|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28 February 2010, 08:26 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Why do you think Rolex would wanna ditch 'cobalt' blue and go with the smurf blue?
Just was wondering, why would Rolex want to ditch that 'cobalt' blue seen on the 16613 and go with the 'smurf' blue? Would you do that as a manufacturer? From an aesthetique point of view, the 'cobalt' blue looks way better than the 'smurf' blue seen on the WG Sub and TT Sub Ceramic. From a technical stand point. Why do you think Rolex wanna do that?
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks.  Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode