|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 April 2015, 11:25 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
|
Explorer II to Explorer Flip or Not ?
I have a 2003 Black Face Explorer 2 in pristine condition which I am thinking of flipping for a 2011 39mm Explorer - probably do a straight swap.
Good move - yes or no ? |
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:30 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
|
Only you can decide if it's a good move or not. Unless you need the cash from the Exp II to fund the Exp I, I would keep both for a bit and then determine which one you like best.
If I were in your position and had to pick one or the other, I would probably lean towards the Exp II. 
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 690
|
I think the 39 Explorer looks great, if the date and gmt functions from the explorer ii won't be missed... why not.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:31 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
I'd stick wth the ExpII as I find it to be a more interesting watch. I suspect you may regret the trade especially if you're flipping out of boredom.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:34 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
|
Well...all depends on what you want. It's a good move if you like the EXP and have lost the love for the EXP2. It's not a good move if you're just flipping to be flipping...
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:37 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I think it's a fair swap, but it's your choice.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 12:10 PM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
|
Quote:
What's your reason for wanting to flip?
__________________
Rolex Submariner Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue Tudor Ranger 79910 Nomos Club Datum 733 Nomos Metro 38 Stowa Flieger Classic 40 * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 12:28 PM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Exp, GMTII, Sub
Posts: 1,184
|
I think it is a fair trade. I love my 39mm explorer, it's the perfect watch for any occasion. It's light, and the comfort of the new style bracelet and clasp can't be beat. If you won't miss the date, GMT, and jump hour hand too much, go for it!
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 01:59 PM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 681
|
Fair
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 02:04 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: emad
Location: Kuwait
Watch: LV-PAM312-214270
Posts: 252
|
I will do it, if its me.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 02:08 PM
|
#11 | |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,050
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 02:10 PM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London - UK
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,249
|
I don't see why not unless the watch has sentimental value to you.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 07:36 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Personally I would keep the Exp II as I find it a more attractive watch, plus it has the date and GMT complications. Imho the only thing in favour of the Exp would be the (arguably) better clasp.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 07:45 PM
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 149
|
Exp II is the better watch
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 08:55 PM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Location
Watch: 16570
Posts: 56
|
Keep explo ii.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 08:57 PM
|
#16 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,793
|
I would rather go for a 36mm Explorer or Tudor Ranger, and have some money left over.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 08:59 PM
|
#17 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 09:13 PM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
|
I'd go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 09:17 PM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Kris
Location: Holland
Watch: me go
Posts: 730
|
I like the EXP2 More but thats maybe just me
__________________
Instagram watchpage: k99app, feel free to follow me ;) 17014 - oysterquartz Corniche Mistral40 Regards. |
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 09:21 PM
|
#20 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,134
|
If the second time zone and date aren't needed and you're tired of the II then why not. If you change your mind down the road it wouldn't be a tough journey to replace it.
__________________
 Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T  Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron  P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 09:42 PM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
I'd keep the exp 2
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 10:53 PM
|
#22 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
They are the rolex that more I like, both 16570 and 214270 are my favorite
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 10:56 PM
|
#23 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,419
|
Seems fair to me. Go for it!
|
|
|
|
|
3 April 2015, 11:14 PM
|
#24 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,073
|
Quote:
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ |
|
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 12:01 AM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tokyo
Watch: cha talking about?
Posts: 2,919
|
Yes!
|
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 12:03 AM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 241
|
Yes👍
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 12:18 AM
|
#27 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,428
|
It's fair but I wouldn't do it. I think the exp 2 is a far more interesting watch and will greatly appreciate in the next several years. I think you'll find the opposite with the modern explorer
|
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 12:38 AM
|
#28 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,550
|
Prefer the expII
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 01:56 AM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
|
Thanks for the feedback - Im just sitting here looking at the Explorer II face - Its too beautiful to let go of so I’m keeping it.
I will buy an Explorer 39 or a No date Sub (Older style) when I am more flush. |
|
|
|
|
4 April 2015, 04:28 AM
|
#30 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
