ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Neunundneunzig · 10 July 2013, 06:59 AM

I'm currently torn between the classic Sea Dweller or GMT Master. I had a 14060M which I rather liked, but I ultimately couldn't go without a date. I like the classic look of the SD and I have always wanted one, but I'm concerned that it might be too big to wear often. While the GMT is more versatile as the bezels can be changed out and it's thinner, I still find myself going back to the SD.

What would you recommend?

jbshaffer · 10 July 2013, 07:02 AM

EZ....Sea Dweller :D

KBM · 10 July 2013, 07:07 AM

The SD is virtually the same size as your old Sub. I believe it is only a tad thicker. It would not seem much bigger. I say go with the SD!!

Bangel · 10 July 2013, 07:31 AM

Sounds like you have an itch that needs scratching. Get the SD.

luvsub · 10 July 2013, 07:35 AM

Sd

landroverking · 10 July 2013, 07:35 AM

Sd.

Sam Philip · 10 July 2013, 09:02 AM

Sd

p_surabhi · 10 July 2013, 11:54 AM

No contest, SD!

cop414 · 10 July 2013, 11:56 AM

The SD would look a lot like your old 14060... but with a date and no cyclops!

Hairdude1 · 10 July 2013, 12:04 PM

SD all the way

Betelc · 10 July 2013, 12:10 PM

SD; even though I don't have one, yet.

jbsmith · 10 July 2013, 12:21 PM

GMTIIc gets my vote.

joe100 · 10 July 2013, 12:29 PM

GMT. No questions or substitutes

Doug T · 10 July 2013, 12:40 PM

My vote goes to GMT II.

Thebiglagu · 10 July 2013, 12:49 PM

Seadweller!!!!!!!!!!

Chainring · 10 July 2013, 12:53 PM

GMT II (cause that's what I have) but I want a SD, too. Tough choice.

Billywiz · 10 July 2013, 12:55 PM

Gmt 2

porschedude · 10 July 2013, 01:08 PM

SD for sure

Armyguy03 · 10 July 2013, 01:09 PM

If you like the look of the Sub sans cyclops, the SD is your winner. It can be worn daily from suit to sweats and tee on a NATO and vice versa. I seriously cannot recommend a better watch. It's like everything perfect about the 14060 and made MORE perfect with the added weight, deeper dive capabilities, and date. PLEASE go try one on and I think you'll agree. I have the "Sub Trifecta" (not my words) and the SD is the cherry on top. I will be honest and say that of I started with the SD I would've ended my Rolex fascination right then and there. Okay, maybe not BUT it's still a heck of a piece.

psv · 10 July 2013, 01:23 PM

The Sea-Dweller has a cult following online, especially here on TRF. I say just listen to your inner voice and make the decision but do try them on as well. As much as I adore the pedigree and the design of the SD16600 it was never as comfortable on my wrist as my 16610, or any of my other Rolex watches for that matter.

Find a way to try them both on, then make up your mind.

Atomant · 10 July 2013, 02:01 PM

Get them both if you can. I'd pick the SD if I really have to.

George Ab · 10 July 2013, 02:31 PM

Sounds like you love divers. Then go with the SD. It is plenty comfortable. That said it is really a tough call. The GMT II is just the perfect watch. I am fortunate to own them both as my only Rolexes.

DJWong · 10 July 2013, 04:30 PM

SD, but I'm biased. GMT one day for sure :-)

h999r · 11 July 2013, 03:47 AM

Sd

sea-dweller · 11 July 2013, 04:12 AM

Get them both! The SD is bulky, in my opinion.

nauticajoe · 11 July 2013, 05:06 AM

Easy....SD.

elev8w · 11 July 2013, 05:07 AM

SD is not that bulky at all(as opposed to DSSD). I find it extremely close in profile to 16610s

stevedssd · 11 July 2013, 05:56 AM

GMT for me.................................but I think the SD is calling you!

mjclark32 · 11 July 2013, 06:32 AM

Sd ftw

laphroaig007 · 11 July 2013, 06:46 AM

GMT because it will sit better on your wrist.

10 July 2013, 06:59 AM	#1
Neunundneunzig Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Ohio Posts: 159	SD or GMT? I'm currently torn between the classic Sea Dweller or GMT Master. I had a 14060M which I rather liked, but I ultimately couldn't go without a date. I like the classic look of the SD and I have always wanted one, but I'm concerned that it might be too big to wear often. While the GMT is more versatile as the bezels can be changed out and it's thinner, I still find myself going back to the SD. What would you recommend?

