ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 February 2013, 09:56 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,459
|
Usually 3 sides to every story Each person telling their side and then there's the TRUTH!
|
16 February 2013, 05:16 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
:-)
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
17 February 2013, 01:58 AM | #63 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
|
|
20 February 2013, 04:43 AM | #64 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
|
a fogged up watch is and will never be a $20 fix. not if you want it done right anyway. you know what, I got tired reading this without resolution. Send the watch to me and Ill have it serviced the right way. just pay for return shipping and any parts that it might require. if you need reference, I am sure you can find a few here on TRF about me:)
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE! Watches: Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi Wish list: Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130 |
20 February 2013, 05:33 AM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: George
Location: New York
Watch: Speedmaster, Rolex
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2013, 08:49 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,714
|
Hey guys.. Im sorry i took so long to answer, but this is the first time that i am reading this thread in its entirety. Ill just start by saying, that i have had the pleasure of speaking with Chozn1 this past friday, and he is a true gentleman. The fact of the matter is, that i had only received (read) one email from Chozn1 sometime in late September.. The others he sent i simply did not receive (spam), or just didnt read. Anything is possible. And i realize that is not his fault, its mine. I explained my issues of being overloaded with emails and that i actually had my computer savvy friend try to reduce the amount of commercial emails that i have been receiving, using some keywords technique..(above my grasp of computer knowledge). I have had this same friend undo whatever it is he had done previously, and will devote more time to going through emails. At the end of the day, im more of a call me direct type of guy, its quicker and easier in person type of guy, but as you can see, that isnt always the best way. Just to be clear though, and im not blaming Chozn1 for this, but i did not receive any phone calls whatsoever from him regarding this issue from its outset. I just want to make that clear because someone had posted that they couldnt believe that i didnt pick up the phone.. Again, phone contact was never attempted. Now i would like to illustrate a point here.. As clearly as i can. I have my own watchmaker that handles all of my repairs.. Because of the tight business relationship i have with him, my repairs end up costing me a fraction of what other people would have to pay for the same repair. It is for these reasons that it does not make any sense for me to ever shun a customer away in light of repairs. Never and i mean never, have i ever refused a customer a repair that was under warranty. My reputation in the watch community is sterling. So as i said earlier, i have had the pleasure of speaking with Chozn1 this past Friday, and he is a total gentleman.. He understood where i was coming from, and i certainly more than understand why anyone would be furious if they thought they were being neglected by a seller. I know i would. So there was no issue whatsoever beween us, and the last we left off, he was going to ship the watch to me to have my watchmaker service the watch, and make it better than ever.. Anyway, thanks for listening. My sincere apologies to Chozn1 and to the RF community.. We rely on trust. Without trust, we cant efficiently move big ticket items the way we do. Cheer's.. Dan..
|
21 February 2013, 04:39 PM | #67 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Watch: The Throne
Posts: 375
|
No way I would simply have it repaired by him months after sale, especially with the excuses and poor communication. Refund only at this point. He did know there was an issue with the watch seals once you received it, as you emailed him and he gave you the number to call him at. A reputable seller would follow up with you after that fact as he knew something was going on, even if he did not get a call or further emails from you. There was no attempt for follow up. The "spam/junk" missing emails obviously sounds fishy, as the Gmail Spam filter does not filter out previously addresses with prior correspondence. He clearly was aware there was issue for which he was responsible for following up on. Amazing how the hurricane was such a major road block for him yet, "why didn't you call?". Waiting by his phone during a time of supposed desperation and disaster, yet no computer access for on-record communication?
If you get the watch back after his repair you still have to pay for someone to look at it like you said. Even if he offers to pay you for someone to look at it you will still always have it in the back of your mind every time you wear the watch. Its an "issue" watch now. Its was moist for months in your possession, and that was not part of the agreement. Makes me wonder why he was able to offer the initial price at such a deep discount. Perhaps he knew something that the ad didn't state? That is my take on this. Hope it all works out for you. |
21 February 2013, 06:03 PM | #68 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,480
|
Having read through your situation and in light of the delays in attending to a possible ingress of moisture I would simply send the watch to a RSC and ask for a quotation to fix any issues.
You will then know the exact condition of the movement and the work required. The one year warranty can then be negotiated. It is easy to be smart in hindsight but how about phone calls next time with a follow up confirmation email of the conversation and agreed outcomes?
__________________
E |
21 February 2013, 07:05 PM | #69 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
The seller Daneebee said that he even "called you several times with no reply on your end".
Is this true Chozn1? Did you receive any calls from Daneebee and not answer due to the fact that you wanted to keep things in writing? or did he never call you at all. I know if it was me, even if I wanted to keep things in writing I would have answered his calls, the fact he had disappeared. It would be very easy to show us records of all of these calls being made. There's just a lot of things don't quite add up here for me in this whole thing. Firstly it was the hurricane that caused the issues of not receiving the emails, then it was an IT friend putting some kind of security on the email account. Can you even add your own increased filter security to a gmail account? I'm not being smart here but I would generally be interested to know this. |
22 February 2013, 01:05 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,501
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Models... (K)Bluesy (M) TT DJ In search of DayDate Prior models... Just about everything. |
|
23 February 2013, 08:37 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1
|
First time poster, (relatively) long time reader here.
