![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,066 | 69.67% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.12% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
401 | 26.21% |
Voters: 1530. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
I own two Datejust 41 Rolex watches.
One is about three years old: no issues DJ41 "2" is about eighteen months old: no issues. Both watches worn in daily rotation: I wear them enough that neither have run down. DLST and calendar adjustments are the *only time the crown is unscrewed. Both references run appropriately: -3 / +4. I rarely check as this level of timekeeping is more than acceptable for a mechanical automatic watch. To add: My brother's six month old DJ41 is still running 'factory spec' -2 / +2 with no issues. It too has never run down except for calendar/DLST adjustments. Hope this helps. Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 22 (0 members and 22 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.