ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cobblecanyon · 13 April 2011, 12:54 PM

Here are my 2 choices. Difference in price is about $1,200 for me.

New 2010 Sub 16610 "V"

or

New 2010 Sub 116610 Ceramic

I have been going back and forth on these 2 watches for the past 6 days.
Wish I could get the TT Sub Ceramic though....haha.

Any advice??? Which Sub will hold it's value more?

sleddog · 13 April 2011, 12:59 PM

Forget about value Tim....Buy the one that you will keep forever!

Danand · 13 April 2011, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cobblecanyon

Here are my 2 choices. Difference in price is about $1,200 for me.

New 2010 Sub 16610 "V"

or

New 2010 Sub 116610 Ceramic

I have been going back and forth on these 2 watches for the past 6 days.
Wish I could get the TT Sub Ceramic though....haha.

Any advice??? Which Sub will hold it's value more?

Flip a coin if you are only considering future value. Although if they are only $1200 apart I'd say go for the subc.

dsio · 13 April 2011, 01:01 PM

Holding its value I'd say the Sub-C being that its more modern in many ways and will be in demand well into the future. There are just far too many 16610s, and given how the 16800/168000's have dropped in value, even though they were made in vastly fewer numbers, I doubt the outlook will be better for a watch made for over 20 years.

toolr · 13 April 2011, 01:04 PM

I would go for the 16610.

chiko323 · 13 April 2011, 01:09 PM

I really like the new Sub C but the old one is more classic... Just try them both on and one of them will speak to you.

nauticajoe · 13 April 2011, 01:09 PM

Given your avatar, did you want another ceramic?

Go with the one that makes you smile. Good Luck!

ArthurU · 13 April 2011, 01:12 PM

My preference is the Sub Ceramic. However that is akin to my bias, as I've fallen in love with the SubC, subsequently due to recent trips to the AD and the lust for a Sub since I be-rid myself of the old DLC 16610. My advice to you is to pick the one you shall enjoy best.

cobblecanyon · 13 April 2011, 01:21 PM

Thanks for the comments...I am starting to lean more (55% vs 45%) toward the subC, for the simple fact that it's has the latest upgrades. Just feel more solid when I tried both of them on. I know I already have the GMT II c but that Sub C is STUNNING. I am just looking to add onto my Rolex collection. I have the Rolex bug now

I have to say...this forum have played a huge part in me getting the Rolex bug !! :)

My 3rd Rolex in 2yrs would be the Sub Green C

MortgageGuy · 13 April 2011, 01:40 PM

I too would go for the 16610, the ceramic still has ALOT of room to come down IMO... The sub 16610 is a classic and will not be available new in the near future.

At the end of the day though get the one you like the best

dsio · 13 April 2011, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MortgageGuy

I too would go for the 16610, the ceramic still has ALOT of room to come down IMO... The sub 16610 is a classic and will not be available new in the near future.

At the end of the day though get the one you like the best

The ceramic has a lot of room to go up as well (MSRP). Currently demand is high, supply is there not not massive, and MSRP is as low as its ever going to be. By the time demand drops for the ceramic and grey market prices begin to drop, the MSRP increases by Rolex will begin to offset that.

cobblecanyon · 13 April 2011, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MortgageGuy

I too would go for the 16610, the ceramic still has ALOT of room to come down IMO... The sub 16610 is a classic and will not be available new in the near future.

At the end of the day though get the one you like the best

Besides settling on a name for my daughter, this is the 2nd toughest decision I have to make in the last 7 yrs.

You do have a strong case...the 16610 is a classic and the "V" 2010 model is brand new and available. It's also $1200 less than the Sub C !! Who said time is not tough around here?

Jannal · 13 April 2011, 01:55 PM

Since the 16610 has been discontinued, it will appreciate in value more so compared with the current 116610.

Get the 16610.

painter76 · 13 April 2011, 05:27 PM

you got a GMT II Ceramic...I'll flip this one for a 16710 pepsi and buy the Sub Ceramic! the perfect pair!

stev · 13 April 2011, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painter76

you got a GMT II Ceramic...I'll flip this one for a 16710 pepsi and buy the Sub Ceramic! the perfect pair!

thats mine perfect pair too !!!

Darlinboy · 13 April 2011, 06:26 PM

I'd go for the SubC.

disclosure - long on SubC

closey · 13 April 2011, 06:47 PM

Future resale value/investment IMHO should never be an issue, enjoyment and appreciation is the key for me therefore... No ifs.. No buts.. 16610 without a shadow of doubt

esm · 13 April 2011, 06:52 PM

i'd go for the 16610LV - as there is a slight chance of 116610LV having a longer production run... but who knows.

i must say i like them both, but if i had to pick one, i'd probably go with the 16610LV

gqllc · 13 April 2011, 08:56 PM

How much do they want for the 16610LV??

le_baroudeur · 13 April 2011, 10:07 PM

16610lv all the time, the best of both worlds!

xjeeunitx · 13 April 2011, 10:30 PM

Dude, go the AD and try them on. You will see which one you will like. And that will be the ceramic. I can guarantee it. If you choose the older model..... well I don't know why you would hence the newer model has so many upgrades compared to the old.

karmatp · 13 April 2011, 11:40 PM

How is this even a question, the Sub C all the way. The new Subs are in a completely different class than the old, get the new for sure.

