I am trying to see I need to get my money back or keep it. |
|
7 January 2013, 04:22 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
My opinion is that other than an aftermarket diamond dial the Rest is fine
It might need a service which will set you back a couple of hundred bucks Value $2,000 ? No need to spend a fortune for a rather inexpensive Rolex by sending to the RSC |
7 January 2013, 04:58 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
No one here or anywhere can give you a 100% authentication without checking the movement.
|
7 January 2013, 07:22 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
So it looks like my assessment was just about spot on, the watch is near all original except the dial i still believe, the clasp has been overpolished, you could do with a replacement. I am with the assessment of the AD except for the dial, this dial style was not available, they should know that, but as i have stated in many posts AD know new watches that is it, you should have a different finer setting. The dial is not original i am sorry to say to this watch, and looking at the new photos, you need to see the setting very well, you also need to see wether the diamonds are exactly the same size and clarity as rolex colour match and size match all diamonds. However, i am still thinking the dial is aftermarket sorry. The best way is to remove the dial and look at the back, then you can tell 100%.
__________________
watches many |
29 January 2013, 02:16 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
After it's all set and done, I will be just a bit over 2K out of my pocket for the watch and service. This is all that it's going to be done: -Factory Movt Serv-pres prf & Crystal -Do not refinish engraved case back -Refinish case and bracelet -1 Dial-champagne, y/g markers L -1 Pair of hands -1 Second Hand -1 Winding crown -1 Clasp I'll post pictures once I get the watch back. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.