ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Double Batons on the New OP36/41... | |||
LOVE - Rolex nailed the dial design | 47 | 20.61% | |
OK - It’s good but not perfect | 103 | 45.18% | |
HATE - Doesn’t do it for me at all | 57 | 25.00% | |
Don’t know / don’t care | 21 | 9.21% | |
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
9 September 2020, 06:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
|
DOUBLE TROUBLE? - Do you like the new twin index markers on the 2020 OP36 and OP41?
So, response to the new 2020 Oyster Perpetual changes has been pretty positive. Updated movement, new larger size, upgraded bracelet. It will sell very well. It will be successful. All that is a given.
Let’s focus specifically on the dial changes. Please feel free to review and discuss any of these particular questions and issues... OR share any comment you have about the dial design: 1. The double batons at 3, 6, 9. Were they needed? Do you like or dislike them? If they were done to fill up dial area, why are they are on both the OP36 AND OP41? 2. Do you think the batons have the “perfect proportions” on both the OP36 and OP41? Or only one of them? 3. Elimination of the “Explorer” dial option. Good move? Keeps the Explorer dial on the Explorer and the OP has its own unique look? 4. The coronet size on the dial. I can’t tell if they are the exact same coronet emblems used on both the OP36 and OP41. But, the proportion of coronet/baton/dial looks perfect on the OP36. On the OP41, the batons are bigger... making the coronet look smaller and weaker. Let’s please have a cordial discussion and refrain from silly or snarky comments. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.