The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 January 2011, 12:01 AM   #1
jskim
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 27
116710 vs. 116610 vs. 16610.

What should I get?

I want a watch which will depreciate the least.

My budget is 15k so if you guys have any other recommendations, I'd be very pleased to take them.
jskim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:06 AM   #2
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by jskim View Post
What should I get?

I want a watch which will depreciate the least.

My budget is 15k so if you guys have any other recommendations, I'd be very pleased to take them.
that is going to be a tough one. it all depends on how much discount you can get.

if you like the new super case/ceramic insert - 116710, 116610

if you like the more original/smaller case and aluminium insert - 16710, 16610

with a budget of 15K, assuming you want SS models, im sure a 116710 and a 16610 is quite possible (discount)? im sure our US members can advise on that more clearly
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:16 AM   #3
slevin kelevra
"TRF" Member
 
slevin kelevra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 631
Surely you want the watch you like the best?? Not the one that will depreciate the least?

Strange motivation for buying a watch IMO.


If there were two watches, one that you really liked the look of, the other you didnt like as much but the experts told you that it would depreciate less. Would you actually buy the one you preferred less??



Good luck though!
slevin kelevra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:22 AM   #4
jskim
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by slevin kelevra View Post
Surely you want the watch you like the best?? Not the one that will depreciate the least?

Strange motivation for buying a watch IMO.


If there were two watches, one that you really liked the look of, the other you didnt like as much but the experts told you that it would depreciate less. Would you actually buy the one you preferred less??



Good luck though!
To be honest, I like all 3 about the same.

Now the only factor I take in as a consideration is long term value.
jskim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:22 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
+ 1,000!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:37 AM   #6
tanndonn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: texas
Watch: EXP II, 243, PO
Posts: 131
With that kind of budget you have plenty of room to experiment with each one, if you don't prefer the one you originally select go to the next by moving it here in the sales forum, pickup the next in line and see how it goes. You are in an enviable position, I am trying to figure which direction to go between the 16610LV and a GMT II 3185, but unfortunately my budget is $127.00, I think that what you are going to find is that all the varied recommendations will only complicate your decision. Do your research and make an informed decision, there is nothing wrong if you end up wanting or preferring a different model. Most everyone here started out needing that 1 Rolex only to find out that they couldn't live without the next one. Best of luck with your decision and keep us informed of your thoughts throughout the process and which one you decide upon.
tanndonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 12:55 AM   #7
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
With a budget of 15K, heck you can buy all of them! You can go old school with the 16610 or you can go with the latest & greatest - maxi dial, improved clasp, ceramic bezel, etc... Of course of the 3, one offers a GMT feature.

Good Luck!
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 02:42 AM   #8
slevin kelevra
"TRF" Member
 
slevin kelevra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by jskim View Post
To be honest, I like all 3 about the same.

Now the only factor I take in as a consideration is long term value.
Ah, I see.

A nice position to be in then!

Good luck and be sure to let us know what you decide!
slevin kelevra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 02:50 AM   #9
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
Hmmmm..

well, let me see.............

... Where did I put that crystal ball..............



I suppose that I'll have to guess.... I would say that by the time that one or the other actually takes over in such a race, probably 20 years will have passed. By that time, many more Subs will be sold than GMT's; so the GMT may have a slight edge.. maybe not..

The 16610, having been discontinued and only a 20 year run, will continue to have a strong following and good value. Already the standard ~3500 price tag for a 10 year old example has risen by 500 bucks..........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 02:55 AM   #10
jessiethe3rd
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 316
Which ever you buy your budget easily trumps the watch cost.

If resell value is the only consideration you could gamble on a pristine LV and get a black bezzle insert. If I had to guess, this would be the watch to possible gain in value as it was a limited edition.
jessiethe3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 03:11 AM   #11
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by jskim View Post

Now the only factor I take in as a consideration is long term value.
- thats shouldnt be the only reason for anyone to pick a mass produced Rolex.

good luck on your quest though. all 3 are indeed wonderful pieces
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 03:15 AM   #12
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
In the long term, the likelihood is that they'll all pretty much retain a similar amount of value. In which case, I would simply pick the one I like the most, and no-one can tell you which one is best for you bar yourself
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2011, 04:52 AM   #13
LWRN
"TRF" Member
 
LWRN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Allover
Watch: PO/SubC
Posts: 160
As was stated, you can get all 3 here from some of the trusted sellers. Get some good wrist time with them all, and if you don't like one or more, flip it.
LWRN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.