Anyone regret going from 5 digit ref to 6 digit ref?

[sea-dweller]

I love both! Have some 5 and some 6!

[luvsub]

Depends, I owned 116710, and now wearing 16710. However, I like 718 and DSSD.

[red1108nyc]

I have gone through many and love the 5 digit reference case vs. 6 digit glide-lock and lume.

[Goodwill63]

Went through so many 6 digit rolex's till I settled on what fit me best and felt great on the wrist....sub 16610 and GMT. 16710. Classic like a great pair of jeans or a blue blazer. Some things just feel right....

[xjeeunitx]

The bracelet in itself wins me over to the six digit models easily.

[fskywalker]

I have both (16610 and 116710LN). Both are nicer, think 5 series case is nicer but ceramic bezel and bracelet from 6 series are superior

[Deroya]

Keep that sub don't "upgrade" that watch is and always will be a classic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[joe100]

The 5 digits are from the golden age of rolex. The advertising was better, the packaging looked cooler, the watches were sturdy, more affordable, and uncomplicated. However, if you're like me, spending $6k on a no-date, time only watch, I want the clasp and bracelet to be solid, with the most up to date movement. That's why I divested my GMT Master 16753 and got the 114300DRSO OP39.

[davegct]

Originally Posted by cwieb

Hello gang,



I was curious to see if anyone out there has gotten rid of their 5 digit reference to upgrade it to a 6 digit reference and ended up regretting it. The piece in contention is my 16610 that I do love very much, but the upgrades on the ceramic sub are very attractive... Mainly the bracelet. I'm worried that if I get rid of my 16610 I will regret it.



Look forward to hearing your stories and advice. Thanks!

I'm contemplating the same move but I'm not into the boxy look for the new subs so I'm thinking the 116600 sea dweller might be the right approach to switch from my 16610. Plan to try one on this weekend to see how it looks/feels etc.

[Randy63]

I know I would regret letting go of my 16610 Submariner. I'm not a fan of the super case subs. Having said that I am drawn to the 116610 Hulk. That green is so unique and dynamic that I may be able to look past its blocky case.

Even if I buy a Hulk down the road I wouldn't part with my 16610.

Randy

[kneedeep]

Sticking with my previous model Sub which fits like a love and looks just right on my size wrist.

[Colin10101]

I went from a 116200 Datejust to a 16710 GMT-Master II. Absolutely no regrets. I love the shape and style of the 5 digit watches. Something about them just feels more special. I think i've spent to much time reading old school Rolex advertisements.

[DCheeta]

I have both and like each for their own reasons. Will you regret changing? I don't think so.

[SSG215]

Originally Posted by AK797

I thought the new first rule of TRF Club was you do not mention 5 digit Rolexes...

LOL!!

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk

[cwieb]

I've decided to hold on to my 16610 for now. I am considering getting a 6 digit ref such as a 116520 white Daytona as a compliment in the future.

[second time]

Get the 6 digit and try it for a while, then cull the one that is second best.

[cwieb]

Thanks all for your responses!

[HogwldFLTR]

Had a 14060 T<25 and bought a 114060 as an upgrade. Ended up being uncomfortable so I still have a 14060 T<25 and the 114060 is long gone. Love the through lugs, lighter heft, and classic lines of the five digit sub. I do like my DJII and 36mm OP however. The DJII sits next to my 16013 in storage so I like both. The 36mm OP isn't significantly different than the 5 digit reference, FWIW. There are many six digit variants that I'd be more than happy with. Bottom line is to take or leave each watch on its own merits.

[gossbeau]

If it were me, I would flip it to get this

maxresdefault.jpg

[phillycheez]

I regret selling my 4 digits.. If the market wasn't so shady for vintage I would have stayed there. But I'm currently enjoying my 6 digit though. It's just another level in regards to feeling a quality time piece. I do miss the fact that when I scratched my 4 digits it didn't bother me... I'm starting to get over scratches on my 6 digit though... Slowly getting over it..

Honestly the 5 digit gen never really caught my eye..

[masyv6]

The 6 digits models are seriously great watches. 5 digits are good, but 6 digits are great

[emersm]

Too bad TRF wasn't around 30+ years ago. It would be interesting to hear the user comments as Rolex transitioned from the 4 digit references to the 5 digit references.

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by cwieb

Hello gang,

I was curious to see if anyone out there has gotten rid of their 5 digit reference to upgrade it to a 6 digit reference and ended up regretting it. The piece in contention is my 16610 that I do love very much, but the upgrades on the ceramic sub are very attractive... Mainly the bracelet. I'm worried that if I get rid of my 16610 I will regret it.

Look forward to hearing your stories and advice. Thanks!

Had a 16610 and now have a 116613. (also had a 4 digit Daytona and a 6 digit Daytona). I see the different number of digits as different watches rather than upgrades of the same one.

Comparing the Subs,

Like a lot:

1) The glidelock clasp (from an adjustability perspective) - its simple and effective

2) The maxi dial

Like not so much:

1) The "maxi" case. The older case is far more balanced with the smaller crown guards and lugs

Not fussed either way:

1) The solid centre link bracelet. Honestly, in normal wear you'd hardly know the difference. Yes its a technically an improvement but don;t expect it to feel much different day to day

2) The ceramic bezel - lovely from some angles, too shiny from others.

3) The lume. The "blue" is nicer than bright green imo, but it does the same job (and its no where near as blue as some pictures make out)

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by cwieb

I've decided to hold on to my 16610 for now. I am considering getting a 6 digit ref such as a 116520 white Daytona as a compliment in the future.

[Old Geezer]

I have a 5 digit sub and a 6 digit sub. I like them both, maybe a nod to the features of the 6 digit sub and bulkier appearance but I would never get rid of my 5 digit sub. I'm wearing it today.

[Volatile Agent]

Did you buy your 16610 new? If so I would not trade it because you will surely regret it.

If you bought it used there isn't harm in flipping to 6 digit. You can always flip back later on to a 5 if you miss it.

I personally do not like the cases on the 6 digit. The lugs look disproportionate to the bracelet, and it looks too much like a square block. That's just my opinion. I tried on a BLNR and really liked the asthetics of the dial but couldn't get over the bulky look of the case. I would have had the PCL brushed immediately if I willed have bought it as I do not care for that either.

The true TRF answer is to get both.

[Dr. Robert]

Not really, but I do miss lugholes

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by Dr. Robert

Not really, but I do miss lugholes

Agreed. That's why, despite everyone being more in love with the 3186 movement version these days, I recently opted for a 16570 with both lug holes and SEL, instead.

[kine999]

From 5 to 6, no regrets, ceramic bezel ⚡️


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

[xjeeunitx]

The only reference I miss has to be the 14060/14060M. It's perfect on any occasion and I always preferred to wear it on a black NATO. Epitome of a tool diver watch.