![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
14060m
Hey guys,
I was (quite embarrassingly) stuck for an answer when someone asked me why the No-Date Sub was not COSC certified. Anybody got an answer to this one? The closest I've been able to get to an answer is either: 1) it reduces cost and is distinguished from the Sub Date 2) it leads back to the 5513 and 6200/4/5 which have no chronometer inscription on the dial *EDIT: Whoops - 14060M, not 14040! ![]()
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.