ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

FX44 · 14 April 2012, 03:09 AM

Not for me but thanks for sharing

TakesALickin · 14 April 2012, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sierra11b

mcww does a much better job of cerakote on watches and for $150 if it really tickles your fancy. You'll notice most of mcww's gallery are just the watch head (on nato) and probably for that reason.

x2!

witch watch · 14 April 2012, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trandy

The Sub doesn't look bad....the rest? Meh.

I personally think the DSSD looks best, the rest look rubber almost.

Fredrik · 14 April 2012, 05:21 AM

So, basically someone heard a rumor about black rolexes from the 60's that no one else ever heard of or seen and decides to try to make a buck by cerakoting a bunch of vintage models and selling with a huge premium?

tattooedfagin · 14 April 2012, 05:41 AM

not for me either, be too conscious of wearing it, a few dings etc & it'll look awful

14 April 2012, 03:09 AM	#31
FX44 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: John Location: Charlotte, NC Watch: Submariner 114060 Posts: 518	Not for me but thanks for sharing __________________ Submariner 114060

14 April 2012, 05:41 AM	#35
tattooedfagin "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Chad Location: the neighbourhood Watch: 1680 Red Posts: 2,262	not for me either, be too conscious of wearing it, a few dings etc & it'll look awful __________________ SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame

14 April 2012, 05:21 AM	#34
Fredrik 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Sweden Watch: 1680 Posts: 1,874	So, basically someone heard a rumor about black rolexes from the 60's that no one else ever heard of or seen and decides to try to make a buck by cerakoting a bunch of vintage models and selling with a huge premium?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)