ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

002 · 1 October 2019, 05:05 PM

I keep seeing Tudor 792X0 chronographs described as Pre-Tiger, meaning they are from before the Tiger Woods endorsement. But, based on serial number, bracelet style and lack of tritium, they are actually POST-Tigers.

Is this an attempt mislead and boost the value of a sale item or do people not realize that this reference continued after Tiger?

I suppose "post Tiger" doesn't sound as cool.

Probably not too much discussion to be had on this topic. Putting it out there because it gets my goat and hopefully someone will search the forum and see this before buying a non-tritium Pre-Tiger as some kind of added value.

1 October 2019, 05:05 PM	#1
002 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2018 Location: TRUSTVILLE Posts: 94	Pre-Tiger Misnomer I keep seeing Tudor 792X0 chronographs described as Pre-Tiger, meaning they are from before the Tiger Woods endorsement. But, based on serial number, bracelet style and lack of tritium, they are actually POST-Tigers. Is this an attempt mislead and boost the value of a sale item or do people not realize that this reference continued after Tiger? I suppose "post Tiger" doesn't sound as cool. Probably not too much discussion to be had on this topic. Putting it out there because it gets my goat and hopefully someone will search the forum and see this before buying a non-tritium Pre-Tiger as some kind of added value.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)