ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

amanbra · 14 April 2022, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyp

I meant simple to implement but as yet undiscovered (likely due to either lack of understanding of cause or unwillingness to admit a problem exists). For example, using the current design but different materials for the pinions. Or does fixing one design flaw simply expose another?

Wondering if Rolex will just let it ride until the mechanics of the 22xx are ready to be enlarged?

I personally doubt that. As mentioned in other posts Rolex are known to silently fix things. Things we folk didn’t even know was an issue.

They 100% know about this and if there was a simple fix it would already be implemented.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok?
Yes, no issues	1,089	69.27%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine	63	4.01%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d)	420	26.72%
Voters: 1572. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
sheldonsmith