ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jmbarrack · 14 January 2020, 09:58 PM

I don’t think we’re ever going to see a ceramic bezel Explorer II. It’s clear to me that Rolex is using ceramic as a replacement for Aluminum where it was previously used on models. So far, everything that has ceramic with exception of the PM YMs - which I’d argue were newly created models - has had at one point used Aluminum on the bezels. Maybe this is just me, but that’s the correlation I see.

I think if we do get a new movement or redesigned lugs on the Sub it’s going PM first. Then steel later. I wouldn’t put it past Rolex to make a PM Submariner with these improvements everyone is clamoring for.

They’re not just going to give the people what they want before giving them something they don’t.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

14 January 2020, 09:58 PM	#11
Jmbarrack "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: United States Watch: Ever changing! Posts: 1,150	I don’t think we’re ever going to see a ceramic bezel Explorer II. It’s clear to me that Rolex is using ceramic as a replacement for Aluminum where it was previously used on models. So far, everything that has ceramic with exception of the PM YMs - which I’d argue were newly created models - has had at one point used Aluminum on the bezels. Maybe this is just me, but that’s the correlation I see. I think if we do get a new movement or redesigned lugs on the Sub it’s going PM first. Then steel later. I wouldn’t put it past Rolex to make a PM Submariner with these improvements everyone is clamoring for. They’re not just going to give the people what they want before giving them something they don’t. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)