DCgator · 14 April 2011, 12:06 AM

I'd go for the 16610LV, then buy a black bezel insert. Hence, it's like having two different watches!

Happy hunting!

bscepter · 14 April 2011, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xjeeunitx

Dude, go the AD and try them on. You will see which one you will like. And that will be the ceramic. I can guarantee it

i tried both on... and i went with the 16610!

Dr. Robert · 14 April 2011, 12:41 AM

16610

Danand · 14 April 2011, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bscepter

i tried both on... and i went with the 16610!

And I tried both and went ceramic. Everyone's opinion is different. Make up your own mind.

13 April 2011, 12:54 PM	#1
cobblecanyon "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: JT Location: Texas Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN Posts: 453	2nd Rolex: 16610 "V" or 116610 Ceramic?? Here are my 2 choices. Difference in price is about $1,200 for me. New 2010 Sub 16610 "V" or New 2010 Sub 116610 Ceramic I have been going back and forth on these 2 watches for the past 6 days. Wish I could get the TT Sub Ceramic though....haha. Any advice??? Which Sub will hold it's value more?

13 April 2011, 12:59 PM	#2
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,930	Forget about value Tim....Buy the one that you will keep forever! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

13 April 2011, 01:01 PM	#4
dsio "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Ashley Location: Brisbane Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79 Posts: 2,301	Holding its value I'd say the Sub-C being that its more modern in many ways and will be in demand well into the future. There are just far too many 16610s, and given how the 16800/168000's have dropped in value, even though they were made in vastly fewer numbers, I doubt the outlook will be better for a watch made for over 20 years. __________________ -- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 -- -- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --

13 April 2011, 01:40 PM	#10
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	I too would go for the 16610, the ceramic still has ALOT of room to come down IMO... The sub 16610 is a classic and will not be available new in the near future. At the end of the day though get the one you like the best __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

13 April 2011, 01:55 PM	#13
Jannal "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 685	Since the 16610 has been discontinued, it will appreciate in value more so compared with the current 116610. Get the 16610. __________________ Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000-1JF / DW-5040 40th / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 / SNE543P1

13 April 2011, 01:04 PM	#5
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,367	I would go for the 16610.

13 April 2011, 01:09 PM	#6
chiko323 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: MA Watch: AP & Rolex Posts: 953	I really like the new Sub C but the old one is more classic... Just try them both on and one of them will speak to you.

13 April 2011, 01:09 PM	#7
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Given your avatar, did you want another ceramic? Go with the one that makes you smile. Good Luck!

13 April 2011, 01:12 PM	#8
ArthurU Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Arthur Location: Toronto Watch: 116610 Posts: 173	My preference is the Sub Ceramic. However that is akin to my bias, as I've fallen in love with the SubC, subsequently due to recent trips to the AD and the lust for a Sub since I be-rid myself of the old DLC 16610. My advice to you is to pick the one you shall enjoy best.

13 April 2011, 01:21 PM	#9
cobblecanyon "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: JT Location: Texas Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN Posts: 453	Thanks for the comments...I am starting to lean more (55% vs 45%) toward the subC, for the simple fact that it's has the latest upgrades. Just feel more solid when I tried both of them on. I know I already have the GMT II c but that Sub C is STUNNING. I am just looking to add onto my Rolex collection. I have the Rolex bug now I have to say...this forum have played a huge part in me getting the Rolex bug !! :) My 3rd Rolex in 2yrs would be the Sub Green C

13 April 2011, 05:27 PM	#14
painter76 Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Piacenza - Italy Watch: sub 16610 k series Posts: 51	you got a GMT II Ceramic...I'll flip this one for a 16710 pepsi and buy the Sub Ceramic! the perfect pair!

13 April 2011, 06:26 PM	#16
Darlinboy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: DB Location: :noitacoL Watch: :hctaW Posts: 6,701	I'd go for the SubC. disclosure - long on SubC

13 April 2011, 06:47 PM	#17
closey "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Closey Location: England Posts: 184	Future resale value/investment IMHO should never be an issue, enjoyment and appreciation is the key for me therefore... No ifs.. No buts.. 16610 without a shadow of doubt

13 April 2011, 06:52 PM	#18
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	i'd go for the 16610LV - as there is a slight chance of 116610LV having a longer production run... but who knows. i must say i like them both, but if i had to pick one, i'd probably go with the 16610LV

13 April 2011, 08:56 PM	#19
gqllc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Albany NY Watch: Blue Bezel SubC Posts: 1,511	How much do they want for the 16610LV?? __________________ K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC

13 April 2011, 10:07 PM	#20
le_baroudeur "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Rennes, FRANCE Posts: 802	16610lv all the time, the best of both worlds! __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons.

13 April 2011, 10:30 PM	#21
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,477	Dude, go the AD and try them on. You will see which one you will like. And that will be the ceramic. I can guarantee it. If you choose the older model..... well I don't know why you would hence the newer model has so many upgrades compared to the old.

13 April 2011, 11:40 PM	#22
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	How is this even a question, the Sub C all the way. The new Subs are in a completely different class than the old, get the new for sure. __________________ My grails:

14 April 2011, 12:06 AM	#23
DCgator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: PNW Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2 Posts: 8,123	I'd go for the 16610LV, then buy a black bezel insert. Hence, it's like having two different watches! Happy hunting!

14 April 2011, 12:41 AM	#25
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,049	16610 __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)