ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 March 2019, 06:44 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,376
|
Watches Updated with 3235 Movement - Why isn't this a bigger deal?
It seems that a lot of members don't care that a bunch of watches were updated with the 3235 movement, which gives the watch basically another full day of power and another 5 or so years until service time.
People who take their watch off for the weekend can pick it right back up on a Monday with one less thing to worry about to start the week. It will also benefit people with a multi-watch rotation. I'm just curious - why is this update being viewed as no big deal? (Yes, I am aware setting a watch doesn't take much effort.) |
22 March 2019, 06:46 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,635
|
I'm a huge fan of the 3235. As someone with a couple of watches in rotation it's perfect. Love the BLRO more than my (now discontinued) BLNR and the 70 hour power reserve is a huge factor. Another reason why I love the Daytona too.
The entire YM lineup getting the new movement should be a bigger deal - no one seemed to care yesterday. I guess the YM just isn't that popular! |
22 March 2019, 06:48 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: N. California
Posts: 356
|
Not that big of a deal and the old movement is proven to be a workhorse. The longer power reserve is nice but not a must for most.
|
22 March 2019, 06:50 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: roffa
Posts: 41
|
It's huge. 70h is the new 40.
|
22 March 2019, 07:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
|
i could care less about 70 hours PR. It's not a big deal to wind it up and set the time if it stops running cause it's off my wrist. That's half the fun for me. The 31XX is a proven work horse.
|
22 March 2019, 07:27 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 525
|
But we give up something also. With the DJ 36 we give up the hidden crown clasp on the jubilee and the white stick dial all for a slightly newer movement. On balance not a real win.
|
22 March 2019, 07:32 AM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,593
|
Quote:
When the 3186 came out you would think that Rolex had re-invented the wheel all over again and everybody was scrambling to have theirs, even if they were breaking right and left. Now that they have a completely new movement series everybody is raging because they didn't get a new dial color or whatever.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
22 March 2019, 07:33 AM | #8 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,605
|
70 hours is nice, do have to admit the current movements are seriously impressive. They've proven their work-horsemen like manner, plus Rolex can easily take care of things in a fast and timely manner. I don't recall much of anyone really complaining about any of the latest movements.
__________________
__________________ Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
22 March 2019, 07:36 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
|
22 March 2019, 07:37 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
There is no change in service intervals with the new movement.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2 |
22 March 2019, 07:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 75
|
I completely agree, the extra power reserve is essential if you’re rotating multiple watches without a winder.
|
22 March 2019, 07:59 AM | #12 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,632
|
I would never be mad at a longer power reserve, but I also rather enjoy the process of winding and setting the time. It has a calming effect on me.
One of the reasons I would never own a winder. |
22 March 2019, 08:03 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 444
|
Longer power reserve does nothing for me. It’s easy to reset the time and date on a Rolex if it stops. Now if we were talking about something like a PP grand complication it would be a completely different story.
|
22 March 2019, 08:13 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: US
Posts: 117
|
This. While nice...it certainly isnt warranted of an upgrade for people that have the previous version of the watch. Many also use winders and will not see the benefit of the extended reserve
|
22 March 2019, 08:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: California
Posts: 162
|
I remember a recent poll that showed most members had only one Rolex. If you only have one watch, and you wear it on the weekends as well as during the week, the power reserve becomes much less of a factor.
|
22 March 2019, 08:17 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
This about sums it up perfectly. I really couldn't care less about power reserve as long as it's running when I wake up and put on my watch in the morning.
|
22 March 2019, 08:19 AM | #17 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,645
|
Quote:
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
|
22 March 2019, 08:22 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,315
|
I think the extra power reserve is awesome. The self proclaimed WIS crowd of late only seems to care about value retention/gains and hottest SS pieces from two brands.
|
22 March 2019, 08:23 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
|
I recall a thread from a professional watchmaker on the forum compare the two movements 3135 and 3235 and ultimately he preferred the 3135. I am not knowledgeable enough to have an opinion, but the 3135 is an absolute workhorse, proven and time tested. It has its place in history and I am perfectly happy with it. I would love 70 hour power but in the end of the day, if the next sub has enough aesthetic changes I enjoy, I’d love to get it, but if the watch has similar proportions, I am perfectly happy with the 3135.
|
22 March 2019, 08:24 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
Quote:
I have two green tags in the collection, Feb 16 Sub and a Feb 16 Daytona. Both have the +2 -2 as well as the 5 year warranty as well. |
|
22 March 2019, 08:24 AM | #21 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,188
|
Quote:
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
|
22 March 2019, 08:25 AM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Quote:
|
|
22 March 2019, 08:25 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
The DayDate I bought over 30 years ago keeps near perfect time. The YachtMaster I bought 8 month ago keeps near perfect time. I would not choose a Rolex based on movement. Any Rolex will keep near perfect time.
|
22 March 2019, 08:25 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 69
|
Hi, the new calibers definitely have improved specs, but whether they are strictly an improvement seems to be up for debate for watchmakers specifically. Check out this article that I had previously seen here, it addresses this: http://bhi.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/...-the-Month.pdf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 March 2019, 08:26 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
The 3135 is bullet proof and extremely accurate. To me the move from 3135 to 3235 is not as significant as the 4030 to 4130. I too find it puzzling why so many want the early 3186s that are known to have some issues over the 3185s.
|
22 March 2019, 08:27 AM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Quote:
|
|
22 March 2019, 08:29 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
You were correct. Big update too imo compared to competitors
|
22 March 2019, 08:30 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
I think it's mostly because how few of them made it into the 16710 so it's seen as a collectible variation. I mean I'm kind of guilty too, I made sure I got a 16570 with the 3186.
|
22 March 2019, 08:32 AM | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 544
|
Quote:
|
|
22 March 2019, 08:32 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
|
To add on to my post...
Watchmaker's Surprising Perspective on the new 3235 vs. the 3135 https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?sha...0&share_type=t |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.