ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 April 2013, 01:33 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Signapore
Posts: 196
|
41.5 is wish!
|
25 April 2013, 01:43 PM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Whoa. Knocked it out of the park. I need a bigger wrist and way bigger bank account....
|
26 April 2013, 02:45 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
OK, when I first saw this stock photo, I was "meh," but after seeing the live pics in the other Basel thread, my jaw has dropped for this.
__________________
|
26 April 2013, 02:46 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Are the Panerai ceramics injected or solid like this one?
__________________
|
26 April 2013, 03:34 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
|
I read that it is supposedly milled from a solid block of ceramic.
http://www.watch-insider.com/news/om...selworld-2013/ |
26 April 2013, 12:31 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
It is beautiful
|
27 April 2013, 01:10 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: 116523, 79220B
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
Isn't it 42mm? The speedy 57 is and they both look the same size from the back |
|
27 April 2013, 11:13 AM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
27 April 2013, 11:38 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
|
44.25
|
27 April 2013, 02:53 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 26
|
|
27 April 2013, 04:24 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: 116523, 79220B
Posts: 49
|
|
28 April 2013, 06:34 AM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,274
|
the more i see, the more i like. two major stumbling blocks: thickness and price. the domed sapphire underneath just seems like a mistake, causing the watch to be too thick and to float on the wrist. have to see it in real life. another issue is the chemical formula on the dial. probably subtle in real life, but, not something "positive". otherwise, niiiiiice. some pix below, with a write up and video available if you click here. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.