The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 July 2010, 07:00 AM   #1
Sixshooter
"TRF" Member
 
Sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Caleb
Location: Lubbock TX. USA
Watch: Crude Prices
Posts: 1,103
GMTIIc vs. Yachtmaster...

Hello everybody! I'm new around here and though I would get some expert advice from anyone willing. Ok, I currently have a Explorer 1 and it is my only nice watch. But I'm looking for something a little more dressy with a bit more flash. I'm torn between the SS GMTIIc and the SS/Platinum YM. My question is, which is the dressier looking watch? I'm thinking YM, but the ceramic has a good bit of flash as well. I don't ever see anyone with a YM in my area, which appeals to me, different is good at times! But I sure love the look of the Ceramic GMT as well. If you could pick only one for a bit dressier look, what would you choose? Thank you for any help and as always pics are much appreciated!

Btw, do you think the YM will be upgraded to a better clasp at anytime??
Sixshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 07:02 AM   #2
sakuraba
"TRF" Member
 
sakuraba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
IMHO if you want a dressy tool watch (how's that for an oxymoron ), you can't do much better than the YM.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black
F 16710 GMT Pepsi
F 16570 Explorer II white
T 16600 SD
D 16610 LV

"fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland
sakuraba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 07:14 AM   #3
MY-WATCH
"TRF" Member
 
MY-WATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,781
If u don't mind having two GMT watches (ur explorer and GMT IIc) then you should go for it
MY-WATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 07:22 AM   #4
ersnyder
2024 Pledge Member
 
ersnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by sakuraba View Post
IMHO if you want a dressy tool watch (how's that for an oxymoron ), you can't do much better than the YM.
I agree with Jib, the YM's dressy at the same time being a "tool" watch. And, if unique is what you seek, go with the YM! Welcome to TRF!!
ersnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 07:30 AM   #5
vuhuynh1163
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Vu Huynh
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 13
I would go for the YM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MY-WATCH View Post
If u don't mind having two GMT watches (ur explorer and GMT IIc) then you should go for it
I would go for the YM.
BTW, The Explorer I does not have second time (GMT) function.
vuhuynh1163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:32 AM   #6
Maxseven
"TRF" Member
 
Maxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
Either of the two would be a fine choice, provided they were the SS GMT-Master IIc or the Yachtmaster II WG (44mm).

Flip a coin!
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

Maxseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:46 AM   #7
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
Yachtmaster is classy!
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:46 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
Neither of those watches are "dressy" - they are both blinged up sport watches.. (although the YM doesn't really have a serious "function")

If you want something dressy, why not give the Datejust II some consideration........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:50 AM   #9
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
I agree with Tools. The DateJust is a Dress Watch, however I would consider the Yacht Master to appear to be more dressy than the GMTIIC.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:51 AM   #10
Shadi
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Watch: SS DJII
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
If you want something dressy, why not give the Datejust II some consideration........
x2
Shadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 09:53 AM   #11
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixshooter View Post

Btw, do you think the YM will be upgraded to a better clasp at anytime??
Welcome to TRF for a start!!
Glad you found us.......

To answer your last question,I certainly hope they do sooner rather than later!!!
I ended up doing it myself with a GMTIIc bukcle...Looks and feels great!!

My choice would be the YM although the GMTc is a stunning watch also...I think you should try 'em both and decide at your AD.....
Enjoy the site,
Rob.
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:13 AM   #12
Sixshooter
"TRF" Member
 
Sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Caleb
Location: Lubbock TX. USA
Watch: Crude Prices
Posts: 1,103
Sleddog, may I ask where you may source a GMTIIc clasp?
Sixshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:35 AM   #13
Watchdog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,817
Out of those two, FOR YOUR CRITERIA, I would choose the YM.

But while I like the YM, I LOVE the GMTIIC.

Either way, you win!

Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:44 AM   #14
Benwah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ottawa ON Canada
Posts: 89
I would choose the GMT2C as the silver/grey dial of the YM does not do anything to me...But hey go with your personal preference, two nice choices...
Benwah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:01 AM   #15
levessh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Watch: GMT II BLNR
Posts: 40
I would vote for the YM. I have always worn my YM for "dressier" look.
levessh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:15 AM   #16
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
For dress I'd say the djii as suggested. Beyond that I think you'll wear the gmt2c much more that the YM. A more versatile watch IMO. Also with the added complication it makes the watch special. Both can be dressed up or down. Welcome to TRF and enjoy the hunt. Slap on a DJII and see what that does!!!!!
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:19 AM   #17
Maxseven
"TRF" Member
 
Maxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
I don't understand all this talk about what is "dressy" or "dressier." To me, any Rolex model is a great choice from casual to black-tie.

It's all about how you execute your wardrobe, and the watch is part of it.

No rubber or NATO straps for formal though.
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

Maxseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:38 AM   #18
Sixshooter
"TRF" Member
 
Sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Caleb
Location: Lubbock TX. USA
Watch: Crude Prices
Posts: 1,103
I guess I should redefine "dress watch". For me dressing up 90% of the time is nice jeans and a starched shirt, pretty casual by most standards! So I guess I should say a little dressier sports watch if you will. I tried the DJII on and while I thought it was a beautiful piece, I felt like I would need a few more years on me to pull it off. Myself being less than a quarter-century old I feel the sport models suit me best. I haven't seen a YM in person out in the wild however, but I'm guessing it is pretty flashy. More so than than the GMTIIc I assume. I guess what I'm asking is which one could look more "formal" when needed...
Sixshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 04:24 PM   #19
ayecarumba
"TRF" Member
 
ayecarumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: ATL
Watch: the one I'm wearin
Posts: 526
A true dilemma...

...Like asking to choose which of your children you love the most!

Welcome to TRF!

You can't go wrong with either IMHO. They are amongst the snazziest of the sport/tool lineup:

1. Both have Polished Center Link bracelets (PCLs). The GMT IIC's is the more advanced with the expandable link and updated bracelet...at moments glance though, both are very similar so this is a personal preference....

2. Both have a glossier bezel feature than the explorer in that the GMT IIC is the ceramic which has a nice gloss black sheen (with PVD gold or platinum markings) and the YM has the nice raised platinum bezel.

3. The upgraded YM bracelet rumor/threads have been circulating here for quite some time. I have heard and seen the rumor, but the "riddle, wrapped inside an enigma..." that is Rolex S.A. has better security than (insert world's best intelligence agency in your opinion here)!
..So we may only know about it if and when Rolex decides to unveil it. This is a major harumph point for me as well as I believe the YM bracelet is deserving of this makeover.

What a great dilemma to face!

Let us know what you decide and enjoy the hunt!


--Paul

This is a toughie. I like what others have said in that you should try to get into an AD and try them both. I believe that would be helpful (I don't know what I'm looking for but I'll know it when I see it!).
__________________


"Whether we wake or we sleep, Whether we carol or weep, The Sun with his planets in chime,
Marketh the going of Time." --Edward Fitzgerald
ayecarumba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 04:29 PM   #20
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,018
DJ or DJII
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 04:32 PM   #21
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixshooter View Post
Hello everybody! I'm new around here and though I would get some expert advice from anyone willing. Ok, I currently have a Explorer 1 and it is my only nice watch. But I'm looking for something a little more dressy with a bit more flash. I'm torn between the SS GMTIIc and the SS/Platinum YM. My question is, which is the dressier looking watch? I'm thinking YM, but the ceramic has a good bit of flash as well. I don't ever see anyone with a YM in my area, which appeals to me, different is good at times! But I sure love the look of the Ceramic GMT as well. If you could pick only one for a bit dressier look, what would you choose? Thank you for any help and as always pics are much appreciated!

Btw, do you think the YM will be upgraded to a better clasp at anytime??
Hi and welcome to TRF.

Go with the SS/Pt. YM - it's still the ONLY Rolex out there with a solid Platinum dial and bezel.

Is it blingy? Yes, it is!! Under certain light conditions, it will blow you away. Just take a look at Charlie Sheen's watch in Two & a Half Men and you'll know what I'm talking about.

