ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

OPK · 30 September 2009, 05:10 AM

Saw a picture of Phil on the back of today's WSJ where it looks like he's wearing a SS GMT. Found a picture online during the same photo opp where it looks like it may even be a ceramic - has the PCLs (below).

Interestingly, he was wearing a different watch while he was playing (leather banded Milgauss maybe?), then switched to the GMT for the trophy presentation.

Stupid noo-b question, but is he a big Rolex fan?

Cheers, Chris

Leasky · 30 September 2009, 05:14 AM

They - Rolex - may have been one of the sponsors and therefore certain winners etc may be contracted / required to slap on a Rolex.

Tough job eh?

SDDS · 30 September 2009, 05:16 AM

yes he is a big Rolex fan.. i used to c him on "Watch Time" magazine.. i cant remember which issue it was..but he had various Rolex collections

submariner1 · 30 September 2009, 05:39 AM

He is an employee of Rolex, he is "paid" via watches instead of money. Rolex does not pay people to wear there watches.

dpj17 · 30 September 2009, 05:55 AM

I'm pretty sure he plays with a Cellini on a leather strap in most tournaments, then afterwards looked like he switched to the GMT II-C. He sponsored by them after all and I'm sure Phil demands a hefty ransom from Rolex to be seen wearing their watches and used in their ads, no?

Smokeytreats · 30 September 2009, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpj17

I'm pretty sure he plays with a Cellini on a leather strap in most tournaments, then afterwards looked like he switched to the GMT II-C. He sponsored by them after all and I'm sure Phil demands a hefty ransom from Rolex to be seen wearing their watches and used in their ads, no?

Yes this is true, he wears it very tight as well. If one thinks that Rolex does not pay Phil Mickelson to wear the watches that is insane. Phil is probably the most liked player on Tour worldwide and probably demands a very healthy price on top of pretty much any watch he wants to wear. I like his "choice" with the GMT though. I have seen him in person wearing a Daytona as well. I am sure he has em all.

submariner1 · 30 September 2009, 06:56 AM

Then I am insane because they DON'T pay him, they give him watches. Thats why Tiger went to Tag, because his manager wanted payment for tudor and Rolex doesn't work that way. I'm not guessing here, I know this as a fact.

mach330 · 30 September 2009, 02:48 PM

i always wonder why phil wears the cellini. it just looks too small and tight on him. my gmt is pretty comfy on me when i play golf .

AK Blackhawk · 30 September 2009, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mach330

i always wonder why phil wears the cellini. it just looks too small and tight on him. my gmt is pretty comfy on me when i play golf .

Really? I seem to not be able to wear any watch when I'm golfing. Just feels like it limits my movement somehow even though I know it doesn't in reality. I may have to give it a try with my soon to be arriving GMTIIc though.

Speed · 30 September 2009, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by submariner1

Then I am insane because they DON'T pay him, they give him watches. Thats why Tiger went to Tag, because his manager wanted payment for tudor and Rolex doesn't work that way. I'm not guessing here, I know this as a fact.

Hmm...Not a fan of Tags. Nope. Tried to like 'em, but nope.

Armand · 1 October 2009, 06:44 AM

I can´t talk, of course, about the financial aspects, but as a former National Trap shooter, I can assure you that

A) we Sport´s People are a superstitious kind of people!

and

B) too much mass ( read: heavy watch ) on a swinging mass ( read: wrist ) can and will influence "harmonics"!

I think "A" is waayyy more important ;-)

Hermann

kelly56 · 1 October 2009, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK Blackhawk

Really? I seem to not be able to wear any watch when I'm golfing. Just feels like it limits my movement somehow even though I know it doesn't in reality. I may have to give it a try with my soon to be arriving GMTIIc though.

I'm with you. I leave my watch and wedding band at home when golfing.

AK Blackhawk · 1 October 2009, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kelly56

I'm with you. I leave my watch and wedding band at home when golfing.

At least I'm not the only one!

watchnut · 1 October 2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK Blackhawk

Really? I seem to not be able to wear any watch when I'm golfing. Just feels like it limits my movement somehow even though I know it doesn't in reality. I may have to give it a try with my soon to be arriving GMTIIc though.

I'm told that if you're wearing a DSSD and you can get it moving just right you can pick up 20 yds off the tee!

dpj17 · 1 October 2009, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchnut

I'm told that if you're wearing a DSSD and you can get it moving just right you can pick up 20 yds off the tee!

Yeah, but will it go straight? Doubt it with me

. I also leave the watch and wedding ring in the bag when I play just because I don't like to think about anything moving around on my wrist when I swing, not that it matters anyway, 13.3 Index and rising fast. The only reason Phil wears that Cellini is that it is almost non-existent on his wrist and does not move a centimeter. I can't recall seeing another really good pro who wears a watch while playing. Is it really true Rolex pays in watches? Phil makes 40+ Million a year, mostly from endorsements, and if this is a fact he just moved a notch up in my book.

30 September 2009, 05:16 AM	#3
SDDS "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Yazan Location: Canada Posts: 4,782	yes he is a big Rolex fan.. i used to c him on "Watch Time" magazine.. i cant remember which issue it was..but he had various Rolex collections __________________ Patek Philippe 5167 Patek Philippe 5905P black dial Rolex Deepsea 116660 M series Rolex Oysterquartz 17000 N series Rolex OP 41MM 124300 Green Dial

30 September 2009, 05:55 AM	#5
dpj17 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: In the Middle Posts: 898	I'm pretty sure he plays with a Cellini on a leather strap in most tournaments, then afterwards looked like he switched to the GMT II-C. He sponsored by them after all and I'm sure Phil demands a hefty ransom from Rolex to be seen wearing their watches and used in their ads, no? __________________ Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat

30 September 2009, 05:14 AM	#2
Leasky "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Colin Leask. Location: Scotland, UK. Watch: 118238 YG DD. Posts: 723	They - Rolex - may have been one of the sponsors and therefore certain winners etc may be contracted / required to slap on a Rolex. Tough job eh?

30 September 2009, 05:39 AM	#4
submariner1 Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: illinois Posts: 95	He is an employee of Rolex, he is "paid" via watches instead of money. Rolex does not pay people to wear there watches.

30 September 2009, 06:56 AM	#7
submariner1 Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: illinois Posts: 95	Then I am insane because they DON'T pay him, they give him watches. Thats why Tiger went to Tag, because his manager wanted payment for tudor and Rolex doesn't work that way. I'm not guessing here, I know this as a fact.

30 September 2009, 02:48 PM	#8
mach330 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: The OC Watch: Daytona,GMT,PAM 90 Posts: 394	i always wonder why phil wears the cellini. it just looks too small and tight on him. my gmt is pretty comfy on me when i play golf .

1 October 2009, 06:44 AM	#11
Armand Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Hermann Location: Middle of Europe Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B Posts: 413	I can´t talk, of course, about the financial aspects, but as a former National Trap shooter, I can assure you that A) we Sport´s People are a superstitious kind of people! and B) too much mass ( read: heavy watch ) on a swinging mass ( read: wrist ) can and will influence "harmonics"! I think "A" is waayyy more important ;-) Hermann

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)