The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 October 2012, 07:26 AM   #1
Pghwatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 88
Skyfall, Bond

I sure wish Bond was wearing the Sky Dweller in the new Bond film.

Nothing against Omega but Bond should always wear a Rolex IMO.
Pghwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:34 AM   #2
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
If Rolex won't pay, they won't get the gig

And, for the record, Bond as a character doesn't tend to wear flashy watches - never has done in the novels, that's for sure. In the most recent novel, he was wearing a 34mm OP Date - purely functional, much like the Planet Ocean, in that respect
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:35 AM   #3
Israguard
"TRF" Member
 
Israguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Montreal
Posts: 859
It's all about the $$$$$.
Israguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:36 AM   #4
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
+ 1 , plus the fact that after Felix Baumgartner's Jump, how can one claim a "Sky Fall" and be taken seriously ?????
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:38 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:40 AM   #6
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Bond is a fictitious character and doesn't exist in real life. In his world run by Eon productions, he'll wear, drink or drive whatever someone is willing to pay.

I'd rather know and see pics of what my TRF colleagues are wearing and enjoying with their families and friends.

Fleming didn't even rate Rolex. He only made Bond wear a Rolex because it could be used as a knuckle duster!
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:41 AM   #7
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"
:r ofl:

I'm with you!! Bond is boring!!!!
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:45 AM   #8
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
They'd know he was a spy instantly. Only a state-sponsored spy agency like MI6 could afford one in the first place.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:46 AM   #9
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"
Nope your not alone. Nothing wrong with Bond but his movies don't do anything for me and I don't read so the books have no value to me as well.
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:10 AM   #10
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
In Bond movies more non Rolexes than Rolexes have been worn.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:35 AM   #11
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Rolex don't seem interested in fictional characters. It lowers the class of the brand IMHO and I'd really hate to see Rolex choose to actually pay to have this association.

Omega can flog more planet oceans this way no doubt. Much like the 007 editions they release. It works for them as there are clearly those who will pay big $$$ to have the bond watch.

But I find the whole marketing stance cheapens the brand, who seem to be attempting to develop their stance among the higher tier watch companies.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:38 AM   #12
Roller07
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
You have to pay.....to play
Roller07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:39 AM   #13
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"

No, count me in on the club
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:46 AM   #14
Muaitai
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex 16610 LN
Posts: 25
I don't think Rolex needs that kind of marketing, Rolex is well know worldwide and stands to a higher standard, its basically a life style brand IMHO.
Muaitai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 08:56 AM   #15
swiss ghost
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pghwatch View Post
I sure wish Bond was wearing the Sky Dweller in the new Bond film.

Nothing against Omega but Bond should always wear a Rolex IMO.
sky dweller on a secret agent?

maybe on elton john

bottomline. like it or not. BOND works for OMEGA #'s wise. does this 'cheapen' the brand? no moreso than TIGER sporting a Rolex Deepsea. Bond? fictional? this is nothing new. see DOXA.

swiss ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 10:12 AM   #16
ronbo710
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Ron
Location: US
Watch: 118206/SD
Posts: 431
Maybe now he goes by Baumgartner, Felix Baumgartner :D
ronbo710 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 10:16 AM   #17
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"
Not the only one.

While I do like the movies, I don't care what kind of watch he is wearing.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 11:37 AM   #18
slim4511
"TRF" Member
 
slim4511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 484
I love the Bond movies, always have. That said, I don't care one bit if he is wearing a Rolex or not as I am still going to be a fan of both. On the other side, I would love for Rolex to have absolutely nothing to do with Tiger Woods.
__________________
GMT IIc, Exp II, Speedy Pro

If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
slim4511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 11:39 AM   #19
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
60 minutes had a good interview with barb broccoli and eon productions execs and it was said they don't take a dime for recent craig 007 placements, but rather the product placement license holder has to market the movie with their product in every country the movie is screened. how this $ amount is factored in is not known to the public but i assume the marketing dollars are better than the $500k - $5M they would be able to command as a traditional placement deal. advertising ain't cheap.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 11:40 AM   #20
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I like the movies also. I could care less about what watch he is wearing.
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 11:47 AM   #21
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
i grew up on bond movies, my father loved them and so do i, much of the advanced technology they use to show is now reality, not all of course, the cold war helped. I don't care if he wears a rolex, but it certainly helped the sub in the old days, most men wanted to be bond, hot girls, money, exciting locations.
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 12:25 PM   #22
gregvisser
"TRF" Member
 
gregvisser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Greg Visser
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pghwatch View Post
Nothing against Omega but Bond should always wear a Rolex IMO.
I wear Rolex - if that helps?

Rolex is just too expensive for the British government at the moment with the turndown in the economy etc. I'm sure it will bounce back and the might be able to issue him with a Rolex for the next mission.

Greg
gregvisser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 12:42 PM   #23
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Man.

I must be the only Rolex owner who could not give a Monkey's Bum about "Bond"
I haven't seen the last 3 Bond films. Maybe 4.
How many has Daniel Craig done now? Last one I saw was that other guy!
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:21 PM   #24
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
Who?

Sean Connery?
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:33 PM   #25
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
Omega and Heineken!!!

It's all product placement and marketing.

I can't believe Bond will be ordering a Heineken instead of a Vesper martini!

Look, it's about money. How to get back on the initial investment. ROI.
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:40 PM   #26
manuu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: M
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex CHNR
Posts: 186
I don't see how bond wearing omega cheapens the brand. Even if it does, I'd think a lying cheating golfer's association with Rolex cheapens that brand even more so.
manuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:47 PM   #27
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by versatile1 View Post
I haven't seen the last 3 Bond films. Maybe 4.
How many has Daniel Craig done now? Last one I saw was that other guy!
There was only one Bond and that was SC.

DC doesn't fit the bill IMO. A sawn off 007?

Rolex used to be worn in the first Bond movies with SC. I think Rolex matured a bit since then.
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:48 PM   #28
Cronus4
"TRF" Member
 
Cronus4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1 more
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalip View Post
Rolex don't seem interested in fictional characters. It lowers the class of the brand IMHO and I'd really hate to see Rolex choose to actually pay to have this association.

Omega can flog more planet oceans this way no doubt. Much like the 007 editions they release. It works for them as there are clearly those who will pay big $$$ to have the bond watch.

But I find the whole marketing stance cheapens the brand, who seem to be attempting to develop their stance among the higher tier watch companies.
I agree with the cheapening comment. Although almost the entire cast of the Expendables was wearing Panerai's and I don't feel like that cheapened their brand...though I suppose that could be debated.
Cronus4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 02:30 PM   #29
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pghwatch View Post
I sure wish Bond was wearing the Sky Dweller in the new Bond film.

Nothing against Omega but Bond should always wear a Rolex IMO.
that make two of us
__________________
14060M SM300 PAM000 Poljot-BAIKAL G Shock
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 03:24 PM   #30
Robbie68
"TRF" Member
 
Robbie68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NH
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 492
Let's be honest here, Bond may be a fictional character but he is influential, anybody not know who he is? Sure it's about money but we are talking about one of if not the most well known fictional character ever. It's good to dream a little. People buy Bond, a bit of escapism is a good thing in my opinion.
Robbie68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.