ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rolex170 · 1 October 2012, 12:56 AM

Hoping to find some time today to try on some models at my AD. I appreciate the DNA and history of the Base models, but looking to get more utility from the more modern models. At this point, my budget limit is at the 312. I actually like the 312 in all respects right now...

Pros
sec + date function
Automatic
No cyclops (Looks cleaner to me)
Clear case back (it looks cool)

Cons (for me):
Thickness (.104 fit was great, but will need to try the 312)
Tang buckle (I like the deplyant on the 104 strap)

I would appreciate any comments on thickness compared to the 104!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

1 October 2012, 12:56 AM	#32
rolex170 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Oliver Location: East Coast USA Watch: 16200, 312 Posts: 99	Hoping to find some time today to try on some models at my AD. I appreciate the DNA and history of the Base models, but looking to get more utility from the more modern models. At this point, my budget limit is at the 312. I actually like the 312 in all respects right now... Pros sec + date function Automatic No cyclops (Looks cleaner to me) Clear case back (it looks cool) Cons (for me): Thickness (.104 fit was great, but will need to try the 312) Tang buckle (I like the deplyant on the 104 strap) I would appreciate any comments on thickness compared to the 104!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)