![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,070 | 69.62% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.10% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
404 | 26.28% |
Voters: 1537. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The UK
Watch: I love them all.
Posts: 1,867
|
As many of you will know I have been taking readings on my Sub-Date 126610 with a TimeGrapher.
I have logged those results on a spreadsheet and saxo3 kindly converted them into a graph for me and all to see. Seeing the results displayed on a graph is so much more clear as to what is really happening. Since taking the readings on a TimeGrapher I have also taken readings on an App on my iPhone called WatchTracker. This is done by tapping on the screen when the second hand of your watch reaches a certain point. it is super simple to do. There are clear differences in the amount of data you can get but there are clear similarities also. It is a very interesting way of comparing different methods of timing a watch. On the TimeGrapher it showed the x to be +0.2spd when fully wound and x to be -0.4spd after 12 hours. On the WatchTracker it showed an average loss of -0.4spd. Of course my Sub-Date with a 3235 movement is self winding (aka automatic) but I am fairly static all day. I do go for daily walks with my dog but I dont swing my arms much. I therefore can accept that my Sub-date is not fully wound most f the time and the loss of -0.4spd is probably correct on BOTH the more precise TimeGrapher and the app on my phone. I thought that was very interesting. I attach below the spreadsheet and WatchTracker report sheets. I can thoroughly recommend BOTH methods as they have proved to be so similar. ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone 12 using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, CharlesN Member of the IWJG. Last edited by CharlesN; 14 May 2021 at 09:11 PM.. Reason: My usual typos ! |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 64 (0 members and 64 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.