Yes, it's a blinged up Sub.........but, hey, who's complaining??!!

Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 04:37 PM   #22
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,129
Yep, had my YM for about 1 year.
I love it still, think it is a real stunner!

But, it had to move for the TT GMT2C....
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 04:42 PM   #23
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerardus View Post
Yep, had my YM for about 1 year.
I love it still, think it is a real stunner!

But, it had to move for the TT GMT2C....
Shame on you, ya double-crosser!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 05:06 PM   #24
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
I tried a GMT IIc on earlier and now I can't get it out of my mind, that is, when I'm not thinking about the DSSD that I tried on as well....
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 05:47 PM   #25
rickyslam
"TRF" Member
 
rickyslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
I'd go for the GMT II C. Thats a great tool watch. Looks amazing and goes with everything.
rickyslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:15 PM   #26
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixshooter View Post
Hello everybody! I'm new around here and though I would get some expert advice from anyone willing. Ok, I currently have a Explorer 1 and it is my only nice watch. But I'm looking for something a little more dressy with a bit more flash. I'm torn between the SS GMTIIc and the SS/Platinum YM. My question is, which is the dressier looking watch? I'm thinking YM, but the ceramic has a good bit of flash as well. I don't ever see anyone with a YM in my area, which appeals to me, different is good at times! But I sure love the look of the Ceramic GMT as well. If you could pick only one for a bit dressier look, what would you choose? Thank you for any help and as always pics are much appreciated!

Btw, do you think the YM will be upgraded to a better clasp at anytime??

Hey Six,

Welcome from 2 hours South. Midland here.......

The YM is a very cool watch and the TT models are a bit "dressy". Personally, I think that the Explorer has the distinction of being able to look as good with cut-offs or a tux better than any other ROLEX. Just my opinion though......I love the new GMT's, but I've not warmed to the "fat" lugs on the maxi case yet.

I'd tell you to check the AD's down here, but you'll get a far better deal on TRF. Both have good selections though, so they are good places to do some tire kicking. PM me If I can help.

Patrick
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:16 PM   #27
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Shame on you, ya double-crosser!!
If he's a double crosser, what does that make you????

__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:18 PM   #28
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I faced the same dilemna so I ended up getting both. I also put a Daytona clasp (same as GMTIIc) on my YM since Rolex wouldn't oblige us. The clasp was very difficult to obtain but well worth the effort. After the change, I enjoy wearing both watches equally but the YM does feel more special. It's also surprisingly stealthier than the GMTIIc or my other watches. Have you seen some of the bling out there these days?



kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:35 PM   #29
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benwah View Post
I would choose the GMT2C as the silver/grey dial of the YM does not do anything to me...But hey go with your personal preference, two nice choices...
I agree 100%!! I had one for about 2 months and could not get used to the mono tone of the watch. It is silver on silver. I think that is why it really does not sell as well even though it is a great looking watch. all the other sport watches have at least 2 colors. I never noticed this fact until I owned one and used it for a couple of days.
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2010, 02:28 PM   #30
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixshooter View Post
Hello everybody! I'm new around here and though I would get some expert advice from anyone willing. Ok, I currently have a Explorer 1 and it is my only nice watch. But I'm looking for something a little more dressy with a bit more flash. I'm torn between the SS GMTIIc and the SS/Platinum YM. My question is, which is the dressier looking watch? I'm thinking YM, but the ceramic has a good bit of flash as well. I don't ever see anyone with a YM in my area, which appeals to me, different is good at times! But I sure love the look of the Ceramic GMT as well. If you could pick only one for a bit dressier look, what would you choose? Thank you for any help and as always pics are much appreciated!

Btw, do you think the YM will be upgraded to a better clasp at anytime??
for the dressy watch I would go with the DJ. But from your choices gmtiic very sharp.

YM not for me..It is dull in my eyes..only the close up camera shots of YM look good otherwise it is not so sharp in real. IMHO. When I had it for just two weeks and while I was wearing it my wife did not even notice it.. she said she thought I was still wearing my silver dial Seiko..
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.