The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 December 2016, 07:35 AM   #1
TitanCi
"TRF" Member
 
TitanCi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
Am I crazy to think the Polar 216570 is...

...underwhelming? I'm probably the only one.

I wanted to pick up a new watch and take advantage of the sale David SW was having but i couldn't make up my mind between the white dial 216570 or a white or blue dial DJ II. I dont need a GMT function so that's why I went to look for a white dialed Rolex: DJII fit the bill. But after trying them on countless times, they all fell short a bit. I was so sure I wanted the 216570, but I kept finding it looks better in pics than on my wrist.

So I decided on none of them cuz they just didn't do it. The white dial DJ II looked awkward to me too and the blue dial is amazing but I don't know. Rolex sports watches are more appealing to me so I decided to save up for the 116613 LB!!!

Anyone else find the white dials to look great in pics but lackluster on the wrist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TitanCi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 07:40 AM   #2
DJExplorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: GA
Posts: 403
Im a massive white dial fan.
I have the Polar Explorer, SS Daytona White dial and waiting on the new Ceramic White dial Daytona.
They are striking in the sun, so easy to read and just brightens up everything.
DJExplorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 07:45 AM   #3
TitanCi
"TRF" Member
 
TitanCi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJExplorer View Post
Im a massive white dial fan.
I have the Polar Explorer, SS Daytona White dial and waiting on the new Ceramic White dial Daytona.
They are striking in the sun, so easy to read and just brightens up everything.


See that's the thing, when I see pics of them, wrist shots, etc... they're awesome! The white dial exp II was gonna be my last watch and last Rolex. But I just couldn't love the damn thing. But one look and try of the 116613 LB... it swayed my decision over to that.

Maybe I have to try it on again, I'm Asian so maybe it doesn't work well with my complexion although I'm not that light...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TitanCi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 07:52 AM   #4
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
It's the worst maxi update IMO. Underwhelming isn't how I would describe it.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:01 AM   #5
Rocco21
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
I agree completely,I tried on the 216570 polar 3 years ago and it officially became my least favorite Rolex.No disrespect to anyone but for me it does nothing.In pics definitely looks better.To me the dial is to big and looks empty.
Rocco21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:04 AM   #6
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
fair points.

20
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:06 AM   #7
Valkyrie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 121
I love my polar Exp2, what's wrong with you?
Valkyrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:11 AM   #8
GregBe
"TRF" Member
 
GregBe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitanCi View Post
See that's the thing, when I see pics of them, wrist shots, etc... they're awesome! The white dial exp II was gonna be my last watch and last Rolex. But I just couldn't love the damn thing. But one look and try of the 116613 LB... it swayed my decision over to that.

Maybe I have to try it on again, I'm Asian so maybe it doesn't work well with my complexion although I'm not that light...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I love the Polar Exp II (one of my favorite watches) but go with your gut...don't try to convince yourself to like a watch based on what others like. I have done that more times than I can count, and it never works out.
GregBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:24 AM   #9
alllexandru
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
alllexandru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Old continent
Posts: 2,446
This year I was in the same position, I was heading at the AD convinced I will leave with the 216570 on my wrist.
Strange thing happened, once I try it on my wrist all the shine and nice looks from the photos all over the internet kinda disappear, I wasn't convinced at all anymore
I didn't take it and I was leaving with mix feelings, I still love it in the photos but I'm pretty sure it is not for me.
Definitely I have to try the black one :))


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
alllexandru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:31 AM   #10
tommy91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
I prefer 16570 to me it's one of the best ever. I have been through many ceramic and pre ceramic and the 16570 is the one I will always keep in the collection. It's understated yes and that is part of why I love it. Explorer II doesn't draw any attention maybe that's why you think it is underwhelming, go with something you like.
tommy91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:44 AM   #11
TitanCi
"TRF" Member
 
TitanCi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy91 View Post
I prefer 16570 to me it's one of the best ever. I have been through many ceramic and pre ceramic and the 16570 is the one I will always keep in the collection. It's understated yes and that is part of why I love it. Explorer II doesn't draw any attention maybe that's why you think it is underwhelming, go with something you like.


Everyone has valid points. It's understated for sure, I know the one I chose to save for kinda screams "look at me!" And probably doesn't convince anyone that I'm NOT looking for the attention. In fact I wanted the 216570 for that reason too, but it just doesn't look right on me. I don't want to draw any attention to myself, but I guess the LB I chose doesn't accomplish that in any way or form!!!

I want to want it but as stated above... I shouldn't convince myself to like it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TitanCi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:45 AM   #12
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
Love it. Just hate the size of the case. Make it in 40mm and I'd have one on my wrist in no time.

