The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 March 2019, 06:44 AM   #1
smym18
"TRF" Member
 
smym18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,376
Watches Updated with 3235 Movement - Why isn't this a bigger deal?

It seems that a lot of members don't care that a bunch of watches were updated with the 3235 movement, which gives the watch basically another full day of power and another 5 or so years until service time.

People who take their watch off for the weekend can pick it right back up on a Monday with one less thing to worry about to start the week. It will also benefit people with a multi-watch rotation.

I'm just curious - why is this update being viewed as no big deal?

(Yes, I am aware setting a watch doesn't take much effort.)
smym18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 06:46 AM   #2
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,635
I'm a huge fan of the 3235. As someone with a couple of watches in rotation it's perfect. Love the BLRO more than my (now discontinued) BLNR and the 70 hour power reserve is a huge factor. Another reason why I love the Daytona too.

The entire YM lineup getting the new movement should be a bigger deal - no one seemed to care yesterday. I guess the YM just isn't that popular!
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 06:48 AM   #3
lawrence1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: N. California
Posts: 356
Not that big of a deal and the old movement is proven to be a workhorse. The longer power reserve is nice but not a must for most.
lawrence1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 06:50 AM   #4
MOOI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: roffa
Posts: 41
It's huge. 70h is the new 40.
MOOI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:23 AM   #5
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
i could care less about 70 hours PR. It's not a big deal to wind it up and set the time if it stops running cause it's off my wrist. That's half the fun for me. The 31XX is a proven work horse.
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:27 AM   #6
pkincy
"TRF" Member
 
pkincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 525
But we give up something also. With the DJ 36 we give up the hidden crown clasp on the jubilee and the white stick dial all for a slightly newer movement. On balance not a real win.
pkincy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:32 AM   #7
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by smym18 View Post
. . .
I'm just curious - why is this update being viewed as no big deal?

(Yes, I am aware setting a watch doesn't take much effort.)
It is puzzling....

When the 3186 came out you would think that Rolex had re-invented the wheel all over again and everybody was scrambling to have theirs, even if they were breaking right and left.

Now that they have a completely new movement series everybody is raging because they didn't get a new dial color or whatever.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:33 AM   #8
enjoythemusic
2025 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,605
70 hours is nice, do have to admit the current movements are seriously impressive. They've proven their work-horsemen like manner, plus Rolex can easily take care of things in a fast and timely manner. I don't recall much of anyone really complaining about any of the latest movements.
__________________
__________________

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:36 AM   #9
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by smym18 View Post
which gives the watch basically another...5 or so years until service time.
Is it only the 32xx that has a ten-year interval? Rolex updated the recommended service interval to ten years when the 31xx was still the more common movement.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:37 AM   #10
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
There is no change in service intervals with the new movement.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:41 AM   #11
Joed631
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 75
I completely agree, the extra power reserve is essential if you’re rotating multiple watches without a winder.
Joed631 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 07:59 AM   #12
jb335
2025 Pledge Member
 
jb335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,632
I would never be mad at a longer power reserve, but I also rather enjoy the process of winding and setting the time. It has a calming effect on me.

One of the reasons I would never own a winder.
jb335 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:03 AM   #13
gccmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 444
Longer power reserve does nothing for me. It’s easy to reset the time and date on a Rolex if it stops. Now if we were talking about something like a PP grand complication it would be a completely different story.
gccmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:13 AM   #14
danny1305
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: US
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrence1 View Post
Not that big of a deal and the old movement is proven to be a workhorse. The longer power reserve is nice but not a must for most.
This. While nice...it certainly isnt warranted of an upgrade for people that have the previous version of the watch. Many also use winders and will not see the benefit of the extended reserve
danny1305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:17 AM   #15
eteokles
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: California
Posts: 162
I remember a recent poll that showed most members had only one Rolex. If you only have one watch, and you wear it on the weekends as well as during the week, the power reserve becomes much less of a factor.
eteokles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:17 AM   #16
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrence1 View Post
Not that big of a deal and the old movement is proven to be a workhorse. The longer power reserve is nice but not a must for most.
This about sums it up perfectly. I really couldn't care less about power reserve as long as it's running when I wake up and put on my watch in the morning.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:19 AM   #17
RTG
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by smym18 View Post
It seems that a lot of members don't care that a bunch of watches were updated with the 3235 movement, which gives the watch basically another full day of power and another 5 or so years until service time.

People who take their watch off for the weekend can pick it right back up on a Monday with one less thing to worry about to start the week. It will also benefit people with a multi-watch rotation.

I'm just curious - why is this update being viewed as no big deal?

