The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 July 2008, 10:47 AM   #1
Tempo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 99
Daytona Cal. 4130 vs. 3135 (hand alignment)

Apart from the Parachron Bleu Hairspring and Chronograph mechanism, is the Cal. 4130 superior in design to other Rolex movements like the 3135?

The 4130 and 3135 all seem to have the same advanced features: balanced bridge, breguet overcoil, free-sprung balance etc.

What dismays me about my SD is that, after much effort to set it properly, the minute hand still tends to "wander," sometimes overshooting or lagging behind the markers when the second hand hits zero. Some have attributed this to "slack in the gears" or the "lack of refinement in the 3135 movement." Others say such misalignment is part and parcel of mechanical watches.

This has made me wary of acquiring another Rolex or mechanical watch.

Is the 4130 is superior to the 3135 in terms of precise hand alignment? Some Daytona owners claim that their minute/second hands are perfectly synchronised. Wondering if this is generally true, as I'm thinking to acquire one soon.

Thanks.
Tempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 01:06 PM   #2
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
I think it depends on how you align it.
For all my Rollies, I align the minute hand counterclockwise.
I find this to be much better in terms of alignment.
In the past I used to adjust it by turning the minute hand beyond where I wanted to be and then turn backward.
Same thing happens with my Concord, Tag, and Seiko and other brands. They were all quartz watches.
Remember, quartz watches have mechanical parts as well. battery powers the second hand and the rest still relies on tiny wheels and gears to move.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 05:06 PM   #3
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,658
I would not say superior. They are very different movements. I am not a movement pro, so maybe others will chime in. The 3135 has a little play, which is normal.

I have both :)
__________________
Adam
walds11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 05:12 PM   #4
marshallr47
"TRF" Member
 
marshallr47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
I think there is a way to align the second hand(stop watch hand) if it doesn't perfectly align at the 12 o'clock position after resetting. Bo explained once in a post if I recall.
__________________
Ron
marshallr47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 06:25 PM   #5
Tempo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshallr47 View Post
I think there is a way to align the second hand(stop watch hand) if it doesn't perfectly align at the 12 o'clock position after resetting. Bo explained once in a post if I recall.
Thanks Marshall. If the stop watch second hand does not re-set to zero seconds, it should be easy to tell.

The more insidious problem is if the minute hand is not able to perfectly synchronise with the time-of-day second hand (smaller dial at 6 o'clock) ie the minute hand does not arrive at each marker precisely each time the smaller time-of-day second hand hits zero.

It would be great if the 4130 solved this problem.
Tempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 06:29 PM   #6
Tempo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
I would not say superior. They are very different movements. I am not a movement pro, so maybe others will chime in. The 3135 has a little play, which is normal.

I have both :)
Hello Walds11, Could I ask if you notice that your Daytona minute hand synchronises more precisely with the second hand better than in your SD or Sub? Or are both watches exhibit similar levels of "hand play"?

Thanks!
Tempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 08:29 PM   #7
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,658
My SS Sub Date has a little play and my SS Daytona has no play.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempo View Post
Hello Walds11, Could I ask if you notice that your Daytona minute hand synchronises more precisely with the second hand better than in your SD or Sub? Or are both watches exhibit similar levels of "hand play"?

Thanks!
__________________
Adam
walds11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2008, 11:15 PM   #8
Tempo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
My SS Sub Date has a little play and my SS Daytona has no play.

Thanks Wald11! Hope to hear the same from other Daytona owners.
Tempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 06:16 AM   #9
CPTL
"TRF" Member
 
CPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
This irritates me as well, as my Sub (3135), DJ (3135), and Expy (3186) all do this. I'll set the time with the second hand at 12 o'clock and the minute perfectly aligned with the proper tick mark. Within a couple complete sweeps of the second hand, the minute hand has wandered between the ticks.

I've tried setting the minute going forwards, backwards, and while dangling upside down hanging by only my left leg.

Perfection is unattainable. I'm dealing with it.
__________________

16610 Submariner Date; D Serial
16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial
16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial

And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial
CPTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 08:11 AM   #10
Felly Jr.
"TRF" Member
 
Felly Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Felly
Location: Washington State
Watch: SS Daytona/GV
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempo View Post
Thanks Wald11! Hope to hear the same from other Daytona owners.
All the Daytona's I've ever owned have been spot on with no play whatsoever in any of the hands.
Felly Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 10:03 AM   #11
Tempo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPTL View Post
Perfection is unattainable. I'm dealing with it.
Apparently, the way some have dealt with it is to buy a Daytona. So far in all the posts, I've yet to read of a Daytona with hands that don't synchronize.

I feel your pain. I've tried for a long time to get the hands on my SD to synchronize, but the minute hand will always stray a bit.

What's the point of a watch with a second hand that keeps perfect time, but the minute hand is often pointing to the wrong place?
Tempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.