![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,090 | 69.29% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.01% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
420 | 26.70% |
Voters: 1573. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43,443
|
Understand the kidding reference, but in simpler terms, Rolex regulates any movement the same whether 30xx, 31xx, or 32xx.
After all, COSC uses five different positions and METAS uses six - PLUS at least three different temperatures to certify. So after V&H, we still have 3-4 to go... ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.