![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,099 | 69.29% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 3.97% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
424 | 26.73% |
Voters: 1586. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,370
|
Quote:
In a way I kind of like it like that at my age ![]() However, some say I do have a mind like a steel trap and can recall pertinent points, but references are unavailble unless you can do the Vulcan mind meld thing. I can say that some of the info you are seeking is contained within this thread and other threads that are related to this matter on this forum. Also, like yourself I get around and we possibly have crossed paths previously on other forums without being aware of it. So we are likely to be drawing on common sources due to our shared interest. With regard to the second point you raise. We have had it here on this forum on two separate occassions from different sources quite a long time apart, also on another forum. My apologies for not being able to help further in a manner that would be more constructive. It's not necessarily alarming from my perspective, simply interesting. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 28 (0 members and 28 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.