(Yes, I am aware setting a watch doesn't take much effort.)
I have wondered the same thing. I think Rolex did a lot this year and cleaned up or finished out many lines including Yacht-Master, GMT, Day-Date, DJ41/36. In forums or social media everyone is pissed that there is no new Sub and god forbid gold on a luxury watch. Crazy to expect a new SS Sub, SS Daytona or SS GMT every single year.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
RTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:22 AM   #18
~JJ
"TRF" Member
 
~JJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,315
I think the extra power reserve is awesome. The self proclaimed WIS crowd of late only seems to care about value retention/gains and hottest SS pieces from two brands.
~JJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:23 AM   #19
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
I recall a thread from a professional watchmaker on the forum compare the two movements 3135 and 3235 and ultimately he preferred the 3135. I am not knowledgeable enough to have an opinion, but the 3135 is an absolute workhorse, proven and time tested. It has its place in history and I am perfectly happy with it. I would love 70 hour power but in the end of the day, if the next sub has enough aesthetic changes I enjoy, I’d love to get it, but if the watch has similar proportions, I am perfectly happy with the 3135.
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:24 AM   #20
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Is it only the 32xx that has a ten-year interval? Rolex updated the recommended service interval to ten years when the 31xx was still the more common movement.
No, it's not limited to the 32xx, but rather any watches coming with Green hang tags. I believe the switch was July/August 2015. At that point any watches still in cases, ADs were instructed to switch from the Red to the new Green hang tags and issue accompanied warrantees, service recommendations and guarantees.

I have two green tags in the collection, Feb 16 Sub and a Feb 16 Daytona. Both have the +2 -2 as well as the 5 year warranty as well.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:24 AM   #21
rootbeer7
2025 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
It is puzzling....

When the 3186 came out you would think that Rolex had re-invented the wheel all over again and everybody was scrambling to have theirs, even if they were breaking right and left.

Now that they have a completely new movement series everybody is raging because they didn't get a new dial color or whatever.
Sadly, people are only interested in what Rolex they can buy to flip, show off, beat the system with etc etc. Movements are just unimportant to most. Sad state of affairs to those that love the heritage, the brand and strive to own one.
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:25 AM   #22
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTG View Post
I have wondered the same thing. I think Rolex did a lot this year and cleaned up or finished out many lines including Yacht-Master, GMT, Day-Date, DJ41/36. In forums or social media everyone is pissed that there is no new Sub and god forbid gold on a luxury watch. We can't have a new Sub, Daytona or GMT every single year.
It's great Rolex completed the movement conversion in the GMT line, but I don't like how they went about it: they eliminated most of the watches that still had the 3186, while introducing a lot of redundancy to make up for it. The Y-M transition made more sense: just update the existing watches all at once, while introducing a new model to grab attention. How hard is that? (Granted, I still think the Y-M line has aesthetic multiple personality disorder, but that was true before the movement transition.)
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:25 AM   #23
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
The DayDate I bought over 30 years ago keeps near perfect time. The YachtMaster I bought 8 month ago keeps near perfect time. I would not choose a Rolex based on movement. Any Rolex will keep near perfect time.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:25 AM   #24
FoolioABC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 69
Hi, the new calibers definitely have improved specs, but whether they are strictly an improvement seems to be up for debate for watchmakers specifically. Check out this article that I had previously seen here, it addresses this: http://bhi.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/...-the-Month.pdf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FoolioABC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:26 AM   #25
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
The 3135 is bullet proof and extremely accurate. To me the move from 3135 to 3235 is not as significant as the 4030 to 4130. I too find it puzzling why so many want the early 3186s that are known to have some issues over the 3185s.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:27 AM   #26
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
No, it's not limited to the 32xx, but rather any watches coming with Green hang tags. I believe the switch was July/August 2015. At that point any watches still in cases, ADs were instructed to switch from the Red to the new Green hang tags and issue accompanied warrantees, service recommendations and guarantees.

I have two green tags in the collection, Feb 16 Sub and a Feb 16 Daytona. Both have the +2 -2 as well as the 5 year warranty as well.
Thanks. I knew the warranty and accuracy specs changed in 2015 with the green tags. I wasn't aware that also included a change in the recommended service interval. Even so, I was pretty sure the ten-year interval didn't apply only to the 32xx movements.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:29 AM   #27
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Thanks. I knew the warranty and accuracy specs changed in 2015 with the green tags. I wasn't aware that also included a change in the recommended service interval. Even so, I was pretty sure the ten-year interval didn't apply only to the 32xx movements.
You were correct. Big update too imo compared to competitors
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:30 AM   #28
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
The 3135 is bullet proof and extremely accurate. To me the move from 3135 to 3235 is not as significant as the 4030 to 4130. I too find it puzzling why so many want the early 3186s that are known to have some issues over the 3185s.
I think it's mostly because how few of them made it into the 16710 so it's seen as a collectible variation. I mean I'm kind of guilty too, I made sure I got a 16570 with the 3186.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:32 AM   #29
Dr Watches
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
It is puzzling....

When the 3186 came out you would think that Rolex had re-invented the wheel all over again and everybody was scrambling to have theirs, even if they were breaking right and left.

Now that they have a completely new movement series everybody is raging because they didn't get a new dial color or whatever.
The population of collectors is different now. And not in a way where things like movements are understood or valued.
Dr Watches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2019, 08:32 AM   #30
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
To add on to my post...

Watchmaker's Surprising Perspective on the new 3235 vs. the 3135
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?sha...0&share_type=t
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.