ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 January 2011, 11:53 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 196
|
Atomic clock - I've finally done it...
...I managed to last 6 weeks from the day I purchsed my GMT2c.
Yesterday however, despite my best efforts, I synchronised my watch to an atomic clock following website. In a depressingly predictable manner I am now checking my watch every few hours. It is satisfying that it hasn't lost any time whatsoever (yet!) but despite this it is bordering on obsessive/idiotic. Is this what the life of a WIS has to be like? Has anyone managed to beat this addiction? |
12 January 2011, 11:58 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
13 January 2011, 01:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
I would say that checking your watches's accuracy "every few hour" is excessive.
Have you considered how long it takes for the signal from the Atomic Clock to reach your computer? It may be off by several milliseconds right there. |
13 January 2011, 01:50 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Ralph
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Submariner 16613N
Posts: 96
|
I set mine to the time listed on this website. I'm gaining a few seconds every day, but no big deal. I too wonder how long it takes to get the signal over the internet and on my display. It could be off depending on the speed of the connection.
|
13 January 2011, 01:51 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
|
|
13 January 2011, 01:53 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Lucky
Location: Ohio USA
Watch: TT-Tona/EXII/Tudor
Posts: 696
|
Dont' worry, the romance will wear off with time.....But for how long....?... Well in my case was that "When the milk dry up....! "
Enjoy Your Watch ! I too have two atomic clocks (However, wife and daughter said they are ugly Clocks? )
__________________
Astroboy "Life Is Not A Problem To Be Solved But A Reality To Be Experienced" "JJ - Your smile takes all my troubles away!" |
13 January 2011, 01:59 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,984
|
Quite normal for a lover of mechanical watches. Try to check just once every day, though. Otherwise you might go insane.
|
13 January 2011, 02:10 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
|
Too late for that!!
__________________
|
13 January 2011, 02:14 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary Scott
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: GMT Coke
Posts: 67
|
As a compulsive techy I like to put you mind at easy.
Yes there is a small delay between the atomic clock and your computer but it typically is less than your ability to quantify. Further if what your validating is accuracy of the movement, +/-X seconds, the actual time is not as important as repearability of the measurement. So check you watch at the same time every day and pick a time when Internet traffic is low and use a lock site as close to you as possible to minimize routing problems and any accuracy deviation will be in the noise level and so small that you will be incapable of measuring it without very expensive electronics. And make a number of measurements over several weeks, every morning at 3am, and average the measurements. Then enjoy your watch is you can stay awake after getting up every morning at 3am. |
13 January 2011, 02:16 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Joel
Location: Renton, WA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 2,990
|
Quote:
the last time for me took 5 weeks before checks which was about 5 days ago... was self regulating for 1st few days than crystal straight up for the duration and it was 4 seconds slow.
__________________
___/ /_/ /_____ 16610LV; Ball Diver EMT II \:::::::::::::::/ ~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
13 January 2011, 02:19 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary Scott
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: GMT Coke
Posts: 67
|
Damn I hate my iPad. Lock should be clock & is in the last sentence should be if.
|
13 January 2011, 02:26 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
Use time.gov |
|
13 January 2011, 02:55 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Northville, MI,US
Watch: Smstr 600m BigBlue
Posts: 412
|
I'm checking maybe once a day- in the a.m.
What makes it worse is that I own a Citizen that automatically checks/resets the time every day- so I have a readily available source. Arghhh. The good thing is that both of my mechanicals are accurate.
__________________
RedwinGV |
13 January 2011, 02:56 AM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
Quote:
I was obsessed with accuracy and set my watches daily by WWV. When I bought my first mechanical after all those years of quartz and NIST, I started to become less obsessed. I still want my watches to be accurate, but my expectations are far less demanding and I'm a lot more laid back about it. It really doesn't do much good to check every few hours. Every day or so and getting an average for a week should be sufficient to know whether your watch is within specs or not. Mechanicals are never going to blow you away with stable timekeeping and they will drift over time and require periodic regulation. I like to set mine slow by about 30 seconds and then reset them when they are about 30 seconds fast, as mine gain a couple of seconds a day. That's more than enough accuracy for my needs. I still like to run little tests from time to time just for fun, like when I wore both my Rolex watches for about several weeks recently.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
13 January 2011, 03:12 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Ralph
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Submariner 16613N
Posts: 96
|
Thanks dooder. I went on the www.time.gov website and I'll see how close my watch stays to that time.
|
13 January 2011, 03:16 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Quote:
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
|
13 January 2011, 03:37 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 168
|
Go on, you know you want to check the Atomic Clock right now... It'll take 5 secs. No one will know. Do it. Just a peek. Quick.
|
13 January 2011, 03:46 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I used to check my watch by the Atomic clock all the time....I just got tired of wearing that lead suit.
|
13 January 2011, 04:48 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,073
|
I am with you. Impossible to type with that thing.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ |
13 January 2011, 04:58 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 36
|
LOL, After a few weeks you will be healed.
|
13 January 2011, 05:00 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Snook
Location: USS Bluefish
Watch: Pam24, Seamaster
Posts: 883
|
W-I-S it's not just a disease...it's an EXPENSIVE disease!!!
__________________
Truth will rise above falsehood as oil above water. - Miguel De Cervantes |
13 January 2011, 05:30 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: LonZealand
Posts: 828
|
I've had a sub for 12 yrs and have never really checked it's accuracy!!! It used to run a little fast and when it got to about 5 mins ahead I'd just change it. It's just had it's first service (came back immaculate) and it still hasn't dawned on me to check it - seems I'm the odd one here!!!
|
13 January 2011, 05:48 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Watch: GMT-II Pepsi
Posts: 1,051
|
i don't wear mine enought to keep it running for 6 weeks!
__________________
Lug hole loyalist! |
13 January 2011, 05:58 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
Brace yourself for a lot of depreciating, insulting, tacky comments from most of the TRF members here.
Welcome to the club on this issue regardless. Its not that unusual. At least we are not obsessing about the minute and second hands lining up on the indexes perfectly which another TRF member came up with the other day. I think that was novel enough to most of the "gentlemen" on TRF to avoid crucifixion. To make it all the more complicated here are a couple more time sites: US Naval Observatory time: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/simpletime.html US Naval Oceanography time: http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/time Greenwich Mean time: http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/tim.../pacific-time/ Good luck with this...and just ignore all the self appointed WIS gods who may offer irreverent, sophomoric comments. |
13 January 2011, 06:13 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: EC/Midwest
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,016
|
I did the same at first, OP.
Now I leave it alone- I like being early due to my watch's +2.5 sec/day. |
13 January 2011, 09:32 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Midwest, USA
Watch: Enough is enough!!
Posts: 597
|
I only have atomic clocks all around my house and use one specific clock to sync my Rolex to every 24 hours. Only losing +/- 0.5 secs a day. I guess I should let my obsession go and live my life/watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.