ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

wiem0014 · 14 November 2020, 01:09 PM

Couple things to think about:
1. If you consider the SD4K to be top heavy, you may not like the thickness of the Skydweller either. I think it looks great on you, but it is on the larger side.
2. I think the Sub would be redundant, but the Skydweller would fill a really nice place in your collection (dressy watch, white dial, etc)
3. You'll find the Skydweller to be much harder to come by in the future.

I think the Skydweller is the pick regardless, but IMO it's easy once you factor in the SD4K in your collection

14 November 2020, 01:09 PM	#29
wiem0014 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2019 Location: Minneapolis, MN Watch: 126710BLRO Posts: 236	Couple things to think about: 1. If you consider the SD4K to be top heavy, you may not like the thickness of the Skydweller either. I think it looks great on you, but it is on the larger side. 2. I think the Sub would be redundant, but the Skydweller would fill a really nice place in your collection (dressy watch, white dial, etc) 3. You'll find the Skydweller to be much harder to come by in the future. I think the Skydweller is the pick regardless, but IMO it's easy once you factor in the SD4K in your collection __________________ Find me on Instagram: MN_Watch_Fanatic Patek: 5168G (Blue) Rolex: 126710BLRO, 116515LN, 124060

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)