ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 June 2008, 01:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AZ
Watch: SS 16610
Posts: 125
|
Does this look real to you all?
__________________
16610 with holes |
13 June 2008, 01:26 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: GMT 2
Posts: 324
|
It could be an after market dial. Back in the 80s they made all sorts of weird dials including stained and varnished wood.
|
13 June 2008, 01:39 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
|
Looks like - blue dial @
http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...7&itemID=14571 Black / onyx dial @ http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...8&itemID=12013 Maybe the bracelet / strap has been changed. His f/b looks like he deals in high end product. But I could be wrong. |
13 June 2008, 01:57 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Kirill
Location: USA
Posts: 11,932
|
sweet Movado
|
13 June 2008, 01:57 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
He says 1805 case....
....but, I own a 1803. My 1803 has a DISTINCT edge around the dial, as it is a snap on dial as opposed to having feet. The dial he shows does NOT have the edge. However, I do not know if the 1805 had a snap on dial.
Other than that, I would say that at least this is a redial, and maybe NOT the original mvm't. He does not say what the mvmt ref# is to be able to cross reference. Stan. |
13 June 2008, 03:56 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: steven
Location: tampa bay
Watch: 1680 18k sub
Posts: 6,672
|
I agree that it is most definitely a redial.
|
13 June 2008, 08:04 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
plus the cyclops and the date display doesn't match/align. Also, mag looks too low.
|
13 June 2008, 08:45 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
|
I have seen GOOD dials like that before, BUT that one.
You don't have to look too far with that one. C'mon guys, look at the coronet it's crooked. John. |
13 June 2008, 11:39 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
|
14 June 2008, 12:02 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
What would you expect with a watch that the bid price is 666.
|
14 June 2008, 08:27 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: steven
Location: tampa bay
Watch: 1680 18k sub
Posts: 6,672
|
could it be......SATAN???
|
15 June 2008, 03:17 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: ryder
Location: nyc
Watch: milgauss
Posts: 80
|
i second the notion..."sweet movado"
|
15 June 2008, 07:13 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10
|
why would seller risk 100% feedback and powerseller rating for fake/modified timepiece?
|
15 June 2008, 07:44 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: ryder
Location: nyc
Watch: milgauss
Posts: 80
|
maybe they dont know
|
15 June 2008, 01:23 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Leawood, Kansas
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 854
|
At worst, it's a fake. At best, it's a $h1tty redial. Either way, it's as ugly as homemade sin. Personally, I think the date magnification is wrong.
|
17 June 2008, 03:36 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
It has been settled by having it removed. I think it was a faker.
Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.