ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 June 2014, 11:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 335
|
Platinum vs YG Which Ages Better
Im sure this has been discussed before but when it comes to the DayDate I'm leaning towards the thought platinum will hold up better and as a result age better.
I hope not to get flamed for saying this but over the years of dealing with many different clients I've seen my share of DayDate watches. The YG ones more often than not look rather beaten up and I'm thinking this has to do with the softness of gold and that platinum is more dense and heavier. Give this is a high dollar purchase I just want to make sure I'm clear on the differences. The AD I don't think I can rely on to be accurate when it comes to metal properties and I sure as hell am not well versed in the science behind them. So I look to TRF and owners to hopefully shed some light Thanks. |
19 June 2014, 11:54 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Honestly I would choose the metal that appeals to you the most, because I think with proper care either will look great for a lifetime!
|
19 June 2014, 11:57 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
Quote:
Agree with this wise man. I think the YG ones look "beaten up" just because there are more of them around. The Platinum watches are fewer and harder to come by. You shouldn't make your choice based on the criteria mentioned above. That being said, the platinum is certainly going to be nice.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
|
19 June 2014, 11:59 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,008
|
Agree with both of the wise men above.
|
19 June 2014, 12:13 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hollywood 1950
Posts: 4,103
|
Wasn't King Tutankhamen found with a YG death mask from 1352 BC ?
I think that held up pretty well. I know that his Bubbleback had stopped, but it just needed a service from RSC Thebes |
19 June 2014, 12:17 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Saskatoon SK CAN
Watch: DJ / BLNR / SUBCLV
Posts: 1,381
|
I am also a wise man supporter. There is a reason gold has been THE choice for fine goods for centuries (millennia?). Platinum is amazing. I would venture to say that you should also take a good look at how you will use the watch to determine future wear and tear.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
19 June 2014, 12:29 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 335
|
Thanks for the responses. It goes without saying this will be the dress to kill watch worn on the most special of occasions. Not worn during bar crawls (I'm too old for those anymore anyway). Also from an affordability standpoint YG is definitely more wallet friendly so to speak.
I guess the bottom line is the way I'll care for it is like women do with fine pearls. Last thing I put on and the first thing I take off. Similar to people I know that wear PP and the like. |
19 June 2014, 01:06 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
That platinum Daytona would be THE piece I would buy if I had enough clams to shell out!!
|
19 June 2014, 04:45 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
The reason YG seems more prone to scratches is the same idea with scratches on a black car vs a white car. The color of the metal shows scratches more in one than the other.
|
19 June 2014, 07:34 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
|
Pt950 is much more durable than any 18K gold alloy. It's not even close, in fact.
edit: Quote:
And yes, there's a reason you have to baby Pateks; they're not exactly known for their robustness. |
|
19 June 2014, 09:35 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
|
A quick web search suggests that platinum is softer than gold and scratches easier, which I found counterintuitive, but there it is. I don't know whether the particular alloys used by Rolex makes a difference. I suspect that platinum will not show scratches as much; many say that it develops an attractive patina from scratches over time, while gold just looks scratched.
I would get the one you like better based on appearance; it sounds like you will take good care of either so it shouldnt be a big issue. |
19 June 2014, 09:56 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
IMO, gold is timeless. Just ask the Egyptians :)
|
19 June 2014, 09:58 PM | #13 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Quote:
|
|
19 June 2014, 10:29 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bensalem, Pa
Posts: 638
|
I think the yellow gold will be more desirable in the future because gold just as a substance and element is very usable I many other aspects. I think the yellow gold will hold value better because it has multiple uses aside from a fine jewelry
|
19 June 2014, 10:34 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
|
19 June 2014, 10:37 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
You are talking about the melt-down value of gold, and I'm not sure you can apply that to Rolex gold, which uses different allows than most 18K gold manufacturers, which makes it a bit harder I believe. And 18K gold is 750 (out of 1000) but Platinum is 950 out of a 1000 (more pure Platinum in the alloy).
|
19 June 2014, 10:52 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
It doesn't really require this much babying...it is still a Rolex. I have a WG Sub that I have been wearing at least five days a week for the last six months and I do not notice any difference in wear/durability/robustness from any of my SS watches. Just wear the watch and enjoy...
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
19 June 2014, 11:15 PM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
|
Quote:
Durability is not the same as scratch resistance, either. Platinum hardly wears down at all when scratches occur, whereas gold loses material much more easily under abrasion. You might get a few superficial marks with platinum, but it lasts ages under conditions that would wear down gold very significantly. Plus platinum is denser and has a unique feel among metals. I'll take Pt950 over 18K every single time, all things being equal. Of course, they aren't, since platinum is generally far more costly than gold once it's shaped into watch parts. Of course, the durability thing isn't much of an issue for gentle use. |
|
19 June 2014, 11:22 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,000
|
|
20 June 2014, 12:10 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
I'd go white gold, it ages with great patina.
|
20 June 2014, 01:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Brendan
Location: USA
Posts: 228
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't platinum have less stretch in the band because platinum is much harder to bend than gold?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 June 2014, 02:48 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Watch: A Rolex of course.
Posts: 1,065
|
YG its just soooooo special
|
20 June 2014, 03:42 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
|
Um... sort of. While platinum does indeed have less "stretch", it's not directly related to the metals' tensile strength or ductility differences. What people refer to as "stretch" is in fact metal abrading away at the screw pins and holes, and platinum is far more resistant to this type of wear. Distortion through the material yielding (what people typically picture when they interpret "stretch" literally) isn't a factor.
|
20 June 2014, 05:06 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
With recommended upkeep they'll both keep their luster and beauty for a long time. Pick which you prefer and enjoy!
|
20 June 2014, 11:21 AM | #25 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,252
|
I should only have such problems!
|
20 June 2014, 02:13 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
It doesn't matter much. Buy whichever one appeals to you more.
|
20 June 2014, 02:31 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,497
|
Consider your interpretation of 'stretch' as corrected.
__________________
E |
20 June 2014, 03:00 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
|
All I can say is the my platinum ring has withstood 18 years of daily wear and abuse and still looks incredibly good. A quick polish and it's like new and I'm not removing metal every time I touch it up.
|
20 June 2014, 09:42 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
20 June 2014, 09:50 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,000
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.