The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 September 2009, 02:36 AM   #1
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
The watch Rolex should make

Rolex should make a service free automatic watch.

When I bought my 1st Rolex as a teenager I remember the salesman saying it will last a lifetime if I take care of it.That was 25 years ago and its still looking good.I had it serviced for the 1st time a few years ago so I am good for a while I hope.
Now if the car industry can make a car go 100k miles before a tuneup dont you think Rolex can make a watch that can go 50 years without a service?
Its all about money I guess.I bought my GMT for around 1k and now they are around 6k a service than was around $100 now $600
I think its about time they make an automatic watch that doesnt need a service.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 02:50 AM   #2
valentine
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Justin
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: TT Diamond DJ
Posts: 2,809
almost like sealed transmissions?? ....I mean yes...a car will go that long..but the oil still needs changing..i think a better comparison would be a car that went 100k without needing an oil change...belts...gaskets...hoses...because when a watch is serviced...thats the same gig...gaskets...lubrication, etc..
valentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 03:01 AM   #3
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by greekbum View Post
Rolex should make a service free automatic watch.

When I bought my 1st Rolex as a teenager I remember the salesman saying it will last a lifetime if I take care of it.That was 25 years ago and its still looking good.I had it serviced for the 1st time a few years ago so I am good for a while I hope.
Now if the car industry can make a car go 100k miles before a tuneup dont you think Rolex can make a watch that can go 50 years without a service?
Its all about money I guess.I bought my GMT for around 1k and now they are around 6k a service than was around $100 now $600
I think its about time they make an automatic watch that doesnt need a service.
If you want a service free Rolex.........here it is.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Rolex--28541.jpg (63.1 KB, 465 views)
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 03:15 AM   #4
adelgado
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: daytona beach
Watch: YG Yachtmaster II
Posts: 70
I forget the numbers, but I thought an "average" rolex balance "turn" through thousands of miles a year. i thought it was like 3-4 thousand miles. But that's a constant "pace" (assuming the watch stays wound year long).

pretty good considering the tolerances, etc.

But I am lawyer not an engineer, dammit Jim!

I wonder about some the UN "freak" watches and the newer watches with different material - i think JL has some watches with newer composite materials which don't require oils? How often do they need to be serviced!
adelgado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 03:24 AM   #5
shandy
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Ian
Location: canada
Posts: 1,724
Ahh, but remember, it is in the industries interest to have regular service intervals, they make a great deal of money from it, keeps people in the loop as well!
shandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 03:36 AM   #6
sexner
"TRF" Member
 
sexner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by greekbum View Post
Rolex should make a service free automatic watch.

When I bought my 1st Rolex as a teenager I remember the salesman saying it will last a lifetime if I take care of it.That was 25 years ago and its still looking good.I had it serviced for the 1st time a few years ago so I am good for a while I hope.
Now if the car industry can make a car go 100k miles before a tuneup dont you think Rolex can make a watch that can go 50 years without a service?
Its all about money I guess.I bought my GMT for around 1k and now they are around 6k a service than was around $100 now $600
I think its about time they make an automatic watch that doesnt need a service.
I don't think we'll ever see anything "mechanical" that's maintenance free.

A service every 5 years like clockwork (pun intended) has always suited me just fine.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established.
sexner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 03:41 AM   #7
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
I think the only way that could be possible would be to develop an entirely frictionless movement with a lubricant that never dried - I think that may be beyond even Rolex's capabilities for a while yet
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 05:42 AM   #8
Toxicant
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Ron
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 374
Doesn't someone make a watch that's oil filled, seems as if that should last quite long time.
__________________
Time is precious, regulate it with class.
Toxicant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 05:49 AM   #9
YuppieKid
"TRF" Member
 
YuppieKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: West Coast, US
Posts: 1,079
If I'm not mistaken, Sinn has a new movement that has a "hassle-free" oil. I don't >

remember what it's called, but there it is. Go to watchbuys.com, the web site for their US AD. You'll see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by valentine View Post
almost like sealed transmissions?? ....I mean yes...a car will go that long..but the oil still needs changing..i think a better comparison would be a car that went 100k without needing an oil change...belts...gaskets...hoses...because when a watch is serviced...thats the same gig...gaskets...lubrication, etc..
__________________
Brandon
YuppieKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 05:49 AM   #10
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
grand seiko 9f quartz movements have a 50 year service interval. the important stuff is hermetically sealed, i believe.
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 05:58 AM   #11
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
Just because you are Greek-American...I agree..
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 06:16 AM   #12
deserted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,176
Wow can't wait the day i see that happen.
deserted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 10:20 AM   #13
IT-guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: DC
Watch: SD 126600
Posts: 195
There will never be a maintenance-free mechanism. Maybe the length of between-service intervals will evolve, but a periodic maintenance will always be required.
IT-guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 12:41 PM   #14
BOA
"TRF" Member
 
BOA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Meteorite DD
Posts: 2,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
If you want a service free Rolex.........here it is.


That one's great, but I'm holding out for the Stonehenge Calendar.
BOA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 12:50 PM   #15
YuppieKid
"TRF" Member
 
YuppieKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: West Coast, US
Posts: 1,079
Oil free escapement .... by Sinn .....

http://www.watchbuys.com/store/pc/vi...gory=0#details




Quote:
Originally Posted by YuppieKid View Post
remember what it's called, but there it is. Go to watchbuys.com, the web site for their US AD. You'll see.
__________________
Brandon
YuppieKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 12:57 PM   #16
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
You serviced your GMT ONCE in 25 years?? I'd say that's pretty good going, by any standards, and pretty darn good testimony to Rolex's quality!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2009, 11:52 PM   #17
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
Say a balance that vibrates 28800 times per hour rotates through (a conservative guess) 15mm cycle. That is 10368 meters per day, or 3784km per year. With a 5 year service interval that is a distance of 18920km. ALSO the watch is expected to put out a constant 99.996% accuracy.

