The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23 February 2020, 02:28 AM   #1
upsidedownbelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 573
Short handed Explorer

I have owned this piece for a couple years and love it. What was the general consensus on the short hands? Is it generally accepted that they were a mistake and that’s why it had a short run and RSC will replace the hands with the bigger ones? Do you think that when they changed to the longer hands they also changed back to the lume numerals because they just didn’t want to correct the one mistake? They wanted it to see like a different watch. Either way, I like both but was just wondering what the actual story was. The short handed version seems like kind of an outlier in the past decade or so.
upsidedownbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.