Rolex Bracelets: No Longer 904L?

[JeremyS]

I just happened to be flipping through Rolex’s website, and I noticed Rolex now asserts only the watch cases are made out of 904L stainless steel, with the exception of the SeaDweller. When one scrolls down to the bracelet section of any watch profile, it doesn’t say OysterSteel or 904L. Did I just miss this announcement or something?

As a sidenote, I don’t especially think it’s a big deal. However, I seem to remember several years ago, Rolex claimed all stainless steel models’ cases and the bracelets were made out of 904L. Practically speaking, when I saw an ExplorerII at my local A.D. last week, I didn’t notice any difference visually between the bracelet and the watch

[JacksonStone]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I just happened to be flipping through Rolex’s website, and I noticed Rolex now asserts only the watch cases are made out of 904L stainless steel, with the exception of the SeaDweller. When one scrolls down to the bracelet section of any watch profile, it doesn’t say OysterSteel or 904L. Did I just miss this announcement or something?

I just looked at the 114060. Under bracelet material, it says Oystersteel.

https://www.rolex.com/watches/submar...4060-0002.html

Edit: just checked other models. Every single SS Rolex I checked, the bracelet material is listed as Oystersteel. Have you been enjoying a bit too much of the maca root down by the border?

[stylinleems]

Oystersteel is another name for 904L - Rolex likes to personalize things (same steel just different name).

Rolex just changed the way they describe the steel at Basel 2018. Now instead of saying 904L steel, everyone says Oystersteel.

Was discussed below:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=593302

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I just happened to be flipping through Rolex’s website, and I noticed Rolex now asserts only the watch cases are made out of 904L stainless steel, with the exception of the SeaDweller. When one scrolls down to the bracelet section of any watch profile, it doesn’t say OysterSteel or 904L. Did I just miss this announcement or something?

As a sidenote, I don’t especially think it’s a big deal. However, I seem to remember several years ago, Rolex claimed all stainless steel models’ cases and the bracelets were made out of 904L. Practically speaking, when I saw an ExplorerII at my local A.D. last week, I didn’t notice any difference visually between the bracelet and the watch

on the website now... SD 43 says Bracelet Material : Oystersteel

[JacksonStone]

Originally Posted by stylinleems

904L steel is Oystersteel (same steel just different name).

Rolex just changed the name this year at Basel 2018. Now instead of saying 904L steel, everyone says Oystersteel.

Was discussed below:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=593302

He's saying it doesn't say Oystersteel, either. But that's not correct.

[JeremyS]

Originally Posted by stylinleems

904L steel is Oystersteel (same steel just different name).

Rolex just changed the name this year at Basel 2018. Now instead of saying 904L steel, everyone says Oystersteel.

Was discussed below:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=593302

I understand the change in nomiclature, but that really wasn’t my question. The bracelet section of each of the watch profile, with the exception of the sea dweller, doesn’t even say “oystersteel.” Perhaps it was Just an oversight, but it seems strange to me. They specifically reference the case material being made of “OysterSteel,” but not the bracelet.

[JacksonStone]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I understand the change in nomiclature, but that really wasn’t my question. The bracelet section of each of the watch profile, with the exception of the sea dweller, doesn’t even say “oystersteel.” Perhaps it was Just an oversight, but it seems strange to me. They specifically reference the case material being made of “OysterSteel,” but not the bracelet.

Where are you looking? I'm on the US Rolex website, and under every SS model I check, it says Oystersteel in the specs section, under "Bracelet Material."

[JeremyS]

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

I just looked at the 114060. Under bracelet material, it says Oystersteel.

https://www.rolex.com/watches/submar...4060-0002.html

Edit: just checked other models. Every single SS Rolex I checked, the bracelet material is listed as Oystersteel. Have you been enjoying a bit too much of the maca root down by the border?

I read it; did you? ;-). It only says: “Rolex uses Oystersteel for its steel watch cases.” It doesn’t make the same claim when it talks about the bracelet. The only exception, as I said before, is the sea dweller.

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

Where are you looking? I'm on the US Rolex website, and under every SS model I check, it says Oystersteel in the specs section, under "Bracelet Material."

i posted a visual aid... im confused here

[stylinleems]

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

He's saying it doesn't say Oystersteel, either. But that's not correct.

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I understand the change in nomiclature, but that really wasn’t my question. The bracelet section of each of the watch profile, with the exception of the sea dweller, doesn’t even say “oystersteel.” Perhaps it was Just an oversight, but it seems strange to me. They specifically reference the case material being made of “OysterSteel,” but not the bracelet.

Apologies, misread ...

[JeremyS]

I gotcha—now I see. You’re correct. I’m on my iPhone so the “specifications” section doesn’t automatically expand on the mobile version of the website. My apologies. The magical unicorn metal includes the bracelet

[R!$]

its 904L if not better

[JacksonStone]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I read it; did you? ;-).

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I gotcha—now I see. You’re correct.

Great thread. Please post again soon.

[Token74]

Ha ha - oops - very nearly a good spot though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I just happened to be flipping through Rolex’s website, and I noticed Rolex now asserts only the watch cases are made out of 904L stainless steel, with the exception of the SeaDweller. When one scrolls down to the bracelet section of any watch profile, it doesn’t say OysterSteel or 904L. Did I just miss this announcement or something?

As a sidenote, I don’t especially think it’s a big deal. However, I seem to remember several years ago, Rolex claimed all stainless steel models’ cases and the bracelets were made out of 904L. Practically speaking, when I saw an ExplorerII at my local A.D. last week, I didn’t notice any difference visually between the bracelet and the watch

You must have missed the announcement.

They are now made out of unobtainium

[padi56]

904L = now called Oystersteel more marketing from Rolex to make it sound better.But in the real world in today's mainly pampered watches no real advantage over the industry norm 316L.Expect Rolex changed the name because once Rolex was the only one using it, but now a few other brands like Xoskeleton do now.The main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr) 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.And 904L is no harder than 316L, fact 904L will show scratches more easily than 316L, so if you are not in a high salt/acid environment 24/7 no real advantage.The secret of long life with any modern SS watch is regular washing in soap and water,plus normal routine service.Then no matter the fancy name of the SS, they will all last a lifetime and beyond.

[Rashid.bk]

Lmao....

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I read it; did you? ;-). It only says: “Rolex uses Oystersteel for its steel watch cases.” It doesn’t make the same claim when it talks about the bracelet. The only exception, as I said before, is the sea dweller.

Originally Posted by tyler1980

i posted a visual aid... im confused here

Originally Posted by JeremyS

I gotcha—now I see. You’re correct. I’m on my iPhone so the “specifications” section doesn’t automatically expand on the mobile version of the website. My apologies. The magical unicorn metal includes the bracelet

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

Great thread. Please post again soon.

Thank you gentlemen - cheered up my morning

[ashokleyland]

can't comment on this,

my only comment is: "nice profile pic" #noHomo ..

[martinscott]

Originally Posted by ashokleyland

can't comment on this,

my only comment is: "nice profile pic" #noHomo ..

^^^ You're comment is tasteless and uncalled for.

[brandrea]

That was a great way to start my day

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by martinscott

^^^ You're comment is tasteless and uncalled for.

I dont think it means what you think it means... it means nice pic... no sexual connotation intended.

I did a double take at first too

[ashokleyland]

Originally Posted by martinscott

^^^ You're comment is tasteless and uncalled for.

Triggered dude?? Your misinterpret my post...

For sure you don’t know the internet meme.. “no homo” 🤭

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JeremyS]

Originally Posted by ashokleyland

Triggered dude?? Your misinterpret my post...

For sure you don’t know the internet meme.. “no homo” 🤭

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s getting far afield from horology—or whatever we’re calling this discussion. But, I appreciate the compliment as to my pic. The dog is the cute one, anyway ;-). I’m also guessing the author didn’t know I’m actually gay. Don’t worry—we don’t take every compliment as a come-on. ;-)

[MoosicPa]

Originally Posted by ashokleyland

can't comment on this,

my only comment is: "nice profile pic" #noHomo ..

Originally Posted by martinscott

^^^ You're comment is tasteless and uncalled for.

+1. No need for the comment, not watch related, and offensive.

[Welshwatchman]

Originally Posted by ashokleyland

can't comment on this,

my only comment is: "nice profile pic" #noHomo ..

Should have kept your big mouth shut.

[martinscott]

Originally Posted by ashokleyland

Triggered dude?? Your misinterpret my post...

For sure you don’t know the internet meme.. “no homo” 🤭

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My sincere apologies and now realize what you were trying to say. At first thought it was offensive to the OP and was taken back... but now get what you meant.

[77T]

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

Should have kept your big mouth shut.

Certainly agree.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[JacksonStone]

Time to unsubscribe, I guess. The thread didn't need to exist in the first place, and now it's getting a second life for an even worse reason.

[WS9D]

Originally Posted by padi56

904L = now called Oystersteel more marketing from Rolex to make it sound better.But in the real world in today's mainly pampered watches no real advantage over the industry norm 316L.Expect Rolex changed the name because once Rolex was the only one using it, but now a few other brands like Xoskeleton do now.The main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr) 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.And 904L is no harder than 316L, fact 904L will show scratches more easily than 316L, so if you are not in a high salt/acid environment 24/7 no real advantage.The secret of long life with any modern SS watch is regular washing in soap and water,plus normal routine service.Then no matter the fancy name of the SS, they will all last a lifetime and beyond.

This...Thank you Padi for breaking it down..

For me, I notice no difference between 316 and 904