Now think of a service charge of $500. That is 27cents per day. A car costs more than that to run for 24hours solid.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 12:11 AM   #18
sexner
"TRF" Member
 
sexner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
Say a balance that vibrates 28800 times per hour rotates through (a conservative guess) 15mm cycle. That is 10368 meters per day, or 3784km per year. With a 5 year service interval that is a distance of 18920km. ALSO the watch is expected to put out a constant 99.996% accuracy.

Now think of a service charge of $500. That is 27cents per day. A car costs more than that to run for 24hours solid.
x2

The benefits of the cost of service at 5 year intervals in order to maintain an exquisite machine cannot be overstated.

__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established.
sexner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 01:29 AM   #19
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxicant View Post
Doesn't someone make a watch that's oil filled, seems as if that should last quite long time.
IIRC, Bell & Ross had a diver's watch that was filled with liquid. I also believe that had to do more with increasing the depth rating (something like 10k meters or beyond) as opposed to service. There was also a rubber caseback, allowing it to expand and contract.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 01:49 AM   #20
PHPuser
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: John
Location: River City Ky
Watch: none anymore
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
Say a balance that vibrates 28800 times per hour rotates through (a conservative guess) 15mm cycle. That is 10368 meters per day, or 3784km per year. With a 5 year service interval that is a distance of 18920km. ALSO the watch is expected to put out a constant 99.996% accuracy.

Now think of a service charge of $500. That is 27cents per day. A car costs more than that to run for 24hours solid.
And the added benefit ypoui don't have to put gas in it
PHPuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 01:53 AM   #21
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexner View Post
x2

The benefits of the cost of service at 5 year intervals in order to maintain an exquisite machine cannot be overstated.

I agree. Rolex changes any worn parts in the movement when you have a service no matter how many parts are needed. Thats awsome. I feel that is one part of having a Rolex Service Center do the work on the watch that a private watchman could not compete with. They have all the new gears, jewels, pins, ect right there at their disposal. Its not even an issue to check the parts and toil with the decision to replace them or not. They just make it practically new when in doubt.
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 05:14 AM   #22
dieseldragon
"TRF" Member
 
dieseldragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Ian
Location: Spain
Watch: Ω & ♛
Posts: 1,321
No way any one could engineer a virtually service free mechanical device.

If we comparing to engines, service intervals are increased by using bigger oil capacities and bigger oil filters (for example Renault Trafic 1.9 dci has a 25 litre sump!! reducing service intervals) Cadillac Northstar V8´s use electronics to manage the engine in such a way that it will shut down parts of the engine that are being abused. Its said that you can run this engine on virtually zero oil, because electronics will shut down cylinders and restart others as temperatures rise and fall..

The poor Rolex just has get its head down and chug away till it either dies or someone oils it. I love honest engineering, no bells and whistles, it just does what it has to...
dieseldragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 05:20 AM   #23
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You think these folks that make watches aren't on the cutting edge of technology? Lots of things moving and in contact with each other.

Now have you been following the lube-free silica based parts in some of the Pateks and the UN watches? It will get better. Even the Omega co-axials purport to require less service, but I've also read that their service interval is an aspiration rather than a reality at this point.

The car analogy is somewhat flawed too. No car is maintenance free for 100,000 miles, only elements of it. Oil, tires, battery, other fluids, wipers, etc all need changing. Even the things with a long-service interval are based on the fact that the accountants get to vote against the engineers. BMW is a perfect example, sell the car with free maintenance and then only do the minimum necessary to get through the warranty period. Like my cars, I chose to take proper care of my watches and figured that in to the ownership cost when I opted to buy them.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 05:41 AM   #24
SDDS
"TRF" Member
 
SDDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Yazan
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,782
i would luv to see if it happens
__________________
Patek Philippe 5167
Patek Philippe 5905P black dial
Rolex Deepsea 116660 M series
Rolex Oysterquartz 17000 N series
Rolex OP 41MM 124300 Green Dial
SDDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 10:50 AM   #25
Ike
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHat View Post
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You think these folks that make watches aren't on the cutting edge of technology? Lots of things moving and in contact with each other.

Now have you been following the lube-free silica based parts in some of the Pateks and the UN watches? It will get better. Even the Omega co-axials purport to require less service, but I've also read that their service interval is an aspiration rather than a reality at this point.

The car analogy is somewhat flawed too. No car is maintenance free for 100,000 miles, only elements of it. Oil, tires, battery, other fluids, wipers, etc all need changing. Even the things with a long-service interval are based on the fact that the accountants get to vote against the engineers. BMW is a perfect example, sell the car with free maintenance and then only do the minimum necessary to get through the warranty period. Like my cars, I chose to take proper care of my watches and figured that in to the ownership cost when I opted to buy them.
I've got one of the BMWs with free maintenance. The free oil changes are every 15,000 miles. However, the people that follow that are having so much sludge in their engines that they are having problems with them. I have mine done every 5000 miles at an independant shop where they don't touch the computer so I still get a free one at the dealer.

My dad's Rolex I mentioned in my other post stopped about 5 years ago. He was pretty upset because the salesman told him when he bought it in the seventies that it would never need anything done to it. I guess some people will believe that. I can't see how moving parts can last that long without the oils getting dirty or breaking down.
Ike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2009, 11:26 AM   #26
nektar
"TRF" Member
 
nektar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempoKing View Post
Just because you are Greek-American...I agree..
Just because you are both Greeks, i agree
nektar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.