10 July 2013, 11:56 AM	#9
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,158	The SD would look a lot like your old 14060... but with a date and no cyclops! __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

10 July 2013, 12:29 PM	#13
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,838	GMT. No questions or substitutes __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

10 July 2013, 01:09 PM	#19
Armyguy03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: DM[V] Watch: 16710 \| 16600 Posts: 3,546	If you like the look of the Sub sans cyclops, the SD is your winner. It can be worn daily from suit to sweats and tee on a NATO and vice versa. I seriously cannot recommend a better watch. It's like everything perfect about the 14060 and made MORE perfect with the added weight, deeper dive capabilities, and date. PLEASE go try one on and I think you'll agree. I have the "Sub Trifecta" (not my words) and the SD is the cherry on top. I will be honest and say that of I started with the SD I would've ended my Rolex fascination right then and there. Okay, maybe not BUT it's still a heck of a piece. __________________ Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

10 July 2013, 02:01 PM	#21
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	Get them both if you can. I'd pick the SD if I really have to. __________________ 116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80

10 July 2013, 07:02 AM	#2
jbshaffer "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Utah Watch: SDK&F Posts: 344	EZ....Sea Dweller :D

10 July 2013, 07:07 AM	#3
KBM 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,451	The SD is virtually the same size as your old Sub. I believe it is only a tad thicker. It would not seem much bigger. I say go with the SD!!

10 July 2013, 07:31 AM	#4
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	Sounds like you have an itch that needs scratching. Get the SD.

10 July 2013, 07:35 AM	#5
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,221	Sd

10 July 2013, 07:35 AM	#6
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Sd.

10 July 2013, 09:02 AM	#7
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	Sd

10 July 2013, 11:54 AM	#8
p_surabhi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: 40° 45' 21" Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 473	No contest, SD!

10 July 2013, 12:04 PM	#10
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	SD all the way

10 July 2013, 12:10 PM	#11
Betelc "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Singapore Posts: 314	SD; even though I don't have one, yet.

10 July 2013, 12:21 PM	#12
jbsmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Blake Location: US Watch: Daytonas Posts: 1,867	GMTIIc gets my vote.

10 July 2013, 12:40 PM	#14
Doug T "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Doug Location: Anola, Manitoba Watch: GMT Master 11 Posts: 431	My vote goes to GMT II.

10 July 2013, 12:49 PM	#15
Thebiglagu "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Tommy Location: New jersey Watch: Rolex 16610 Posts: 457	Seadweller!!!!!!!!!!

10 July 2013, 12:53 PM	#16
Chainring "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Grand Junction CO Watch: A few, not enough. Posts: 1,725	GMT II (cause that's what I have) but I want a SD, too. Tough choice.

10 July 2013, 12:55 PM	#17
Billywiz Banned Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: John Location: Florida Watch: YG President Posts: 2,090	Gmt 2

10 July 2013, 01:08 PM	#18
porschedude "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: USA Watch: 116610LV Posts: 1,207	SD for sure

10 July 2013, 01:23 PM	#20
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	The Sea-Dweller has a cult following online, especially here on TRF. I say just listen to your inner voice and make the decision but do try them on as well. As much as I adore the pedigree and the design of the SD16600 it was never as comfortable on my wrist as my 16610, or any of my other Rolex watches for that matter. Find a way to try them both on, then make up your mind.

10 July 2013, 02:31 PM	#22
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	Sounds like you love divers. Then go with the SD. It is plenty comfortable. That said it is really a tough call. The GMT II is just the perfect watch. I am fortunate to own them both as my only Rolexes. __________________

10 July 2013, 04:30 PM	#23
DJWong "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Hongkong Watch: SubC, SD, DSSD Posts: 582	SD, but I'm biased. GMT one day for sure :-)

11 July 2013, 03:47 AM	#24
h999r Banned Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: HR Location: Planet Earth Watch: -ing Barts. Posts: 4,244	Sd

11 July 2013, 04:12 AM	#25
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Get them both! The SD is bulky, in my opinion.

11 July 2013, 05:06 AM	#26
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Easy....SD.

11 July 2013, 05:07 AM	#27
elev8w "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Brooklyn/NYC Posts: 47	SD is not that bulky at all(as opposed to DSSD). I find it extremely close in profile to 16610s

11 July 2013, 05:56 AM	#28
stevedssd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 2,205	GMT for me.................................but I think the SD is calling you!

11 July 2013, 06:32 AM	#29
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Sd ftw __________________

11 July 2013, 06:46 AM	#30
laphroaig007 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Marc Location: France Watch: 116710 & PAM372 Posts: 1,027	GMT because it will sit better on your wrist. __________________ Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)