![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,088 | 69.26% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.01% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
420 | 26.73% |
Voters: 1571. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,226
|
Quote:
I assumed you were across the full scope of work when Rolex repairs the 32xx movements. The worn parts are automatically replaced with new ones. There's no point leaving them in there as that's actually what the problem is. They have to be replaced to start afresh ![]() Parts are routinely replaced at a normal service as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.