From the outside looking in, and based solely on the information contained within this thread, I'm inclined to side with the buyer on this matter. I feel the manner in which Chozn1 conducted himself to be professional, and the anonymity he initially afforded Daneebee more than generous. He was given no option but to air out his grievance in a public forum. At face value it appears that only the self-preservation of the sellers online reputation is what prompted a response; a red flag in my books. As someone here has already mentioned, "the customer is always right". Chozn1's preferred method of correspondence is via email, which I believe is smart. I would be vary cautious of doing business with anyone who cant at least keep up with that expectation. |
23 February 2013, 08:30 PM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex 116610 LV
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
|
|
24 February 2013, 01:57 AM | #73 | ||
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,858
|
Quote:
Previously I've looked at a lot of your "for sale" listing, asked questions and considered a purchase. Due to the red flags in this thread alone I've stopped looking at them. If I'm the buyer at this point I would want one of 2 things to happen. 1.) Return for full refund. No questions! No Hassels! 2.) Qualified independant 3rd party examines the watch, determines required repairs & performs them at sellers expense. Any other suggested course of action would be more of the same bad customer service. No disrespect to your watchmaker but no better 3rd party than an RSC. It will cost you more but what's the value of your future reputation? Quote:
|
||
25 February 2013, 05:19 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,459
|
I also side with the buyer here. The seller is posting items for sale, involved in an internet based business of high priced items, in a trusted online forum, but doesn't check his emails? Something just doesn't smell right. Very interested to see the outcome of this matter.
|
27 February 2013, 11:12 AM | #75 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,858
|
Has anyone seen an update from the OP? Would like to know what happened.
|
2 March 2013, 03:36 AM | #76 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,501
|
Quote:
I owe you all an update. I'm glad Dan got on here and aired his side, and I appreciate everyone's candor in response. I've just PM'd him and given him the weekend to let me know if he's going to issue a refund or not. I was going to parapharase, but it would probably be best if I just cut and paste... Quote:
__________________
Current Models... (K)Bluesy (M) TT DJ In search of DayDate Prior models... Just about everything. |
||
2 March 2013, 06:16 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,714
|
Hi Chozn1.. No worries.. I was wondering where you were, and waiting to hear from you. Like i told you the last time we spoke on the phone, you are welcome to either send the watch back for a refund, or repair. Your choice.. So go ahead and send it back for a full refund.. You have my address.. Thanks, Dan....
|
2 March 2013, 11:36 PM | #78 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
"Dan, I was out of town for 8 days after we spoke and couldn't get the watch sent off before leaving unfortunately. I've had time to come back and think about the matter and see other's input, and this is not something that you're going to want to hear, but I simply do not feel good about sending the watch back for repair. Something you said on the phone nags at me every time I think about it, and I hate to hold something against you that was said off the cuff, but when you said your watchmaker would go in and "rebuild the movement"... that's not what I want nor needed to hear. You caught yourself and perhaps you mis-spoke, but if I send it back for repair I'll always be wondering what might be going on with it and it will take the joy out of the watch. As I've said before, I'd have to invest more time in resources in getting it evaluated by a third party after its return. I'm a big boy and can make my own decisions, but my worries have only been validated by the Rolex Forum Community members. If the majority of them had told me I was out of line with my request for a refund, I'd reconsider. But that's not been the case. Give it a day or two and let me know where you are on this. You said the watch has gone up in value, so I think it would be best if you take it back, repair it, and let it have a fresh start with someone else." There it is. That's how I would feel about it. That's why I sold the rootbeer GMT I had, bad juju. |
2 March 2013, 11:38 PM | #79 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Dan, I respect that you are going to accept the return for a full refund. I believe in the end, Chozn1 should not lose a single dime, including the cost of shipping.
|
3 March 2013, 01:59 AM | #80 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,858
|
Quote:
X2 ..... |
|
21 March 2013, 02:41 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,501
|
Have the boards been hacked again? This is about my 5th attempt at login.
Anyway, refund received and he intended to include the shipping price, but whoever wrote the check while he was out of town did their math wrong. I honestly don't care about that though. He included a nice note and I'm not one to whine about a pithy amount in the scheme of things. The fact he oversaw it while out of town rather than waiting to get back meant more. All is well.
__________________
Current Models... (K)Bluesy (M) TT DJ In search of DayDate Prior models... Just about everything. |
22 March 2013, 09:21 AM | #82 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,858
|
Quote:
Good on you Dan for dealing with this issue. |
|
27 August 2013, 09:26 PM | #83 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 31
|
I know this issue has been resolved but I'd just like to say how amazingly refreshing it was.
Both parties had their say in a responsible manner, no names were thrown, no-one got banned at the end of it and ultimately rationality prevailed. I'd also like to point out to daneebee that although the tide of opinion was against you, much to your credit, you realised this and changed your approach accordingly. I'm a noob on the TRF but your actions in this thread show that you are someone who cares about your reputation. You may feel this thread persists forever as a blot on your name but I'd like you to know that after reading my way through this I wouldn't have any issues dealing with you. Lovely to see things resolved in a civilized manner. Very rare on the internet, especially with money involved. Well done all. |
27 August 2013, 09:45 PM | #84 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
daneebee |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.