The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 April 2014, 08:17 PM   #1
bobznew
"TRF" Member
 
bobznew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: 116610ln
Posts: 84
Regretting getting the guidelock clasp...

Because now I'm ruined for anything that doesn't have it.

bobznew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 08:21 PM   #2
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
One reason that I will never get one
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 08:27 PM   #3
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
To the OP have to agree
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 08:32 PM   #4
Darlinboy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Darlinboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,701
The Glidelock is indeed a great clasp, love it on my SubC.

That said, the previous version has its charms too, and has more than proven its mettle over many decades.

Attached to the right Sub, I'm happy with either.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Darlinboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 10:06 PM   #5
Eric5964
"TRF" Member
 
Eric5964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Brtlg
Posts: 461
I agree 100%, wish all of my watches had it!

EricE
__________________
EricE

Watch addict
Michigan
Eric5964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 10:18 PM   #6
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
I them.....glidelocks are engineering genius!
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 11:05 PM   #7
Frogdog
"TRF" Member
 
Frogdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kentucky
Watch: u talknbout Willis
Posts: 688
Glidelock is definitely an amazing feature....no question. In terms of aesthetics I still prefer the previous clasp.
Frogdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 11:09 PM   #8
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
one of THE best of all recent upgrades!!
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 11:25 PM   #9
JJL
"TRF" Member
 
JJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
I hear so much about these new bracelets/clasps - I have to admit, having the old tuna can clasp I have a little bit of bracelet envy from those with newer watches.
JJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2014, 11:50 PM   #10
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
I LIKE my Easylink but am sure I would LOVE a Glidelock. Maybe someday Glidelock will be standard on the GMT and EXP too.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 12:04 AM   #11
lmcgbaj
"TRF" Member
 
lmcgbaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
All divers should have it. Its simply amazing.
lmcgbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 02:40 AM   #12
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
Glidelock should be standard on ALL watches, it's that good. My Omega is a butterfly clasp with NO adjustments and that does limit me from wearing it. This is more when it gets hot out and I'm constantly going between air conditioning and the heat. The sub is always ready. It is really nice to be able to open the clasp all the way to make sure that nothing is stretching when I put it on a watch pillow to wear something else.

GO Glidelock GO!!
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 02:48 AM   #13
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,992
Have to admit the glidelock is brilliant, stops you buying other models for sure !
__________________
RRGHOST1
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 02:51 AM   #14
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
One reason that I will never get one


Some things as Russell Peters would say are - "just too good!"
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 03:10 AM   #15
tfduff723
"TRF" Member
 
tfduff723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega 4 Me
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogdog View Post
Glidelock is definitely an amazing feature....no question. In terms of aesthetics I still prefer the previous clasp.
Well stated.
tfduff723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 03:13 AM   #16
sierra11b
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
May need to get one for the exp42 but I'm sure it's a small fortune.
sierra11b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 03:22 AM   #17
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJL View Post
I hear so much about these new bracelets/clasps - I have to admit, having the old tuna can clasp I have a little bit of bracelet envy from those with newer watches.
Don't lose any sleep over it. I own both types and I don't see the newer clasp as necessarily an "upgrade". Different, but not better IMHO. I'm not jonesing to put a glidelock on all my watches. I honestly see the new clasp as having more moving parts / springs than the old one = more difficult / costly to maintain and less durable.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 03:50 AM   #18
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogdog View Post
Glidelock is definitely an amazing feature....no question. In terms of aesthetics I still prefer the previous clasp.
I agree 100%.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 04:28 AM   #19
APguy1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Sub C 116610
Posts: 256
Couldn't agree more !!!!
APguy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 04:39 AM   #20
MisterStefan
"TRF" Member
 
MisterStefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: -
Posts: 290
Yes, it's wonderful!
MisterStefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 05:52 AM   #21
Perrinyanna
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Philippines
Posts: 262
The only drawback of the glidelock clasp is that my wife can easily borrow it bec she an fit it to her smaller wrist with just an easy glide!
Perrinyanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 05:59 AM   #22
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,018
The weight is not for me.....gimme those tinfoil clasps!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 06:09 AM   #23
postalworker
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Watch: 116618LN
Posts: 566
LOVE the Glidelock
postalworker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 07:54 AM   #24
MaxCargo
"TRF" Member
 
MaxCargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: EU
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
Don't lose any sleep over it. I own both types and I don't see the newer clasp as necessarily an "upgrade". Different, but not better IMHO. I'm not jonesing to put a glidelock on all my watches. I honestly see the new clasp as having more moving parts / springs than the old one = more difficult / costly to maintain and less durable.
YES!
__________________
Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent"
You just have to trust your own madness,sanity is only a cosy lie.
DSSD, Tudor Pelagos. SDc 4000
MaxCargo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 07:56 AM   #25
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
Agree !!
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 08:00 AM   #26
kultschar
"TRF" Member
 
kultschar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
DSSD Glidelock - now thats AWESOME!!!
kultschar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 08:12 AM   #27
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobznew View Post
Because now I'm ruined for anything that doesn't have it.

Exactly!
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 08:17 AM   #28
AndyK
"TRF" Member
 
AndyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Chicago
Watch: 216570
Posts: 878
Add me to the list of glidelock fans!
AndyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 08:26 AM   #29
threemonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
threemonkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
Funny thread. Yep, the new bracelet is wonderful. I also like all the noisy, tinkling sound my older Air King makes with the hollow links - even though it's harder to adjust the size.
threemonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2014, 09:38 AM   #30
anothernewphone
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
I've said repeatedly on here that the Glidelock has ruined every other watch that isn't a Submariner. I think if I ever ditch the LV, it'd be for a blue TT. I think I need to cross the threshold into my 30s before I do that.
anothernewphone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.