|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 February 2009, 12:35 AM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mac
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,367
|
let's just agree it's a "different" movement. Improved, better, worse, etc is yet to be deterined as time will tell that.
The technical differences are highligthed in above posts, but keep in mind, why would Rolex stop putting 3185s in the current models and change the model number if it didn't accomplish one or more of the things below? 1. Lower Cost 2. Make the movement better 3. Free up dependence on outside suppliers - (which is a completely different discussion) You decide...
__________________
 I do not offer or provide any Rolex investment advice or opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability of any particular watch, collections of watches, transaction or investment watch collecting strategy, and you shall be fully responsible for any watch decisions you make, and such decisions will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial circumstances, watch objectives, risk tolerance, and what looks good in yoru opinion on your wrist. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode