The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2 November 2005, 07:10 AM   #1
Atomic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This has always stuck in my craw...

All the Rolex watches have names, which I think is way cooler and better maketing than a simple number designation (although Panerai has it right by limiting to three digits, after that my dyslexia sets in).

But in terms of the awesome and mighty Explorer II, I've never understood why the genius' at Rolex gave it that name. I mean, it bears absolutely no resemblance to the original Explorer, the movement is completely different and it has always offered two more complications than the Explorer.

Since the watch was 'designed' for speleologists, why not give it a more robust name like CaveDweller, or CaveMaster or SpeleMaster...

If you ever look into Dowling's book, Rolex has legal claim to a plethora of watch names (prolly more than is listed there now), so why didn't they get more creative? Oops, I'm talking about Rolex... I forgot.

I just don't get the connect between this speleologist's watch and the original Explorer.
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

Takuya Watches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.