ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

2wheelseadweller · 21 August 2007, 05:48 AM

About $200 more for the sub. But it is new in the box and the SD has no box and it is an 05' in good shape except for the oring dang it.

colemanitis · 21 August 2007, 05:54 AM

I'd get the Sub. Don't get a SD that's missing an o-ring... what else is missing that you can't see?

Tools · 21 August 2007, 05:57 AM

I would always take a Sub over an SD..

OK, OK......Maybe after I have enough Subs I'll let an SD slip in...

Hell, I'd even get a TT Blue before I got an SD..... (but I still wouldn't wear it)

BiG JeEzY · 21 August 2007, 06:01 AM

I agree, I would go with the Sub Date as well. For me in terms of functionality, I do not really need the extra 3000 feet of water resistancy. 1000 feet is more than Ill ever need. A lot of people have chosen the Sea Dweller though because they do not favor the cyclops on the crystal.

Robb · 21 August 2007, 06:04 AM

Sub!

SWFLA1 · 21 August 2007, 06:05 AM

Sub for me, also

Bama · 21 August 2007, 07:44 AM

I like the SD, but I'd go for the Sub

jjs · 21 August 2007, 08:03 AM

No box?, No o-ring? Sub for sure.

USMCsilver · 21 August 2007, 08:05 AM

Give me a date -- give me a cyclops -- give me the Sub!

Downing · 21 August 2007, 08:05 AM

Which sub are you talking about, the No Date?

If that's the case, I'd rather have a Sea-Dweller but not that Sea-Dweller.

Take it back. Get the Sub.

Assuming of course, it's authentic. I have some serious doubts about your seller.

colemanitis · 21 August 2007, 08:07 AM

So far it's unanimous!

Stef_Call · 21 August 2007, 08:16 AM

Only one choice my friend !! SUB SUB SUB !!!! Best of luck.

mike · 21 August 2007, 08:17 AM

No oring?

Gimmie the Sub!!

Rubenonfire · 21 August 2007, 10:52 AM

Sub all the way! It's newer, and it's complete. OH, and it also happens to be the quintessencial Rolex model!

Alcan · 21 August 2007, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2wheelseadweller

in good shape except for the oring dang it.

What's the issue with the o-ring? Every reply so far has assumed it's missing.

Rubenonfire · 21 August 2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alcan

What's the issue with the o-ring? Every reply so far has assumed it's missing.

Al-
It is. He pointed that out in another thread. What say you, now?

Alcan · 21 August 2007, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rubenonfire

Al-
It is. He pointed that out in another thread. What say you, now?

Obviously, I missed that thread.

ron17402 · 21 August 2007, 11:09 AM

The SD fits much differently on the wrist. Before you make a decision, make sure you are happy with the way it fits and looks on your wrist.

I like the weight of the SD, but the sub is a good balance of weight, height, and drape. The SD is very top heavy and sits high on the wrist.

Just my $.02.

Rawhyde · 21 August 2007, 11:33 AM

You need to take a deep breath, relax, and do NOTHING!

Go visit some other AD's and determine whether you really want a Sub or a SD. That is a decision you need to make regardless of price, any particular deal, or any other factor except how the watch feels and looks on your wrist. Make sure to leave your money safely at home while you're doing your comparisons.

Once you make the decision, THEN pursue the watch you choose. Just leave that SD that's missing an O-Ring out of the equation altogether. God only knows what other issues it may have, and since Rolexes last damn near forever you should start your relationship off on the right foot.

Rawhyde

SSD · 21 August 2007, 11:36 AM

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuub!!!!!!!!!!!!

JMO.

WWOODDYY74 · 21 August 2007, 11:41 AM

Sub for me also!

Blue Bull · 21 August 2007, 12:08 PM

A Sub/Date or SD,BNIB from AD.If pre owned,be VERY sure its from a reputable seller and its complete(box and papers)

The Sub is common,in numbers,the SD is different.The SD is more unique.

Anyone is a good choice,so is the Expl II,new and old GMT.

Any ss sport Rolex is a good buy.

xf384c · 21 August 2007, 03:37 PM

I would pay more just for the SD.
Yet in your case, I would pay more for the BNIB Sub.
If you are paying that much to begin with, just get a new one.

JJ Irani · 21 August 2007, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2wheelseadweller

About $200 more for the sub. But it is new in the box and the SD has no box and it is an 05' in good shape except for the oring dang it.

That's a no-brainer, my friend.

An SD without the O-ring is almost likely to be a bloody fake!!

I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole.

Just make sure the Sub is REAL and then go for it - eyes wide shut!!

Andad · 21 August 2007, 05:36 PM

I'd go for the Sub unless you're going to 4000ft.

SPACE-DWELLER · 21 August 2007, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colemanitis

I'd get the Sub. Don't get a SD that's missing an o-ring... what else is missing that you can't see?

The cyclops?

SPACE-DWELLER · 21 August 2007, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colemanitis

So far it's unanimous!

NO, it isn't!

Because I will go different and suggest the SUB!

21 August 2007, 05:48 AM	#1
2wheelseadweller Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Corpus Christi Posts: 78	Would you rather have new Sub or and 05' SD? Almost same money About $200 more for the sub. But it is new in the box and the SD has no box and it is an 05' in good shape except for the oring dang it.

21 August 2007, 05:54 AM	#2
colemanitis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Florida Watch: PAM 1090 Posts: 3,723	I'd get the Sub. Don't get a SD that's missing an o-ring... what else is missing that you can't see? __________________ Member #471

21 August 2007, 06:01 AM	#4
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	I agree, I would go with the Sub Date as well. For me in terms of functionality, I do not really need the extra 3000 feet of water resistancy. 1000 feet is more than Ill ever need. A lot of people have chosen the Sea Dweller though because they do not favor the cyclops on the crystal. __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

21 August 2007, 06:04 AM	#5
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	Sub! __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

21 August 2007, 08:05 AM	#9
USMCsilver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Sterling Location: Middle of SC Watch: Anniv. GMT II Posts: 908	Give me a date -- give me a cyclops -- give me the Sub! __________________ The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~

21 August 2007, 05:57 AM	#3
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,500	I would always take a Sub over an SD.. OK, OK......Maybe after I have enough Subs I'll let an SD slip in... Hell, I'd even get a TT Blue before I got an SD..... (but I still wouldn't wear it)

21 August 2007, 06:05 AM	#6
SWFLA1 Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: USA Posts: 226	Sub for me, also

21 August 2007, 07:44 AM	#7
Bama "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington, DC Posts: 1,150	I like the SD, but I'd go for the Sub

21 August 2007, 08:03 AM	#8
jjs Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 75	No box?, No o-ring? Sub for sure.

21 August 2007, 08:05 AM	#10
Downing "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Downing Location: Portland, Oregon Watch: SD ExpII GO Nav ND Posts: 1,640	Which sub are you talking about, the No Date? If that's the case, I'd rather have a Sea-Dweller but not that Sea-Dweller. Take it back. Get the Sub. Assuming of course, it's authentic. I have some serious doubts about your seller. __________________ One if by land, one if by sea, one if by air and one uh, just to tell time. Rolex Explorer II White Rolex Sea-Dweller Glashütte Original Navigator Panerai 183 G Black Seal

21 August 2007, 08:07 AM	#11
colemanitis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Florida Watch: PAM 1090 Posts: 3,723	So far it's unanimous! __________________ Member #471

21 August 2007, 08:16 AM	#12
Stef_Call Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Stefan Location: Dublin, Ireland Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc Posts: 470	Only one choice my friend !! SUB SUB SUB !!!! Best of luck.

21 August 2007, 08:17 AM	#13
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	No oring? Gimmie the Sub!!

21 August 2007, 10:52 AM	#14
Rubenonfire "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Ruben Location: Orange County Watch: 16610LV Posts: 1,317	Sub all the way! It's newer, and it's complete. OH, and it also happens to be the quintessencial Rolex model! __________________ Throw your Rollies in the sky, wave 'em side to side, now keep your hands high.

21 August 2007, 11:09 AM	#18
ron17402 Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Ron Location: Charlotte, NC USA Watch: 116710 Posts: 435	The SD fits much differently on the wrist. Before you make a decision, make sure you are happy with the way it fits and looks on your wrist. I like the weight of the SD, but the sub is a good balance of weight, height, and drape. The SD is very top heavy and sits high on the wrist. Just my $.02.

21 August 2007, 11:33 AM	#19
Rawhyde Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Craig Location: NW Georgia Watch: Blue Sub+Tud Chron Posts: 834	You need to take a deep breath, relax, and do NOTHING! Go visit some other AD's and determine whether you really want a Sub or a SD. That is a decision you need to make regardless of price, any particular deal, or any other factor except how the watch feels and looks on your wrist. Make sure to leave your money safely at home while you're doing your comparisons. Once you make the decision, THEN pursue the watch you choose. Just leave that SD that's missing an O-Ring out of the equation altogether. God only knows what other issues it may have, and since Rolexes last damn near forever you should start your relationship off on the right foot. Rawhyde

21 August 2007, 11:36 AM	#20
SSD "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jamie Location: Georgia Watch: Stainless Sub Date Posts: 3,023	Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuub!!!!!!!!!!!! JMO. __________________ SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464

21 August 2007, 11:41 AM	#21
WWOODDYY74 Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Mitchell Location: Okinawa Japan Watch: Explorer II Posts: 166	Sub for me also!

21 August 2007, 12:08 PM	#22
Blue Bull Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,887	A Sub/Date or SD,BNIB from AD.If pre owned,be VERY sure its from a reputable seller and its complete(box and papers) The Sub is common,in numbers,the SD is different.The SD is more unique. Anyone is a good choice,so is the Expl II,new and old GMT. Any ss sport Rolex is a good buy.

21 August 2007, 03:37 PM	#23
xf384c "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Beverly Hills, CA Watch: Sea Dweller 16600 Posts: 155	I would pay more just for the SD. Yet in your case, I would pay more for the BNIB Sub. If you are paying that much to begin with, just get a new one.

21 August 2007, 05:36 PM	#25
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,505	I'd go for the Sub unless you're going to 4000ft. __________________ E

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)