I don't like the older 16570
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:47 AM   #13
larsr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 197
I agree, but I am bias as I think polar 16570 is one of the prettiest watches Rolex ever made...
larsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:54 AM   #14
rolexnub
"TRF" Member
 
rolexnub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdmorenot View Post
love it. Just hate the size of the case. Make it in 40mm and i'd have one on my wrist in no time.
+1
rolexnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:56 AM   #15
dberman3
"TRF" Member
 
dberman3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Doug
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 420
I bought a white dial 216570 about a year ago and went back-and-forth with it wondering if I should have purchased the 16570 instead. Over the course of the past 12 months I've added a few watches to the rotation and to my surprise, find that I wear the 216570 more than any other, hands down. This has grown to become my favorite watch. Didn't expect it, but that's what happened. I think it's understated and is just the perfect sports watch. To each his or her own, and I'm glad there's a wide variety of watches out there...but in my opinion, the 216570, white dial, is a fantastic watch.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
dberman3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 08:57 AM   #16
evlkoala
"TRF" Member
 
evlkoala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Sub
Posts: 862
Polar 16570 YES!

not the 42mm size tho
evlkoala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 09:00 AM   #17
Pharaoh_83
"TRF" Member
 
Pharaoh_83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 280
I just picked my 216570 up today but in the black dial. I liked the white dial initially but that that the markers and dial blended in too much. Went for the black instead.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20161201_134059.jpg (76.8 KB, 589 views)
Pharaoh_83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 09:19 AM   #18
HankL818
"TRF" Member
 
HankL818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NY
Watch: SubC / ExpII polar
Posts: 121
Love my polar. Gotten used the slightly larger case quickly.
HankL818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 09:36 AM   #19
slowturbo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Alan
Location: NoVA
Watch: 42mm Polar Exp II
Posts: 333
to me, the size and proportions of the 42mm case are perfect. I love the way it looks!
__________________
Rolex 326934 White
Omega Speedmaster GSOTM Meteorite
PAM 1314
IWC 3777-01
JLC Reverso Grand Taille
slowturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:01 AM   #20
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
In a white dial, I like the DJII white dial fluted bezel! I'm a chronic flipper and I miss that watch. I had the Exp II 42mm.......don't miss it.
Watchgeek5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:17 AM   #21
melrob1
"TRF" Member
 
melrob1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 968
I can see what you mean. It is pretty polarizing for people who love it and hate it. I think it may be the bezel that throws things off. I love how flat it sits and the look of the case and the bracelet together is really nice. The refrigerator dial throws me off a hit until that lume hit in a right light. Pretty dang cool!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_5987.JPG (168.1 KB, 526 views)
melrob1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:21 AM   #22
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
I like the white dial, I just don't like the larger 42mm case, it's way blocky IMHO
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:32 AM   #23
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Everything about the dial and hands are too much. It's like they went maxi times two to account for the extra dial area. I do like the orange hand (color not shape).
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:39 AM   #24
sickened1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
Am I crazy to think the Polar 216570 is...

Same like me, every time I see pics of Rolex with PCL it looks great but when I tried it on I found out it wasn't for me.
sickened1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 10:57 AM   #25
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,802
The glossy hands are something that don't always show in pics but really jump out in real life. That was what put me off when I tried one.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 11:01 AM   #26
BrazenC5
2024 Pledge Member
 
BrazenC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Everything about the dial and hands are too much. It's like they went maxi times two to account for the extra dial area. I do like the orange hand (color not shape).
This. On my wrist the proportions look off (wrist on smaller side). But amazing in pictures, especially when the chromalight is glowing.

Sent from my Galaxy S6 using Tapatalk
BrazenC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 11:01 AM   #27
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,011
No...not crazy...or the only one, for that matter.

I used to be all about the white dials. Over the years, I've had a polar, the same DJ2 you've been looking at, a YM2, and a white Daytona. Nowadays, I find myself more into the black version of the EXP2 and the only the white dial hanging around is the Daytona.

I guess I do like the white dial, just only in smaller doses than I originally thought.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 11:09 AM   #28
No SUBctitute
"TRF" Member
 
No SUBctitute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitanCi View Post
...underwhelming? I'm probably the only one.

I wanted to pick up a new watch and take advantage of the sale David SW was having but i couldn't make up my mind between the white dial 216570 or a white or blue dial DJ II. I dont need a GMT function so that's why I went to look for a white dialed Rolex: DJII fit the bill. But after trying them on countless times, they all fell short a bit. I was so sure I wanted the 216570, but I kept finding it looks better in pics than on my wrist.

So I decided on none of them cuz they just didn't do it. The white dial DJ II looked awkward to me too and the blue dial is amazing but I don't know. Rolex sports watches are more appealing to me so I decided to save up for the 116613 LB!!!

Anyone else find the white dials to look great in pics but lackluster on the wrist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Polar looks a little animated and cartoonish to me. The black one is a bit more refined looking.
No SUBctitute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 11:11 AM   #29
blackbard
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: US
Posts: 80
Nope

Bought my first one, then traded to a grail...Mistakenly and repurchased. I forgot how special the white dial is!

Wont go anywhere anytime soon. Nice to be a redheaded stepchild compared to all the subs and Datejusts....
blackbard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2016, 11:14 AM   #30
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by No SUBctitute View Post
The Polar looks a little animated and cartoonish to me. The black one is a bit more refined looking.
Cartoonish is the perfect description of both versions. The dial/hands are larger than life in a way that's really unappealing to me.

At least there's the five digit version - more choices for everyone.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.